Lower limb squat biomechanics and select clinical measures in chronic ankle instability

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Clinical Biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106211
David Werner , Lauren Casey , Ethan Myers , Joaquin A. Barrios
{"title":"Lower limb squat biomechanics and select clinical measures in chronic ankle instability","authors":"David Werner ,&nbsp;Lauren Casey ,&nbsp;Ethan Myers ,&nbsp;Joaquin A. Barrios","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Individuals with chronic ankle instability often present with clinical and biomechanical abnormalities, however squat biomechanics have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare select clinical assessments and squat biomechanics between individuals with and without chronic ankle instability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifteen individuals with chronic ankle instability and a matched control group were studied. A weight-bearing dorsiflexion lunge test, foot posture, and an in-line half-kneeling motor control test for core stability were assessed. Lower limb 3D bilateral and unilateral squat biomechanics were captured. Groups, limbs and squat tasks were compared using an alpha of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Individuals with chronic ankle instability had less static weight-bearing dorsiflexion and failed the core stability test more frequently, but did not differ in foot morphology compared to the controls. When squatting, those with chronic ankle instability demonstrated reduced peak ankle dorsiflexion angles and moments in the involved limb (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.04) during single limb squats and had interlimb differences in ankle dorsiflexion angle as well as hip and knee kinetics (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.04) during double limb squats. In those with chronic ankle instability, there was less overall motion, but higher kinetic demands in single limb versus double leg squatting (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Individuals with chronic ankle instability had impaired weight-bearing dorsiflexion and showed impaired core stability more often, which accompanied altered squatting mechanics in both variations. Within the limbs with chronic ankle instability, single limb squats showed lesser kinematic demands but higher kinetic demands than double limb squatting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324000433/pdfft?md5=e7dc3443d3daff98c4328501dfb2d477&pid=1-s2.0-S0268003324000433-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324000433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Individuals with chronic ankle instability often present with clinical and biomechanical abnormalities, however squat biomechanics have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare select clinical assessments and squat biomechanics between individuals with and without chronic ankle instability.

Methods

Fifteen individuals with chronic ankle instability and a matched control group were studied. A weight-bearing dorsiflexion lunge test, foot posture, and an in-line half-kneeling motor control test for core stability were assessed. Lower limb 3D bilateral and unilateral squat biomechanics were captured. Groups, limbs and squat tasks were compared using an alpha of 0.05.

Findings

Individuals with chronic ankle instability had less static weight-bearing dorsiflexion and failed the core stability test more frequently, but did not differ in foot morphology compared to the controls. When squatting, those with chronic ankle instability demonstrated reduced peak ankle dorsiflexion angles and moments in the involved limb (p < 0.04) during single limb squats and had interlimb differences in ankle dorsiflexion angle as well as hip and knee kinetics (p < 0.04) during double limb squats. In those with chronic ankle instability, there was less overall motion, but higher kinetic demands in single limb versus double leg squatting (p < 0.03).

Interpretation

Individuals with chronic ankle instability had impaired weight-bearing dorsiflexion and showed impaired core stability more often, which accompanied altered squatting mechanics in both variations. Within the limbs with chronic ankle instability, single limb squats showed lesser kinematic demands but higher kinetic demands than double limb squatting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性踝关节不稳的下肢深蹲生物力学和选定临床测量方法
背景患有慢性踝关节不稳定的人通常会出现临床和生物力学异常,但尚未对深蹲生物力学进行研究。本研究的目的是比较患有和未患有慢性踝关节不稳定的患者的临床评估和深蹲生物力学。方法研究了 15 名患有慢性踝关节不稳定的患者和一个匹配的对照组。研究人员评估了负重背屈下蹲测试、足部姿势以及针对核心稳定性的直立半跪运动控制测试。还采集了下肢三维双侧和单侧深蹲生物力学数据。与对照组相比,慢性踝关节不稳定患者的静态负重背屈较小,核心稳定性测试失败的频率较高,但在足部形态上没有差异。下蹲时,患有慢性踝关节不稳定的人在单肢下蹲时,受累肢体的踝关节背屈角度和力矩峰值降低(p < 0.04),在双肢下蹲时,踝关节背屈角度以及髋关节和膝关节动力学存在肢体间差异(p < 0.04)。慢性踝关节不稳定患者的整体运动量较小,但单肢深蹲与双腿深蹲相比,动能要求更高(p < 0.03)。在患有慢性踝关节不稳定的肢体中,单肢深蹲的运动学要求低于双肢深蹲,但动力学要求高于双肢深蹲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Mid-vastus approach induces milder short-term effects on postural control compared to parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Between-limb difference in peak knee flexion angle can identify persons post-stroke with Stiff-Knee gait Fall assessment in healthy older adults: Approach using rambling-trembling decomposition method Biomechanical analysis of the effect of postero-latero-central tibial plateau fractures in the knee joint: Can posterior soft tissues prevent instability? A finite element study. Biomechanical modelling of indirect decompression in oblique lumbar intervertebral fusions – A finite element study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1