[The Study for Standardization of Dose Evaluation Method in Cone-beam CT].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 2024-04-20 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.6009/jjrt.2024-1435
Ryo Nakayama, Kosuke Matsubara
{"title":"[The Study for Standardization of Dose Evaluation Method in Cone-beam CT].","authors":"Ryo Nakayama, Kosuke Matsubara","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the dose evaluation methods by constructing simulation models using the Monte Carlo calculation code and propose an evaluation method for cone beam CT (CBCT) that ensures accuracy and practicality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) ver. 3.26 was used as the Monte Carlo calculation code. CBCT doses were measured by CB dose index (CBDI) and American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group 111 (TG111) methods. The CBDI was compared with the equilibrium doses obtained by the TG111 method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although CBDI was lower than equilibrium doses obtained by the TG111 method, its practicality was ensured because it can be measured using the dosimeter and phantom that are commonly used. In contrast, the TG111 method guarantees accuracy, but it is difficult to prepare a long phantom to obtain the equilibrium dose. The TG111 method with a phantom length of 15 cm underestimated the equilibrium dose by 20% compared to that with a phantom length of 45 cm that satisfies the dose equilibrium. Therefore, the equilibrium dose obtained by the TG111 method with a phantom length of 15 cm is multiplied by 1.20 to obtain the equilibrium dose equivalent to that with a phantom length of 45 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has proposed the dose evaluation method that combines guarantees accuracy and practicality in CBCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":" ","pages":"374-384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the dose evaluation methods by constructing simulation models using the Monte Carlo calculation code and propose an evaluation method for cone beam CT (CBCT) that ensures accuracy and practicality.

Methods: The Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) ver. 3.26 was used as the Monte Carlo calculation code. CBCT doses were measured by CB dose index (CBDI) and American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group 111 (TG111) methods. The CBDI was compared with the equilibrium doses obtained by the TG111 method.

Results: Although CBDI was lower than equilibrium doses obtained by the TG111 method, its practicality was ensured because it can be measured using the dosimeter and phantom that are commonly used. In contrast, the TG111 method guarantees accuracy, but it is difficult to prepare a long phantom to obtain the equilibrium dose. The TG111 method with a phantom length of 15 cm underestimated the equilibrium dose by 20% compared to that with a phantom length of 45 cm that satisfies the dose equilibrium. Therefore, the equilibrium dose obtained by the TG111 method with a phantom length of 15 cm is multiplied by 1.20 to obtain the equilibrium dose equivalent to that with a phantom length of 45 cm.

Conclusion: This study has proposed the dose evaluation method that combines guarantees accuracy and practicality in CBCT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[锥形束 CT 剂量评估方法标准化研究]。
目的:本研究旨在通过使用蒙特卡洛计算代码构建模拟模型,对剂量评估方法进行比较,并提出一种确保准确性和实用性的锥形束 CT(CBCT)评估方法:方法:采用粒子和重离子输运代码系统(PHITS)3.26 版作为蒙特卡洛计算模型。方法:使用粒子和重离子传输代码系统(PHITS)3.26 版作为蒙特卡罗计算代码。CBCT 剂量通过 CB 剂量指数(CBDI)和美国医学物理学家协会第 111 任务组(TG111)方法进行测量。CBDI 与 TG111 方法得出的平衡剂量进行了比较:尽管 CBDI 低于 TG111 方法获得的平衡剂量,但其实用性得到了保证,因为它可以使用常用的剂量计和模型进行测量。相比之下,TG111 方法虽然能保证精确度,但很难准备一个长模型来获得平衡剂量。与满足剂量平衡的 45 厘米幻影长度相比,15 厘米幻影长度的 TG111 方法低估了 20% 的平衡剂量。因此,用 TG111 方法得到的幻影长度为 15 厘米的平衡剂量乘以 1.20,就得到了相当于幻影长度为 45 厘米的平衡剂量:本研究提出的剂量评估方法兼顾了 CBCT 的准确性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Report Based on the Fiscal 2020 Diagnostic X-ray Equipment Questionnaire Survey]. [A Novel Dose Index for Effective Dose Estimation in Chest and Abdomen-Pelvis CT Examinations: Size-specific DLP]. [Comparison of Low-tube-voltage Images and Virtual Monoenergetic Images in CTA Imaging of the Head with Photon-counting Detector CT]. [Investigation of the Effect of Defining Quantitative Acceptance Criteria Using AI-based Retake Decision Support System on the Frequency and Causes of Retakes in Lateral Radiography of the Knee Joint]. [Evaluation of Effective Slice Thickness and Its In-plane and Distribution along Z-axis in High-resolution Computed Tomography].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1