Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as an adjunctive therapy in heart failure: A systematic review

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102945
Sahand Ashrafpour , Manouchehr Ashrafpour
{"title":"Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as an adjunctive therapy in heart failure: A systematic review","authors":"Sahand Ashrafpour ,&nbsp;Manouchehr Ashrafpour","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neuromodulation therapy, like spinal cord stimulation (SCS), benefits individuals with chronic diseases, improving outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF). This systematic review aims to investigate the efficacy of SCS when used as an adjunctive therapy in HF. A systematic analysis of all studies that included SCS therapy in human participants with HF was conducted. After excluding studies not meeting specific criteria, 4 studies involving a total of 125 participants were selected. All participants had heart failure with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification ranging from 2.2 ± 0.4 to 3. The primary endpoints for assessment included the impact of SCS in HF-related symptoms, Left ventricular function, VO2 max, and NT-proBNP. All the studies could demonstrate safety and feasibility of SCS therapy, although the outcomes varied. Two studies reported improvement in NYHA classification, MLHFQ and QoL parameters after SCS. Concerning LVEF and VO2 max, only one study indicated positive changes. None of the studies found a significant change of NT-proBNP following SCS therapy. Given methodological variation, discrepancies in the results could be attributed to the diversity of the induction technique. Further studies are needed to develop a solid approach for employing SCS in human patients with HF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"54 3","pages":"Article 102945"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705324000030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuromodulation therapy, like spinal cord stimulation (SCS), benefits individuals with chronic diseases, improving outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF). This systematic review aims to investigate the efficacy of SCS when used as an adjunctive therapy in HF. A systematic analysis of all studies that included SCS therapy in human participants with HF was conducted. After excluding studies not meeting specific criteria, 4 studies involving a total of 125 participants were selected. All participants had heart failure with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification ranging from 2.2 ± 0.4 to 3. The primary endpoints for assessment included the impact of SCS in HF-related symptoms, Left ventricular function, VO2 max, and NT-proBNP. All the studies could demonstrate safety and feasibility of SCS therapy, although the outcomes varied. Two studies reported improvement in NYHA classification, MLHFQ and QoL parameters after SCS. Concerning LVEF and VO2 max, only one study indicated positive changes. None of the studies found a significant change of NT-proBNP following SCS therapy. Given methodological variation, discrepancies in the results could be attributed to the diversity of the induction technique. Further studies are needed to develop a solid approach for employing SCS in human patients with HF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓刺激作为心力衰竭辅助疗法的疗效:系统综述
神经调控疗法,如脊髓刺激疗法(SCS),可使慢性病患者受益,改善心力衰竭(HF)患者的预后。本系统性综述旨在研究脊髓刺激作为心力衰竭辅助疗法的疗效。研究人员对所有针对心力衰竭患者的 SCS 治疗研究进行了系统分析。在排除了不符合特定标准的研究后,选出了 4 项研究,共涉及 125 名参与者。评估的主要终点包括 SCS 对 HF 相关症状、左心室功能、最大 VO2 和 NT-proBNP 的影响。尽管结果各不相同,但所有研究都证明了 SCS 治疗的安全性和可行性。两项研究报告了 SCS 治疗后 NYHA 分级、MLHFQ 和 QoL 参数的改善情况。关于 LVEF 和 VO2 max,只有一项研究表明出现了积极变化。没有一项研究发现 SCS 治疗后 NT-proBNP 有明显变化。鉴于方法上的差异,结果的差异可能归因于诱导技术的多样性。还需要进一步研究,才能为人类高血压患者采用 SCS 制定出可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
期刊最新文献
The epileptogenic network concept: Applications in the SEEG exploration of lesional focal epilepsies F-waves responses derived from low-intensity electrical stimulation: A method to explore split-hand pathogenesis Transcranial MEPs predict clinical outcome during minimally invasive dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy Twenty years of SIRPIDs: What have we learned? Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus modulation: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1