Pediatric thoracic outlet syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Print Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.2.PEDS23511
Anthony Price, Nathan Fredricks, Nina Truong, Robert Y North
{"title":"Pediatric thoracic outlet syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Anthony Price, Nathan Fredricks, Nina Truong, Robert Y North","doi":"10.3171/2024.2.PEDS23511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex disorder affecting the neurovascular structures of the upper extremity as they traverse from the neck and thorax to the upper extremity. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on pediatric TOS, offering insights into its clinical presentation, etiology, treatment modalities, and outcomes in contrast to those reported in adult TOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search for pediatric TOS in the PubMed database using PRISMA guidelines identified 6 relevant studies published between 2008 and 2022. In total, 227 pediatric TOS cases in 216 patients were analyzed. Data categories explored for TOS in pediatric patients included study design, number of patients included, mean age and sex of patients, TOS type, laterality, bony abnormalities, time to surgery, symptoms, treatment modalities, initial surgical technique, surgical complications, percent lost to follow-up, mean follow-up period, and treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from the 6 studies of 216 patients show a distinct pattern in pediatric TOS, with a 1.84:1 female-to-male ratio, a mean age of 15.49 years, and a lower prevalence of neurogenic TOS (75%, 95% CI 0.41-0.93; I2 = 86%, p < 0.01) compared with the prevailing literature on adults (87.5%-99%). Venous and arterial TOS accounted for a higher proportion of cases in pediatric patients than in adults, challenging the traditional adult-oriented perspective. Right-sided presentations were more common, reflecting right-arm dominance in most individuals. Additionally, bony abnormalities were more common in adults (30%) than in children (10.65%). Treatments involved mixed methods, predominantly using combinations of muscle resection (95.26%), neurolysis (78.02%), and bone resection (72.41%). Patients had high rates of symptom improvement (89%, 95% CI 0.67-0.97; I2 = 85%, p < 0.01) following surgery, with improvement of symptoms ranging from slight to complete relief. Complications were infrequent (5.66%), and most patients reported positive outcomes. The limitations of this analysis include subjective diagnostic and reporting criteria for TOS given its broad range of presentations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis brings to light the distinctive characteristics of pediatric TOS and underscores the importance of recognizing these differences to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment in this patient population. Further research is needed to understand the predictive value of conservative treatments, especially in pediatric TOS cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.2.PEDS23511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex disorder affecting the neurovascular structures of the upper extremity as they traverse from the neck and thorax to the upper extremity. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on pediatric TOS, offering insights into its clinical presentation, etiology, treatment modalities, and outcomes in contrast to those reported in adult TOS.

Methods: A comprehensive search for pediatric TOS in the PubMed database using PRISMA guidelines identified 6 relevant studies published between 2008 and 2022. In total, 227 pediatric TOS cases in 216 patients were analyzed. