Modeling the link between environmental, social, and governance disclosures and scores: the case of publicly traded companies in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index

IF 6.9 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Financial Innovation Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1186/s40854-024-00619-1
Mustafa Tevfik Kartal, Serpil Kılıç Depren, Ugur Korkut Pata, Dilvin Taşkın, Tuba Şavlı
{"title":"Modeling the link between environmental, social, and governance disclosures and scores: the case of publicly traded companies in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index","authors":"Mustafa Tevfik Kartal, Serpil Kılıç Depren, Ugur Korkut Pata, Dilvin Taşkın, Tuba Şavlı","doi":"10.1186/s40854-024-00619-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study constructs a proposed model to investigate the link between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures and ESG scores for publicly traded companies in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability (XUSRD) index. In this context, this study considers 66 companies, examining recently structured ESG disclosures for 2022 that were published for the first time as novel data and applying a multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network algorithm. The relevant results are fourfold. (1) The MLP algorithm has explanatory power (i.e., R2) of 79% in estimating companies’ ESG scores. (2) Common, environment, social, and governance pillars have respective weights of 21.04%, 44.87%, 30.34%, and 3.74% in total ESG scores. (3) The absolute and relative significance of each ESG reporting principle for companies’ ESG scores varies. (4) According to absolute and relative significance, the most effective ESG principle is the common principle, followed by social and environmental principles, whereas governance principles have less significance. Overall, the results demonstrate that applying a linear approach to complete deficient ESG disclosures is inefficient for increasing companies’ ESG scores; instead, companies should focus on the ESG principles that have the highest relative significance. The findings of this study contribute to the literature by defining the most significant ESG principles for stimulating the ESG scores of companies in the XUSRD index.","PeriodicalId":37175,"journal":{"name":"Financial Innovation","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00619-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study constructs a proposed model to investigate the link between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures and ESG scores for publicly traded companies in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability (XUSRD) index. In this context, this study considers 66 companies, examining recently structured ESG disclosures for 2022 that were published for the first time as novel data and applying a multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network algorithm. The relevant results are fourfold. (1) The MLP algorithm has explanatory power (i.e., R2) of 79% in estimating companies’ ESG scores. (2) Common, environment, social, and governance pillars have respective weights of 21.04%, 44.87%, 30.34%, and 3.74% in total ESG scores. (3) The absolute and relative significance of each ESG reporting principle for companies’ ESG scores varies. (4) According to absolute and relative significance, the most effective ESG principle is the common principle, followed by social and environmental principles, whereas governance principles have less significance. Overall, the results demonstrate that applying a linear approach to complete deficient ESG disclosures is inefficient for increasing companies’ ESG scores; instead, companies should focus on the ESG principles that have the highest relative significance. The findings of this study contribute to the literature by defining the most significant ESG principles for stimulating the ESG scores of companies in the XUSRD index.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟环境、社会和治理信息披露与得分之间的联系:伊斯坦布尔证券交易所可持续发展指数中的上市公司案例
本研究构建了一个拟议模型,以研究伊斯坦布尔证券交易所可持续发展指数(XUSRD)中上市公司的环境、社会和治理(ESG)披露与 ESG 分数之间的联系。在此背景下,本研究考虑了 66 家公司,对首次发布的 2022 家公司最近结构化的 ESG 披露作为新数据进行了检查,并应用了多层感知器 (MLP) 人工神经网络算法。相关结果有四个方面。(1)MLP 算法在估算公司 ESG 分数方面的解释力(即 R2)为 79%。(2)共同、环境、社会和治理支柱在 ESG 总分中的权重分别为 21.04%、44.87%、30.34% 和 3.74%。(3) 各ESG报告原则对公司ESG得分的绝对和相对重要性各不相同。(4) 从绝对和相对重要性来看,最有效的 ESG 原则是共同原则,其次是社会和环境原则,而治理原则的重要性较低。总之,研究结果表明,采用线性方法来完成ESG披露的不足之处,对于提高公司的ESG得分效率不高;相反,公司应关注相对重要性最高的ESG原则。本研究的结果界定了对刺激 XUSRD 指数中公司的 ESG 分数最重要的 ESG 原则,从而为相关文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Innovation
Financial Innovation Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Financial Innovation (FIN), a Springer OA journal sponsored by Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, serves as a global academic platform for sharing research findings in all aspects of financial innovation during the electronic business era. It facilitates interactions among researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, focusing on new financial instruments, technologies, markets, and institutions. Emphasizing emerging financial products enabled by disruptive technologies, FIN publishes high-quality academic and practical papers. The journal is peer-reviewed, indexed in SSCI, Scopus, Google Scholar, CNKI, CQVIP, and more.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning in business and finance: a literature review and research opportunities Predictive crypto-asset automated market maker architecture for decentralized finance using deep reinforcement learning Cryptocurrencies under climate shocks: a dynamic network analysis of extreme risk spillovers Exploring the coherency and predictability between the stocks of artificial intelligence and energy corporations From CFOs to crypto: exploratory study unraveling factors in corporate adoption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1