Can redistribution of vaccine improve global welfare? Lessons from COVID-19.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1007/s10198-023-01665-9
Gunjan Kumari, Oindrila Dey
{"title":"Can redistribution of vaccine improve global welfare? Lessons from COVID-19.","authors":"Gunjan Kumari, Oindrila Dey","doi":"10.1007/s10198-023-01665-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The disparity in the distribution of COVID-19 vaccine has been recorded with more than 70% vaccination rate for high-income countries as compared to less than 40% for low-income countries. The low affordability of vaccines for the majority of low-income group invites the need for redistribution of vaccines. The disproportionate donation of vaccines across the globe motivates us to explore the incentive for the high-income group to redistribute. An exploratory analysis of cross-country COVID-19 vaccination distribution data shows that the countries which have received vaccines as donation has also contributed to vaccine wastage. This paper intends to provide a theoretical background for this counterintuitive observation using welfare analysis. We find that the market mechanism leads to a negative impact on global welfare due to redistribution. Only an invention with a defined redistribution mechanism may ensure an increase in global welfare. It is found that a critical value of redistribution mechanism reinforced by a minimum threshold level of income is essential to enhance welfare. The reduced form from the theoretical predictions is empirically validated with cross-country data on COVID-19 vaccination for all countries. As identified in theory, the internal support variables like political stability, government effectiveness, and health expenditure at the country level will impact global welfare. Therefore, when global cooperation is essential during a health crisis like COVID-19, improved internal coordination and intentions cannot be ignored.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1217-1238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-023-01665-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The disparity in the distribution of COVID-19 vaccine has been recorded with more than 70% vaccination rate for high-income countries as compared to less than 40% for low-income countries. The low affordability of vaccines for the majority of low-income group invites the need for redistribution of vaccines. The disproportionate donation of vaccines across the globe motivates us to explore the incentive for the high-income group to redistribute. An exploratory analysis of cross-country COVID-19 vaccination distribution data shows that the countries which have received vaccines as donation has also contributed to vaccine wastage. This paper intends to provide a theoretical background for this counterintuitive observation using welfare analysis. We find that the market mechanism leads to a negative impact on global welfare due to redistribution. Only an invention with a defined redistribution mechanism may ensure an increase in global welfare. It is found that a critical value of redistribution mechanism reinforced by a minimum threshold level of income is essential to enhance welfare. The reduced form from the theoretical predictions is empirically validated with cross-country data on COVID-19 vaccination for all countries. As identified in theory, the internal support variables like political stability, government effectiveness, and health expenditure at the country level will impact global welfare. Therefore, when global cooperation is essential during a health crisis like COVID-19, improved internal coordination and intentions cannot be ignored.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疫苗再分配能否改善全球福利?COVID-19 的经验教训。
根据记录,COVID-19 疫苗的分配存在差异,高收入国家的接种率超过 70%,而低收入国家的接种率不到 40%。大多数低收入群体难以负担疫苗费用,因此需要重新分配疫苗。全球疫苗捐赠比例失调促使我们探索高收入群体重新分配疫苗的动机。对跨国 COVID-19 疫苗接种分布数据的探索性分析表明,接受捐赠疫苗的国家也造成了疫苗浪费。本文旨在利用福利分析为这一反直觉的观察结果提供理论背景。我们发现,市场机制会因重新分配而对全球福利产生负面影响。只有具有明确的再分配机制的发明才能确保全球福利的增加。我们发现,由最低收入门槛水平强化的再分配机制的临界值对提高福利至关重要。所有国家 COVID-19 疫苗接种的跨国数据对理论预测的简化形式进行了实证验证。正如理论所指出的,国家层面的政治稳定性、政府效率和卫生支出等内部支持变量将影响全球福利。因此,在发生 COVID-19 这样的健康危机时,全球合作至关重要,改善内部协调和意图不容忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
期刊最新文献
Age, morbidity, and time to death: End-of-life expenditures on health care for the young-old population. Changes in disposable income of Polish households and growing trends in alcohol mortality. Explaining variations in government health expenditure: evidence from Canada. The impact of different perspectives on the cost-effectiveness of remote patient monitoring for patients with heart failure in different European countries. Is there a link between health care utilisation and subjective well-being? An exploratory study among older Danes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1