Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the treatment of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy: A prospective, cohort, proof-of-concept study

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102943
Sasha Smith , Raveena Ravikumar , Catarina Carvalho , Pasha Normahani , Tristan Lane , Alun H Davies
{"title":"Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the treatment of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy: A prospective, cohort, proof-of-concept study","authors":"Sasha Smith ,&nbsp;Raveena Ravikumar ,&nbsp;Catarina Carvalho ,&nbsp;Pasha Normahani ,&nbsp;Tristan Lane ,&nbsp;Alun H Davies","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess a potential efficacy signal, safety and feasibility of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy as an adjunct to standard care in patients with diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this single-centre, prospective, cohort, proof-of-concept study, 25 patients with DSPN consented to at least one daily 30-minute NMES therapy session (Revitive® IX) for 10 weeks, with 20 patients completing the study. The primary outcome measure was nerve conductivity assessed using a nerve conduction study of the sural, superficial peroneal, common peroneal and tibial nerves at 10 weeks compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included superficial femoral artery (SFA) haemodynamics during NMES therapy compared to rest and quality-of-life at 10 weeks compared to baseline.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At 10 weeks, there were significant increases in sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude and conduction velocity (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), superficial peroneal sensory nerve action potential amplitude (<em>p</em> = 0.001) and conduction velocity (<em>p</em> = 0.002), common peroneal nerve conduction velocity (<em>p</em> = 0.004) and tibial nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude (<em>p</em> = 0.002) compared to baseline. SFA volume flow and time-averaged mean velocity significantly increased (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.003) during NMES compared to rest. Patient-reported Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument scores significantly decreased (<em>p</em> = 0.028) at 10 weeks compared to baseline. Three unrelated adverse events occurred, and 15 participants adhered to treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>NMES therapy as an adjunct to standard care for 10 weeks significantly increased lower limb nerve conductivity in patients with DSPN and may be beneficial in the treatment of DSPN.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"54 3","pages":"Article 102943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705324000017/pdfft?md5=6f09a8d3ff8df854c5cafac25d7d4f00&pid=1-s2.0-S0987705324000017-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705324000017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess a potential efficacy signal, safety and feasibility of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy as an adjunct to standard care in patients with diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN).

Methods

In this single-centre, prospective, cohort, proof-of-concept study, 25 patients with DSPN consented to at least one daily 30-minute NMES therapy session (Revitive® IX) for 10 weeks, with 20 patients completing the study. The primary outcome measure was nerve conductivity assessed using a nerve conduction study of the sural, superficial peroneal, common peroneal and tibial nerves at 10 weeks compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included superficial femoral artery (SFA) haemodynamics during NMES therapy compared to rest and quality-of-life at 10 weeks compared to baseline.

Results

At 10 weeks, there were significant increases in sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude and conduction velocity (p < 0.001), superficial peroneal sensory nerve action potential amplitude (p = 0.001) and conduction velocity (p = 0.002), common peroneal nerve conduction velocity (p = 0.004) and tibial nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude (p = 0.002) compared to baseline. SFA volume flow and time-averaged mean velocity significantly increased (p ≤ 0.003) during NMES compared to rest. Patient-reported Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument scores significantly decreased (p = 0.028) at 10 weeks compared to baseline. Three unrelated adverse events occurred, and 15 participants adhered to treatment.

Conclusions

NMES therapy as an adjunct to standard care for 10 weeks significantly increased lower limb nerve conductivity in patients with DSPN and may be beneficial in the treatment of DSPN.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经肌肉电刺激治疗糖尿病感觉运动性多发性神经病变:前瞻性、队列、概念验证研究
方法 在这项单中心、前瞻性、队列、概念验证研究中,25 名 DSPN 患者同意在 10 周内每天至少接受一次 30 分钟的神经肌肉电刺激疗法(Revitive® IX)治疗,其中 20 名患者完成了研究。主要结果指标是神经传导性,通过对腓肠神经、腓浅神经、腓总神经和胫神经进行神经传导研究,评估10周后与基线相比的神经传导性。次要结果包括 NMES 治疗期间股浅动脉 (SFA) 血流动力学与静息时的比较,以及 10 周后生活质量与基线时的比较。001)、腓浅感觉神经动作电位振幅(p = 0.001)和传导速度(p = 0.002)、腓总神经传导速度(p = 0.004)和胫神经复合肌动作电位振幅(p = 0.002)与基线相比均明显增加。与静息时相比,在 NMES 期间 SFA 体积流量和时间平均速度明显增加(p ≤ 0.003)。与基线相比,患者报告的密歇根神经病变筛查工具评分在 10 周时明显下降(p = 0.028)。结论NMES疗法作为标准护理的辅助疗法,持续10周可显著提高DSPN患者的下肢神经传导性,可能有益于DSPN的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
期刊最新文献
The epileptogenic network concept: Applications in the SEEG exploration of lesional focal epilepsies F-waves responses derived from low-intensity electrical stimulation: A method to explore split-hand pathogenesis Transcranial MEPs predict clinical outcome during minimally invasive dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy Twenty years of SIRPIDs: What have we learned? Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus modulation: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1