Explicit and implicit abilities in humor processing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Social Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1080/17470919.2024.2315817
Pauline Gury, Maximilien Moulin, Raphaëlle Laroye, Marine Montazel, Marine Trachino, Pauline Narme, Nathalie Ehrlé
{"title":"Explicit and implicit abilities in humor processing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Pauline Gury, Maximilien Moulin, Raphaëlle Laroye, Marine Montazel, Marine Trachino, Pauline Narme, Nathalie Ehrlé","doi":"10.1080/17470919.2024.2315817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sociocognitive impairment is well known in the relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis (RR-MS). The purpose of the present study was to assess explicit and implicit humor abilities in this population. Based on clinical observation and contrary to the current cognitive model, we hypothesized that implicit performances (happy facial expressions) would be better than explicit ones (humor judgment assessed by explicit humor comprehension, subjective feeling of amusement as a conscious appreciation of funniness, and verbal justifications of funniness). Twenty-five RR-MS patients and twenty-five healthy participants completed the tasks. Their face was filmed during humor ratings. Patients' results suggest that 32% of them showed an impairment in explicit humor comprehension, with normal facial expressions. Both groups found great difficulty in justifying the cause of their amusement. All these results may suggest the existence of a supplementary implicit pathway in humor processing. The preservation of this implicit pathway may be advantageous for future remediation. Contrary to the current model, we found that the subjective feeling of amusement was preserved when comprehension was impaired. Further studies will be needed to clarify this component, and adjust the theoretical modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":49511,"journal":{"name":"Social Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2024.2315817","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sociocognitive impairment is well known in the relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis (RR-MS). The purpose of the present study was to assess explicit and implicit humor abilities in this population. Based on clinical observation and contrary to the current cognitive model, we hypothesized that implicit performances (happy facial expressions) would be better than explicit ones (humor judgment assessed by explicit humor comprehension, subjective feeling of amusement as a conscious appreciation of funniness, and verbal justifications of funniness). Twenty-five RR-MS patients and twenty-five healthy participants completed the tasks. Their face was filmed during humor ratings. Patients' results suggest that 32% of them showed an impairment in explicit humor comprehension, with normal facial expressions. Both groups found great difficulty in justifying the cause of their amusement. All these results may suggest the existence of a supplementary implicit pathway in humor processing. The preservation of this implicit pathway may be advantageous for future remediation. Contrary to the current model, we found that the subjective feeling of amusement was preserved when comprehension was impaired. Further studies will be needed to clarify this component, and adjust the theoretical modeling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性多发性硬化症患者在幽默处理方面的显性和隐性能力。
众所周知,复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RR-MS)患者存在社会认知障碍。本研究旨在评估该人群的显性和隐性幽默能力。根据临床观察,并与当前的认知模型相反,我们假设内隐幽默能力(快乐的面部表情)将优于外显幽默能力(通过外显幽默理解能力、作为有意识的趣味性欣赏的主观娱乐感以及对趣味性的口头辩解来评估幽默判断能力)。25 名 RR-MS 患者和 25 名健康参与者完成了任务。在进行幽默评分时,他们的面部被拍摄下来。患者的研究结果表明,32%的患者在面部表情正常的情况下,对幽默的明确理解出现障碍。这两组人都很难证明自己的娱乐原因。所有这些结果都表明,在幽默处理过程中存在一条补充性的内隐途径。保留这一内隐途径可能有利于未来的补救。与目前的模型相反,我们发现当理解能力受损时,主观上的娱乐感仍然存在。我们需要进一步的研究来澄清这部分内容,并调整理论模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Neuroscience
Social Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Neuroscience features original empirical Research Papers as well as targeted Reviews, Commentaries and Fast Track Brief Reports that examine how the brain mediates social behavior, social cognition, social interactions and relationships, group social dynamics, and related topics that deal with social/interpersonal psychology and neurobiology. Multi-paper symposia and special topic issues are organized and presented regularly as well. The goal of Social Neuroscience is to provide a place to publish empirical articles that intend to further our understanding of the neural mechanisms contributing to the development and maintenance of social behaviors, or to understanding how these mechanisms are disrupted in clinical disorders.
期刊最新文献
Social and perceptual decisions predict differences in face inversion neural correlates: Implications for development and face perception methods. The impact of social isolation on depression-like behavior in carioca high- and low-conditioned freezing rats. Pair bond quality influences social conditioned place preference expression, passive coping behavior, and central oxytocin receptor expression following partner loss in male prairie voles. Neuroscience of social touch: Emerging directions and challenges. A common neural response to perceiving but not implicitly regulating infant and adult affect in postpartum mothers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1