(111) Request for a binding decision on whether Gymnosporia (Wight & Arn.) Benth. & Hook. f. (Celastraceae) and Gymnospora (Chodat) J.F.B. Pastore (Polygalaceae) are sufficiently alike to be confused

IF 3 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Taxon Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1002/tax.13157
José Floriano Barêa Pastore, Jefferson Prado
{"title":"(111) Request for a binding decision on whether Gymnosporia (Wight & Arn.) Benth. & Hook. f. (Celastraceae) and Gymnospora (Chodat) J.F.B. Pastore (Polygalaceae) are sufficiently alike to be confused","authors":"José Floriano Barêa Pastore, Jefferson Prado","doi":"10.1002/tax.13157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>(111) <b><i>Gymnosporia</i></b> (Wight &amp; Arn.) Benth. &amp; Hook. f. (1862) [Angiosp.: <i>Celastr</i>.]</p>\n<p><b><i>Gymnospora</i></b> (Chodat) J.F.B. Pastore (2013) [Angiosp.: <i>Polygal</i>.]</p>\n<p><i>Gymnospora</i> (Chodat) J.F.B. Pastore (<i>Polygalaceae</i>), a small genus including two species, both endemic to Brazil, was elevated to generic status by Pastore (in Novon 22: 305. 2013). Previously this taxon had been recognized as a section of <i>Polygala</i> by Chodat (in Biblioth. Universelle Rev. Suisse 25: 698. 1891; in Mém. Soc. Phys. Genève 31(2), no. 2: 87. 1893) or as a subgenus by Paiva (in Fontqueria 50: 147. 1998). When Pastore (l.c.) decided to adopt <i>Gymnospora</i> as a generic name, the similarity with <i>Gymnosporia</i> (Wight &amp; Arn.) Benth. &amp; Hook. f. (Gen. Pl. 1: 359, 365. 1862), nom. cons. (<i>Celastraceae</i>) was certainly overlooked. <i>Gymnosporia</i>, based in <i>Celastrus</i> sect. <i>Gymnosporia</i> Wight &amp; Arn. (Prodr. Fl. Ind. Orient. 1: 159. 1834), is conserved with a conserved type against <i>Catha</i> Forssk. ex Scop. (1777), <i>Scytophyllum</i> Eckl. &amp; Zeyh. (1834–1835), <i>Encentrus</i> C. Presl (1845), and <i>Polyacanthus</i> C. Presl (1845). <i>Gymnosporia</i> has an Old World distribution, including about 115 species.</p>\n<p>While there are no parallel binding decisions on generic names ending in -<i>sporia</i>/-<i>ius</i>/-<i>ium</i> vs. -<i>spora</i>/-<i>us</i>/-<i>um</i> as to whether or not they are sufficiently alike to be confused and treated as homonyms, there are some decisions on names ending in -<i>ia</i> versus -<i>a</i>. Examples include <i>Gaillona</i> Bonnem. (1828) [Algae] vs. <i>Gaillonia</i> DC. (1830) [Angiosp.: <i>Rubiaceae</i>] and <i>Gillena</i> Adans. (1763) [Angiosp.: <i>Clethraceae</i>] vs. <i>Gillenia</i> Moench (1802) [Angiosp.: <i>Rosaceae</i>], both not considered homonyms. On the other hand, <i>Andinia</i> (Luer) Luer (2000) [Angiosp.: <i>Orchidaceae</i>] vs. <i>Andina</i> J.A. Jiménez &amp; M.J. Cano (2012) [Mosses] and <i>Huberia</i> DC. (1828) [Angiosp.: <i>Melastomataceae</i>] vs. <i>Hubera</i> Chaowasku (2012) [Angiosp.: <i>Annonaceae</i>] are treated as homonyms. Because the ending -<i>spora</i> is not rare, and perhaps because accidentally this spelling was much more used for angiosperm generic names than -<i>sporia</i>, there are cases where <i>Gymnosporia</i> was mistakenly spelled as <i>Gymnospora</i>, in some cases even on the titles of scientific papers (see Monpara &amp; al. in Int. J. Bioinf. Intelligent Computing 2: 82–98. 2023; Kotade &amp; Hiremath in Asian J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 5: 78–84. 2019; Anil &amp; Talluri in Rasayan J. Chem. 14: 2318–2326. 2021; and Van Wyk &amp; Gericke, People's Plants: Useful Pl. S. Africa: 126. 1998). Given that the situation is not easily interpreted, a binding decision from Nomenclature Committees will certainly bring stability. If <i>Gymnospora</i> and <i>Gymnosporia</i> are treated as homonyms, a replacement name must be proposed for <i>Gymnospora</i> (Chodat) J.F.B. Pastore since this name is in use for Brazilian taxa (see https://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br).</p>","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taxon","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(111) Gymnosporia (Wight & Arn.) Benth. & Hook. f. (1862) [Angiosp.: Celastr.]

