Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction May Serve as a Useful Adjunct to Conventional Culture in The Detection of Cutibacterium acnes in the Glenohumeral Joint: A Study of 100 Consecutive Patients.

Matthew Como, Rajiv P Reddy, Margaret L Hankins, Gillian E Kane, Dongzhu Ma, Peter G Alexander, Kenneth L Urish, Amin Karimi, Albert Lin
{"title":"Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction May Serve as a Useful Adjunct to Conventional Culture in The Detection of Cutibacterium acnes in the Glenohumeral Joint: A Study of 100 Consecutive Patients.","authors":"Matthew Como, Rajiv P Reddy, Margaret L Hankins, Gillian E Kane, Dongzhu Ma, Peter G Alexander, Kenneth L Urish, Amin Karimi, Albert Lin","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2023.70190.3295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Synovial fluid or tissue culture is the current gold standard for diagnosis of infection, but Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) is a frequent cause of shoulder PJI and is a notoriously fastidious organism. The purpose of this study was to compare quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to standard culture as a more rapid, sensitive means of identifying C. acnes from the glenohumeral joint. We hypothesized that qRT-PCR would be more effective than standard culture at identifying C. acnes and would have greater sensitivity and specificity for detecting infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study with 100 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery with known positive and negative controls. Intraoperatively, synovial fluid and tissue was obtained for C. acnes qRT-PCR and results were blinded to the gold standard microbiology cultures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical review demonstrated 3 patients (3%) with positive cultures, none of which were positive for C. acnes. Of the samples tested by the C. acnes qRT-PCR standard curve, 12.2% of tissue samples and 4.5% of fluid samples were positive. Culture sensitivity was 60.0%, specificity was 100.0%, PPV was 100.0%, and NPV was 97.9%. C. acnes qRT-PCR standard curve sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV was 60.0%, 90.3%, 25.0%, and 97.7% respectively for tissue specimens and 0%, 95.2%, 0%, and 95.2% respectively, for fluid specimens. For combination of culture and tissue qRT-PCR, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was 100%, 90.3%, 35.7%, and 100%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report that qRT-PCR for C. acnes identified the organism more frequently than conventional culture. While these findings demonstrate the potential utility of qRT-PCR, the likelihood of false positive results of qRT-PCR should be considered. Thus, qRT-PCR may be useful as an adjuvant to current gold standard workup of synovial fluid or tissue culture for the diagnosis of infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2023.70190.3295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Synovial fluid or tissue culture is the current gold standard for diagnosis of infection, but Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) is a frequent cause of shoulder PJI and is a notoriously fastidious organism. The purpose of this study was to compare quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to standard culture as a more rapid, sensitive means of identifying C. acnes from the glenohumeral joint. We hypothesized that qRT-PCR would be more effective than standard culture at identifying C. acnes and would have greater sensitivity and specificity for detecting infection.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study with 100 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery with known positive and negative controls. Intraoperatively, synovial fluid and tissue was obtained for C. acnes qRT-PCR and results were blinded to the gold standard microbiology cultures.

Results: Clinical review demonstrated 3 patients (3%) with positive cultures, none of which were positive for C. acnes. Of the samples tested by the C. acnes qRT-PCR standard curve, 12.2% of tissue samples and 4.5% of fluid samples were positive. Culture sensitivity was 60.0%, specificity was 100.0%, PPV was 100.0%, and NPV was 97.9%. C. acnes qRT-PCR standard curve sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV was 60.0%, 90.3%, 25.0%, and 97.7% respectively for tissue specimens and 0%, 95.2%, 0%, and 95.2% respectively, for fluid specimens. For combination of culture and tissue qRT-PCR, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was 100%, 90.3%, 35.7%, and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion: We report that qRT-PCR for C. acnes identified the organism more frequently than conventional culture. While these findings demonstrate the potential utility of qRT-PCR, the likelihood of false positive results of qRT-PCR should be considered. Thus, qRT-PCR may be useful as an adjuvant to current gold standard workup of synovial fluid or tissue culture for the diagnosis of infection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量实时聚合酶链式反应可作为常规培养检测盂肱关节痤疮杆菌的有效辅助手段:对 100 例连续患者的研究。
目的:滑膜液或组织培养是目前诊断感染的金标准,但痤疮棒状杆菌(C. acnes)是肩关节PJI的常见病因,而且是一种臭名昭著的难缠生物。本研究的目的是将定量实时聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)与标准培养进行比较,以更快速、灵敏地鉴别盂肱关节中的痤疮丙酸杆菌。我们假设 qRT-PCR 在识别痤疮丙酸杆菌方面比标准培养更有效,并且在检测感染方面具有更高的灵敏度和特异性:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,对 100 名连续接受关节镜或开放式肩关节手术的患者进行了观察,并进行了已知的阳性和阴性对照。术中采集滑膜液和组织进行痤疮丙酸杆菌 qRT-PCR 检测,检测结果与金标准微生物学培养结果相同:临床复查显示,3 名患者(3%)培养结果呈阳性,其中无痤疮丙酸杆菌阳性。在痤疮丙酸杆菌 qRT-PCR 标准曲线检测的样本中,12.2% 的组织样本和 4.5% 的液体样本呈阳性。培养敏感性为 60.0%,特异性为 100.0%,PPV 为 100.0%,NPV 为 97.9%。组织样本中痤疮丙酸杆菌 qRT-PCR 标准曲线的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 60.0%、90.3%、25.0% 和 97.7%,液体样本中分别为 0%、95.2%、0% 和 95.2%。对于培养和组织 qRT-PCR 的组合,敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 100%、90.3%、35.7% 和 100%:我们的报告显示,qRT-PCR 检测痤疮丙酸杆菌比传统培养方法更容易识别。虽然这些研究结果表明了 qRT-PCR 的潜在作用,但应考虑到 qRT-PCR 出现假阳性结果的可能性。因此,qRT-PCR 可作为目前滑液或组织培养诊断感染的金标准检查的辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
期刊最新文献
A Large Ankle Mass in a Figure Skater: A Case Report. Diagnostic Value of Radiographic Singh Index Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in Diagnosing Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review. Double and Single Bundle in Athletes: A Comparison in Medium and Long-Term Rates to Return to Sport and Re-Injury. Investigating the Effect of Addition of Cervical Proprioceptive Training to Conventional Physiotherapy on Visual, Vestibular and Proprioceptive Dependency of Postural Control in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Is Arthroscopic Latarjet a Cost-Effective Procedure? A Decision Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1