Storable votes with a “pay as you win” mechanism

IF 0.8 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1007/s11403-024-00407-1
Arturo Macías
{"title":"Storable votes with a “pay as you win” mechanism","authors":"Arturo Macías","doi":"10.1007/s11403-024-00407-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper introduces a new storable vote mechanism (Storable Votes-Pay as you win, SV-PAYW) where a fixed number of votes is cast among different alternatives, and the votes spent (and redistributed) on each election depend only on the number cast for the winning alternative. The mechanism is expected to deliver more enfranchisement, efficiency and a reduction of uncertainty and strategic behavior with respect to previously known voting systems. To compare the pure storable votes with the SV-PAYW implementations, two key characteristics are monitored: the “enfranchisement gap”, which measures the proportionality between political influence and electoral victories, and the “efficiency ratio”, which assesses the utility derived from the allocation of electoral victories on a scale from random allocation (zero) to the social optimum (one). SV-PAYW consistently outperforms pure storable votes in terms of enfranchisement in all cases. Additionally, as a general rule (there are some exceptions), the “efficiency ratio” tends to be higher for SV-PAYW, hovering around 0.7.</p>","PeriodicalId":45479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-024-00407-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces a new storable vote mechanism (Storable Votes-Pay as you win, SV-PAYW) where a fixed number of votes is cast among different alternatives, and the votes spent (and redistributed) on each election depend only on the number cast for the winning alternative. The mechanism is expected to deliver more enfranchisement, efficiency and a reduction of uncertainty and strategic behavior with respect to previously known voting systems. To compare the pure storable votes with the SV-PAYW implementations, two key characteristics are monitored: the “enfranchisement gap”, which measures the proportionality between political influence and electoral victories, and the “efficiency ratio”, which assesses the utility derived from the allocation of electoral victories on a scale from random allocation (zero) to the social optimum (one). SV-PAYW consistently outperforms pure storable votes in terms of enfranchisement in all cases. Additionally, as a general rule (there are some exceptions), the “efficiency ratio” tends to be higher for SV-PAYW, hovering around 0.7.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用 "边赢边付 "机制的可储存选票
本文介绍了一种新的可储存投票机制(Storable Votes-Pay as you win,SV-PAYW),即在不同的备选方案中投出固定数量的选票,每次选举所花费(和重新分配)的选票仅取决于投给获胜方案的选票数量。与之前已知的投票系统相比,该机制有望带来更多的选举权、更高的效率,并减少不确定性和策略行为。为了比较纯可储存选票与 SV-PAYW 实施方案,我们对两个关键特征进行了监测:"选举权差距"(衡量政治影响力与选举胜利之间的比例关系)和 "效率比"(评估从随机分配(0)到社会最优分配(1)的选举胜利分配所产生的效用)。在所有情况下,就选举权而言,SV-PAYW 始终优于纯粹的可储存选票。此外,作为一般规则(也有例外),SV-PAYW 的 "效率比 "往往更高,徘徊在 0.7 左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
18.20%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination addresses the vibrant and interdisciplinary field of agent-based approaches to economics and social sciences. It focuses on simulating and synthesizing emergent phenomena and collective behavior in order to understand economic and social systems. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, the following: markets as complex adaptive systems, multi-agents in economics, artificial markets with heterogeneous agents, financial markets with heterogeneous agents, theory and simulation of agent-based models, adaptive agents with artificial intelligence, interacting particle systems in economics, social and complex networks, econophysics, non-linear economic dynamics, evolutionary games, market mechanisms in distributed computing systems, experimental economics, collective decisions. Contributions are mostly from economics, physics, computer science and related fields and are typically based on sound theoretical models and supported by experimental validation. Survey papers are also welcome. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination is the official journal of the Association of Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents. Officially cited as: J Econ Interact Coord
期刊最新文献
Mesoscopic structure of the stock market and portfolio optimization Introduction to the special issue on two editions of the workshop on economic science with heterogeneous interacting agents, $$24.5{\text {th}}$$ Milan, 2021 (wehia 2021) $$25{\text {th}}$$ Catania, 2022 (wehia 2022) Project finance or corporate finance for renewable energy? an agent-based insight From zero-intelligence to Bayesian learning: the effect of rationality on market efficiency Nonlinear dynamics in a public good game
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1