Gymnospora (Chodat) J.F.B. Pastore (2013) [Angiosp.: Polygal.]

Gymnospora (Chodat) J.F.B. Pastore (Polygalaceae), a small genus including two species, both endemic to Brazil, was elevated to generic status by Pastore (in Novon 22: 305. 2013). Previously this taxon had been recognized as a section of Polygala by Chodat (in Biblioth. Universelle Rev. Suisse 25: 698. 1891; in Mém. Soc. Phys. Genève 31(2), no. 2: 87. 1893) or as a subgenus by Paiva (in Fontqueria 50: 147. 1998). When Pastore (l.c.) decided to adopt Gymnospora as a generic name, the similarity with Gymnosporia (Wight & Arn.) Benth. & Hook. f. (Gen. Pl. 1: 359, 365. 1862), nom. cons. (Celastraceae) was certainly overlooked. Gymnosporia, based in Celastrus sect. Gymnosporia Wight & Arn. (Prodr. Fl. Ind. Orient. 1: 159. 1834), is conserved with a conserved type against Catha Forssk. ex Scop. (1777), Scytophyllum Eckl. & Zeyh. (1834–1835), Encentrus C. Presl (1845), and Polyacanthus C. Presl (1845). Gymnosporia has an Old World distribution, including about 115 species.

While there are no parallel binding decisions on generic names ending in -sporia/-ius/-ium vs. -spora/-us/-um as to whether or not they are sufficiently alike to be confused and treated as homonyms, there are some decisions on names ending in -ia versus -a. Examples include Gaillona Bonnem. (1828) [Algae] vs. Gaillonia DC. (1830) [Angiosp.: Rubiaceae] and Gillena Adans. (1763) [Angiosp.: Clethraceae] vs. Gillenia Moench (1802) [Angiosp.: Rosaceae], both not considered homonyms. On the other hand, Andinia (Luer) Luer (2000) [Angiosp.: Orchidaceae] vs. Andina J.A. Jiménez & M.J. Cano (2012) [Mosses] and Huberia DC. (1828) [Angiosp.: Melastomataceae] vs. Hubera Chaowasku (2012) [Angiosp.: Annonaceae] are treated as homonyms. Because the ending -spora is not rare, and perhaps because accidentally this spelling was much more used for angiosperm generic names than -sporia, there are cases where Gymnosporia was mistakenly spelled as Gymnospora, in some cases even on the titles of scientific papers (see Monpara & al. in Int. J. Bioinf. Intelligent Computing 2: 82–98. 2023; Kotade & Hiremath in Asian J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 5: 78–84. 2019; Anil & Talluri in Rasayan J. Chem. 14: 2318–2326. 2021; and Van Wyk & Gericke, People's Plants: Useful Pl. S. Africa: 126. 1998). Given that the situation is not easily interpreted, a binding decision from Nomenclature Committees will certainly bring stability. If Gymnospora and Gymnosporia are treated as homonyms, a replacement name must be proposed for Gymnospora (Chodat) J.F.B. Pastore since this name is in use for Brazilian taxa (see https://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(111) 请求就 Gymnosporia (Wight & Arn.) Benth. & Hook. f. (Celastraceae) 和 Gymnospora (Chodat) J.F.B. Pastore (Polygalaceae) 是否相似到足以混淆做出具有约束力的决定
