Impression of Primary Care Follow-Up After a PICU Admission: A Pilot Survey of Primary Care Pediatricians.

Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2024-02-28 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001055
Sarah Harris-Kober, Alyssa Motzel, Scott Grant, Brian Berman, Lauren Yagiela
{"title":"Impression of Primary Care Follow-Up After a PICU Admission: A Pilot Survey of Primary Care Pediatricians.","authors":"Sarah Harris-Kober, Alyssa Motzel, Scott Grant, Brian Berman, Lauren Yagiela","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The majority of PICU general follow-up occurs with primary care providers. Our objective was to investigate primary care pediatricians': 1) comfort with and barriers to caring for children after a PICU admission, 2) knowledge of and screening for post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics (PICS-P), and 3) resource needs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pilot cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Metropolitan Detroit, Michigan from September 2022 to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Primary care pediatricians.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>The survey included 15 questions on provider demographics, comfort with and barriers to caring for children after a PICU admission, knowledge of and screening practices for PICS-P, and resource needs. The median values for continuous data and frequencies for categorical data were calculated. The survey response rate was 17% (26/152). The median age was 38.5 years (interquartile range 34-52 yr) and 19 of 26 (73%) were female. In case studies, 26 of 26 (100%) were \"very comfortable\" resuming care for a patient with a straightforward bronchiolitis PICU admission while 8 of 26 participants (31%) were \"somewhat uncomfortable\" and 1 of 26 (4%) was \"not at all comfortable\" with caring for a patient after a complex acute respiratory distress syndrome PICU admission. Seven of 26 participants (27%) were familiar with the term \"post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics.\" Over 50% screened for four of five PICS-P domains. Key barriers were care coordination with specialists, discomfort or difficulties with managing new home equipment, and inadequate or missing documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, approximately one-third of primary care pediatricians had knowledge of PICS-P. Participants experienced numerous care barriers. Our findings suggest future research could engage improved study methods and designs, and focus on interventions to support primary care-provided PICU follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10904095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The majority of PICU general follow-up occurs with primary care providers. Our objective was to investigate primary care pediatricians': 1) comfort with and barriers to caring for children after a PICU admission, 2) knowledge of and screening for post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics (PICS-P), and 3) resource needs.

Design: Pilot cross-sectional survey study.

Setting: Metropolitan Detroit, Michigan from September 2022 to March 2023.

Subjects: Primary care pediatricians.

Measurement and main results: The survey included 15 questions on provider demographics, comfort with and barriers to caring for children after a PICU admission, knowledge of and screening practices for PICS-P, and resource needs. The median values for continuous data and frequencies for categorical data were calculated. The survey response rate was 17% (26/152). The median age was 38.5 years (interquartile range 34-52 yr) and 19 of 26 (73%) were female. In case studies, 26 of 26 (100%) were "very comfortable" resuming care for a patient with a straightforward bronchiolitis PICU admission while 8 of 26 participants (31%) were "somewhat uncomfortable" and 1 of 26 (4%) was "not at all comfortable" with caring for a patient after a complex acute respiratory distress syndrome PICU admission. Seven of 26 participants (27%) were familiar with the term "post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics." Over 50% screened for four of five PICS-P domains. Key barriers were care coordination with specialists, discomfort or difficulties with managing new home equipment, and inadequate or missing documentation.

Conclusions: In this pilot study, approximately one-third of primary care pediatricians had knowledge of PICS-P. Participants experienced numerous care barriers. Our findings suggest future research could engage improved study methods and designs, and focus on interventions to support primary care-provided PICU follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科重症监护室入院后对基层医疗机构随访的印象:儿科初级保健医生试点调查。
目的:大多数 PICU 一般随访都是由初级保健提供者进行的。我们的目的是调查初级保健儿科医生的以下情况1)对 PICU 入院后儿童护理的舒适度和障碍;2)对儿科重症监护后综合征(PICS-P)的了解和筛查;3)资源需求:设计:试验性横断面调查研究:研究地点:密歇根州底特律大都会,时间为 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月:测量和主要结果:调查包括 15 个问题,涉及医疗服务提供者的人口统计学特征、PICU 入院后护理儿童的舒适度和障碍、PICS-P 的知识和筛查方法以及资源需求。连续数据计算中位值,分类数据计算频数。调查回复率为 17%(26/152)。年龄中位数为 38.5 岁(四分位间范围为 34-52 岁),26 人中有 19 人(73%)为女性。在病例研究中,26 位参与者中有 26 位(100%)对重新开始护理一名在 PICU 入院的直接支气管炎患者感到 "非常舒适",而 26 位参与者中有 8 位(31%)对护理一名在 PICU 入院的复杂急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者感到 "有些不舒适",26 位参与者中有 1 位(4%)对护理一名在 PICU 入院的复杂急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者感到 "完全不舒适"。26 位参与者中有 7 位(27%)熟悉 "儿科重症监护后综合征 "这一术语。在 PICS-P 的五个领域中,50% 以上的参与者对其中四个领域进行了筛查。主要障碍是与专科医生的护理协调、管理新家用设备时的不适或困难,以及文件不足或缺失:在这项试点研究中,约有三分之一的初级保健儿科医生了解 PICS-P。参与者遇到了许多护理障碍。我们的研究结果表明,未来的研究可以改进研究方法和设计,并重点关注支持初级保健提供的 PICU 随访的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Statistical Power and Performance of Strategies to Analyze Composites of Survival and Duration of Ventilation in Clinical Trials. Erratum: Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Erratum. Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Erratum. Characterizing the Use of Time-Limited Trials in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Prospective, Single-Center Observational Study. Utility of Skin Tone on Pulse Oximetry in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1