The Complexities in the R&D Competition Model with Spillover Effects in the Supply Chain

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Complexity Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1155/2024/3152363
Jianli Xiao, Hanli Xiao
{"title":"The Complexities in the R&D Competition Model with Spillover Effects in the Supply Chain","authors":"Jianli Xiao,&nbsp;Hanli Xiao","doi":"10.1155/2024/3152363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to investigate the research and development (R&amp;D) competition within the supply chain, focusing on two aspects: R&amp;D competition at the manufacturing level and competition in pricing strategies. This paper establishes a dynamic game model of R&amp;D competition, comprising two manufacturers and two retailers, with both manufacturers exhibiting bounded rationality. The key findings are as follows: (1) an increase in the adjustment speed positively affects the chaotic nature of the R&amp;D competition system, leading to a state of disorder. This chaotic state has adverse implications for manufacturing profitability. (2) The spillover effect exhibits a positive relationship with the level of chaos in the R&amp;D competition system. A greater spillover effect contributes to a more turbulent environment, which subsequently impacts the profitability of manufacturers. (3) R&amp;D cost parameters exert a positive influence on the stability of the R&amp;D competition system. When the system reaches a state of equilibrium, an escalation in the R&amp;D cost parameters poses a threat to manufacturer profitability. (4) Retailer costs play a detrimental role in the stability of the R&amp;D competition system. As retailer costs increase, there is a decline in R&amp;D levels, thereby diminishing manufacturer profitability. (5) To mitigate the chaotic state, we propose the implementation of the time-delayed feedback control (TDFC) method, which reflects a more stable state in the R&amp;D competition system.</p>","PeriodicalId":50653,"journal":{"name":"Complexity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3152363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the research and development (R&D) competition within the supply chain, focusing on two aspects: R&D competition at the manufacturing level and competition in pricing strategies. This paper establishes a dynamic game model of R&D competition, comprising two manufacturers and two retailers, with both manufacturers exhibiting bounded rationality. The key findings are as follows: (1) an increase in the adjustment speed positively affects the chaotic nature of the R&D competition system, leading to a state of disorder. This chaotic state has adverse implications for manufacturing profitability. (2) The spillover effect exhibits a positive relationship with the level of chaos in the R&D competition system. A greater spillover effect contributes to a more turbulent environment, which subsequently impacts the profitability of manufacturers. (3) R&D cost parameters exert a positive influence on the stability of the R&D competition system. When the system reaches a state of equilibrium, an escalation in the R&D cost parameters poses a threat to manufacturer profitability. (4) Retailer costs play a detrimental role in the stability of the R&D competition system. As retailer costs increase, there is a decline in R&D levels, thereby diminishing manufacturer profitability. (5) To mitigate the chaotic state, we propose the implementation of the time-delayed feedback control (TDFC) method, which reflects a more stable state in the R&D competition system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有供应链溢出效应的研发竞争模型的复杂性
本研究旨在调查供应链中的研发(R&D)竞争,重点关注两个方面:制造层面的研发竞争和定价策略竞争。本文建立了一个研发竞争的动态博弈模型,包括两个制造商和两个零售商,两个制造商都表现出有限理性。主要结论如下(1) 调整速度的增加会对 R&D 竞争体系的混乱性产生积极影响,从而导致无序状态。这种无序状态会对制造业的盈利能力产生不利影响。(2) 溢出效应与研发竞争体系的混乱程度呈正相关。溢出效应越大,环境越动荡,进而影响制造商的盈利能力。(3)研发成本参数对研发竞争体系的稳定性有正向影响。当系统达到平衡状态时,研发成本参数的上升会对制造商的盈利能力构成威胁。(4)零售商成本对研发竞争体系的稳定性起不利作用。随着零售商成本的增加,R&D 水平会下降,从而削弱制造商的盈利能力。(5) 为缓解混沌状态,我们提出了实施延时反馈控制(TDFC)的方法,该方法反映了 R&D 竞争系统中较为稳定的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complexity
Complexity 综合性期刊-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
595
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Complexity is a cross-disciplinary journal focusing on the rapidly expanding science of complex adaptive systems. The purpose of the journal is to advance the science of complexity. Articles may deal with such methodological themes as chaos, genetic algorithms, cellular automata, neural networks, and evolutionary game theory. Papers treating applications in any area of natural science or human endeavor are welcome, and especially encouraged are papers integrating conceptual themes and applications that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. Complexity is not meant to serve as a forum for speculation and vague analogies between words like “chaos,” “self-organization,” and “emergence” that are often used in completely different ways in science and in daily life.
期刊最新文献
Western North American Cruise Shipping Network: Space Structure and System Improving the Machine Learning Stock Trading System: An N-Period Volatility Labeling and Instance Selection Technique Who Leads Trends on Q&A Platforms? Identifying and Analyzing Trend Discoverers Transient Stability Assessment Model With Sample Selection Method Based on Spatial Distribution Stability Analysis and Simulation of Diffusive Vaccinated Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1