Parastoo Iranparvar, Amir Ghasemi, Pouria Iranparvar
{"title":"Adhesion of glass ionomer cements to primary dentin using a universal adhesive.","authors":"Parastoo Iranparvar, Amir Ghasemi, Pouria Iranparvar","doi":"10.17219/dmp/131066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glass ionomers are widely used for restoring carious primary teeth. However, their ability to bond to primary dentin is considered a challenge in pediatric dentistry.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Hv-GIC) to primary dentin using a universal adhesive.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty human primary maxillary canines were cut in half and prepared for the μSBS test. The specimens (N = 60) were assigned to 6 groups. Three groups were defined for RMGI (FUJI II LC) and 3 groups for Hv-GIC (EQUIA Forte): with an immediately curing adhesive (G-Premio); with a delayed curing adhesive; and without an adhesive (control group). After preparing the dentin surfaces, the glass ionomers were bonded using Tygon® tubes with an internal diameter of 0.7 mm. The μSBS test was performed, and the data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Additionally, the failure modes were determined using a stereomicroscope. Six specimens, one for each study group, were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis to observe the glass ionomer-dentin interface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The type of glass ionomer did not have a significant effect on the μSBS (p = 0.305). Groups that received universal adhesive application prior to glass ionomer exhibited a significantly higher μSBS (p < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between the immediately curing and delayed curing groups (p = 0.157). The predominant failure mode was mixed failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher bond strength of glass ionomers to primary teeth can be achieved by using universal adhesives, which, in addition to the proven benefits of glass ionomers, can improve their clinical success.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/131066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Glass ionomers are widely used for restoring carious primary teeth. However, their ability to bond to primary dentin is considered a challenge in pediatric dentistry.
Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Hv-GIC) to primary dentin using a universal adhesive.
Material and methods: Thirty human primary maxillary canines were cut in half and prepared for the μSBS test. The specimens (N = 60) were assigned to 6 groups. Three groups were defined for RMGI (FUJI II LC) and 3 groups for Hv-GIC (EQUIA Forte): with an immediately curing adhesive (G-Premio); with a delayed curing adhesive; and without an adhesive (control group). After preparing the dentin surfaces, the glass ionomers were bonded using Tygon® tubes with an internal diameter of 0.7 mm. The μSBS test was performed, and the data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Additionally, the failure modes were determined using a stereomicroscope. Six specimens, one for each study group, were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis to observe the glass ionomer-dentin interface.
Results: The type of glass ionomer did not have a significant effect on the μSBS (p = 0.305). Groups that received universal adhesive application prior to glass ionomer exhibited a significantly higher μSBS (p < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between the immediately curing and delayed curing groups (p = 0.157). The predominant failure mode was mixed failure.
Conclusions: Higher bond strength of glass ionomers to primary teeth can be achieved by using universal adhesives, which, in addition to the proven benefits of glass ionomers, can improve their clinical success.