(111) Gymnosporia (Wight & Arn.) Benth. & Hook. f.(1862) [Angiosp.F.B.Pastore(远志科),一个包括两个种的小属,均为巴西特有种,被 Pastore 提升为属种(见 Novon 22: 305.)在此之前,该分类群已被 Chodat(在 Biblioth.Universelle Rev. Suisse 25: 698.1891; in Mém.Soc. Phys. Genève 31(2), no.1893) or as a subgenus by Paiva (in Fontqueria 50: 147. 1998).当 Pastore(l.c.)决定采用 Gymnospora 作为属名时,与 Gymnosporia (Wight & Arn.) Benth. & Hook. f. (Gen. Pl. 1: 359, 365. 1862), nom.(Celastraceae)肯定被忽视了。Gymnosporia, based in Celastrus sect.Gymnosporia Wight & Arn. (Prodr. Fl. Ind. Orient. 1: 159. 1834), is conserved with a conserved type against Catha Forssk.(1834-1835), Encentrus C. Presl (1845), and Polyacanthus C. Presl (1845).虽然对于以-sporia/-ius/-ium 结尾的属名与以-spora/-us/-um 结尾的属名没有平行的有约束力的决定,以确定它们是否足够相似而被混淆并作为同名处理,但对于以-ia 结尾的属名与以-a 结尾的属名有一些决定。例如 Gaillona Bonnem.(1828) [Algae] vs. Gaillonia DC. (1830) [Angiosp.(1763) [Angiosp.: Clethraceae] vs. Gillenia Moench (1802) [Angiosp.: Rosaceae],两者都不被认为是同名。另一方面,Andinia (Luer) Luer (2000) [Angiosp.: Orchidaceae] vs. Andina J.A. Jiménez & M.J. Cano (2012) [Mosses] 和 Huberia DC. (1828) [Angiosp.: Melastomataceae] vs. Hubera Chaowasku (2012) [Angiosp.: Annonaceae] 被视为同物异名。由于词尾 -spora 并不罕见,而且也许是由于这种拼法比 -sporia 更常用于被子植物的属名,因此 Gymnosporia 被误拼为 Gymnospora 的情况时有发生,有时甚至出现在科学论文的标题上(见 Monpara & al. in Int.J. Bioinf.Intelligent Computing 2: 82-98.2023; Kotade & Hiremath in Asian J. Pharm.Pharmacol.5: 78-84.2019; Anil & Talluri in Rasayan J. Chem.14: 2318-2326.2021; and Van Wyk & Gericke, People's Plants:Useful Pl.S. Africa: 126.1998).鉴于这种情况不易解释,命名委员会做出具有约束力的决定肯定会带来稳定。如果 Gymnospora 和 Gymnosporia 被视为同名,则必须为 Gymnospora (Chodat) J.F.B. Pastore 提议一个替代名称,因为该名称已用于巴西类群(见 https://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Taxon
Taxon 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: TAXON is the bi-monthly journal of the International Association for Plant Taxonomy and is devoted to systematic and evolutionary biology with emphasis on plants and fungi. It is published bimonthly by the International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, c/o Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. Details of page charges are given in the Guidelines for authors. Papers will be reviewed by at least two specialists.
期刊最新文献
IAPT chromosome data 42 Morphological and molecular analyses consistently support the existence of two species under Hypochaeris achyrophorus (Asteraceae, Cichorieae) Biogeographic, climatic, morphological, cytological and molecular data reveal a new diploid species from China in the genus Xanthocyparis (Cupressaceae) Species delimitation in Xanthium sect. Acanthoxanthium (Heliantheae, Asteraceae) and the neglected species Xanthium argenteum (3050) Proposal to reject the name Cistus pilosus (Cistaceae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1