Approximation in scour depth around spur dikes using novel hybrid ensemble data-driven model.

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Water Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.2166/wst.2024.025
Balraj Singh, Vijay K Minocha
{"title":"Approximation in scour depth around spur dikes using novel hybrid ensemble data-driven model.","authors":"Balraj Singh, Vijay K Minocha","doi":"10.2166/wst.2024.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scouring process near spur dikes poses a threat to riverbank stability, making it crucial for river engineering to accurately calculate the maximum scour depth. However, determining the maximum scour depth has been challenging due to the intricacy of scour phenomena surrounding these structures. This research introduces a reliable ensemble data-driven model by hybridizing random tree (RT) using additive regression (AR), bagging (B), and random subspace (RSS) for predicting scour depths around spur dikes. A database of 154 experimental observations was collected from literature, with 103 and 51 observations used for training and testing subsets, respectively. A dimensionless analysis was performed on the collected dataset, selecting four variables as input variables (v/v<sub>s</sub>, y/l, l/d<sub>50</sub>, and Fd<sub>50</sub>) and d<sub>s</sub>/l as response variables. The performance comparison demonstrates that B_AR_RT has a better coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.9693, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.1305, and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.9692. Finally, a comparison of the best hybrid model has been done with previous studies, and sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the most influential parameter for predicting the scour depth around spur dikes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"89 4","pages":"962-975"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/wst_2024_025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scouring process near spur dikes poses a threat to riverbank stability, making it crucial for river engineering to accurately calculate the maximum scour depth. However, determining the maximum scour depth has been challenging due to the intricacy of scour phenomena surrounding these structures. This research introduces a reliable ensemble data-driven model by hybridizing random tree (RT) using additive regression (AR), bagging (B), and random subspace (RSS) for predicting scour depths around spur dikes. A database of 154 experimental observations was collected from literature, with 103 and 51 observations used for training and testing subsets, respectively. A dimensionless analysis was performed on the collected dataset, selecting four variables as input variables (v/vs, y/l, l/d50, and Fd50) and ds/l as response variables. The performance comparison demonstrates that B_AR_RT has a better coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9693, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.1305, and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.9692. Finally, a comparison of the best hybrid model has been done with previous studies, and sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the most influential parameter for predicting the scour depth around spur dikes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用新型混合集合数据驱动模型近似计算支堤周围的冲刷深度。
支堤附近的冲刷过程对河岸稳定性构成威胁,因此准确计算最大冲刷深度对河道工程至关重要。然而,由于这些结构周围的冲刷现象错综复杂,确定最大冲刷深度一直具有挑战性。本研究通过混合使用加性回归(AR)、套袋(B)和随机子空间(RSS)的随机树(RT),引入了一种可靠的集合数据驱动模型,用于预测支堤周围的冲刷深度。从文献中收集了 154 个实验观测数据,其中 103 个和 51 个观测数据分别用于训练子集和测试子集。对收集到的数据集进行了无量纲分析,选择四个变量作为输入变量(v/vs、y/l、l/d50 和 Fd50),ds/l 作为响应变量。性能比较结果表明,B_AR_RT 的判定系数 (R2) 为 0.9693,均方根误差 (RMSE) 为 0.1305,纳什-苏克里夫效率 (NSE) 为 0.9692。最后,将最佳混合模型与之前的研究进行了比较,并进行了敏感性分析,以确定对预测支堤周围冲刷深度影响最大的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Science and Technology
Water Science and Technology 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
366
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Sewage sludge management and enhanced energy recovery using anaerobic digestion: an insight. Spatial differences of dissolved organic matter composition and humification in an artificial lake. Wetland systems for water pollution control. Activated persulfate for efficient bisphenol A degradation via nitrogen-doped Fe/Mn bimetallic biochar. Assessment of water quality in wells and springs across various districts of Taza City, Morocco.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1