Conditioned Medium Treatment for the Improvement of Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-Analysis Study.

Razieh Hajisoltani, Mona Taghizadeh, Michael R Hamblin, Fatemeh Ramezani
{"title":"Conditioned Medium Treatment for the Improvement of Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-Analysis Study.","authors":"Razieh Hajisoltani, Mona Taghizadeh, Michael R Hamblin, Fatemeh Ramezani","doi":"10.2174/011574888X283713240129095031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While there is no certain treatment for spinal cord injury (SCI), stem cellbased therapy may be an attractive alternative, but the survival and differentiation of cells in the host tissue are poor. Conditioned medium (CM) has several beneficial effects on cells.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this meta-analysis study, we examined the effect of CM on SCI treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After searching on MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Science, first and secondary screening were performed based on title, abstract, and full text. The data were extracted from the included studies, and meta-analysis was performed using STATA.14 software. A standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval was used to report findings. Quality control and subgroup analysis were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from 52 articles and 61 separate experiments showed that CM had a significantly strong effect on improving motor function after SCI (SMD = 2.58; 95% CI: 2.17 to 2.98; p < 0.001) and also analysis of data from 12 articles demonstrated that CM reduced the expression of GFAP marker (SMD = -4.16; p < 0.0001) compared to SCI group without any treatment. Subgroup analysis showed that treatment with CM of neural stem cells was better than CM of mesenchymal stem cells. It was more effective after a mild lesion than a moderate or severe one. The improvement was more pronounced with <4 weeks than >4 weeks follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CM had a significant effect in improving motor function after SCI, especially in cases of mild lesions. It has been observed that if CM originates from the neural stem cells, it has a more significant effect than mesenchymal cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":93971,"journal":{"name":"Current stem cell research & therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current stem cell research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011574888X283713240129095031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While there is no certain treatment for spinal cord injury (SCI), stem cellbased therapy may be an attractive alternative, but the survival and differentiation of cells in the host tissue are poor. Conditioned medium (CM) has several beneficial effects on cells.

Objective: In this meta-analysis study, we examined the effect of CM on SCI treatment.

Methods: After searching on MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Science, first and secondary screening were performed based on title, abstract, and full text. The data were extracted from the included studies, and meta-analysis was performed using STATA.14 software. A standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval was used to report findings. Quality control and subgroup analysis were also performed.

Results: The results from 52 articles and 61 separate experiments showed that CM had a significantly strong effect on improving motor function after SCI (SMD = 2.58; 95% CI: 2.17 to 2.98; p < 0.001) and also analysis of data from 12 articles demonstrated that CM reduced the expression of GFAP marker (SMD = -4.16; p < 0.0001) compared to SCI group without any treatment. Subgroup analysis showed that treatment with CM of neural stem cells was better than CM of mesenchymal stem cells. It was more effective after a mild lesion than a moderate or severe one. The improvement was more pronounced with <4 weeks than >4 weeks follow-up.

Conclusion: CM had a significant effect in improving motor function after SCI, especially in cases of mild lesions. It has been observed that if CM originates from the neural stem cells, it has a more significant effect than mesenchymal cells.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善脊髓损伤后功能恢复的条件介质治疗:一项元分析研究。
背景:虽然脊髓损伤(SCI)尚无确定的治疗方法,但基于干细胞的疗法可能是一种有吸引力的替代疗法,但细胞在宿主组织中的存活率和分化率很低。条件培养基(CM)对细胞有多种有益作用:在这项荟萃分析研究中,我们考察了 CM 对 SCI 治疗的影响:方法:在 MEDLINE、SCOPUS、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 上检索后,根据标题、摘要和全文进行初筛和复筛。从纳入的研究中提取数据,并使用 STATA.14 软件进行荟萃分析。报告结果时使用了标准化平均差(SMD)和 95% 置信区间。此外,还进行了质量控制和亚组分析:来自 52 篇文章和 61 个独立实验的结果表明,CM 对改善 SCI 后的运动功能有显著的强效作用(SMD = 2.58;95% CI:2.17 至 2.98;p < 0.001),同时对 12 篇文章的数据进行的分析表明,与未接受任何治疗的 SCI 组相比,CM 可减少 GFAP 标记的表达(SMD = -4.16;p < 0.0001)。分组分析显示,神经干细胞CM治疗效果优于间充质干细胞CM。轻度病变比中度或重度病变更有效。结论:结论:CM对改善脊髓损伤后的运动功能有明显效果,尤其是对轻度损伤的病例。据观察,如果CM源自神经干细胞,其效果比间充质细胞更显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of miR-98/IL-6/STAT3 on Autophagy and Apoptosis of Cardiac Stem Cells Under Hypoxic Conditions In vitro. Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Exosome Regulates Intestinal Type 2 Immunity. Kartogenin Induces Chondrogenesis in Cartilage Progenitor Cells and Attenuates Cell Hypertrophy in Marrow-Derived Stromal Cells. The Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis. The Role of Stem Cell Therapies in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1