Man and the Machine: Effects of AI-assisted Human Labeling on Interactive Annotation of Real-Time Video Streams

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1145/3649457
Marko Radeta, Ruben Freitas, Claudio Rodrigues, Agustin Zuniga, Ngoc Thi Nguyen, Huber Flores, Petteri Nurmi
{"title":"Man and the Machine: Effects of AI-assisted Human Labeling on Interactive Annotation of Real-Time Video Streams","authors":"Marko Radeta, Ruben Freitas, Claudio Rodrigues, Agustin Zuniga, Ngoc Thi Nguyen, Huber Flores, Petteri Nurmi","doi":"10.1145/3649457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>AI-assisted interactive annotation is a powerful way to facilitate data annotation – a prerequisite for constructing robust AI models. While AI-assisted interactive annotation has been extensively studied in static settings, less is known about its usage in dynamic scenarios where the annotators operate under time and cognitive constraints, e.g., while detecting suspicious or dangerous activities from real-time surveillance feeds. Understanding how AI can assist annotators in these tasks and facilitate consistent annotation is paramount to ensure high performance for AI models trained on these data. We address this gap in interactive machine learning (IML) research, contributing an extensive investigation of the benefits, limitations, and challenges of AI-assisted annotation in dynamic application use cases. We address both the effects of AI on annotators and the effects of (AI) annotations on the performance of AI models trained on annotated data in real-time video annotations. We conduct extensive experiments that compare annotation performance at two annotator levels (expert and non-expert) and two interactive labelling techniques (with and without AI-assistance). In a controlled study with <i>N</i> = 34 annotators and a follow up study with 51963 images and their annotation labels being input to the AI model, we demonstrate that the benefits of AI-assisted models are greatest for non-expert users and for cases where targets are only partially or briefly visible. The expert users tend to outperform or achieve similar performance as AI model. Labels combining AI and expert annotations result in the best overall performance as the AI reduces overflow and latency in the expert annotations. We derive guidelines for the use of AI-assisted human annotation in real-time dynamic use cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3649457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI-assisted interactive annotation is a powerful way to facilitate data annotation – a prerequisite for constructing robust AI models. While AI-assisted interactive annotation has been extensively studied in static settings, less is known about its usage in dynamic scenarios where the annotators operate under time and cognitive constraints, e.g., while detecting suspicious or dangerous activities from real-time surveillance feeds. Understanding how AI can assist annotators in these tasks and facilitate consistent annotation is paramount to ensure high performance for AI models trained on these data. We address this gap in interactive machine learning (IML) research, contributing an extensive investigation of the benefits, limitations, and challenges of AI-assisted annotation in dynamic application use cases. We address both the effects of AI on annotators and the effects of (AI) annotations on the performance of AI models trained on annotated data in real-time video annotations. We conduct extensive experiments that compare annotation performance at two annotator levels (expert and non-expert) and two interactive labelling techniques (with and without AI-assistance). In a controlled study with N = 34 annotators and a follow up study with 51963 images and their annotation labels being input to the AI model, we demonstrate that the benefits of AI-assisted models are greatest for non-expert users and for cases where targets are only partially or briefly visible. The expert users tend to outperform or achieve similar performance as AI model. Labels combining AI and expert annotations result in the best overall performance as the AI reduces overflow and latency in the expert annotations. We derive guidelines for the use of AI-assisted human annotation in real-time dynamic use cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人与机器:人工智能辅助人工标注对实时视频流互动注释的影响
人工智能辅助交互式注释是一种促进数据注释的强大方法,也是构建强大人工智能模型的先决条件。虽然人工智能辅助交互式注释已在静态环境中得到广泛研究,但对其在动态场景中的应用却知之甚少,在动态场景中,注释者的操作受到时间和认知能力的限制,例如从实时监控馈送中检测可疑或危险活动。要确保在这些数据上训练的人工智能模型的高性能,了解人工智能如何协助注释者完成这些任务并促进注释的一致性至关重要。我们针对交互式机器学习(IML)研究中的这一空白,对动态应用案例中人工智能辅助标注的优势、局限性和挑战进行了广泛的调查。我们既探讨了人工智能对注释者的影响,也探讨了(人工智能)注释对在实时视频注释中根据注释数据训练的人工智能模型性能的影响。我们进行了广泛的实验,比较了两种注释者水平(专家和非专家)和两种交互式标签技术(有人工智能辅助和无人工智能辅助)下的注释性能。在一项由 N = 34 名标注者进行的对照研究和一项由 51963 张图像及其标注标签输入人工智能模型的后续研究中,我们证明了人工智能辅助模型对非专家用户以及目标仅部分可见或短暂可见的情况的优势最大。专家用户的表现往往优于人工智能模型或与之相近。由于人工智能减少了专家注释的溢出和延迟,因此结合人工智能和专家注释的标签可获得最佳的整体性能。我们得出了在实时动态用例中使用人工智能辅助人类注释的指导原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1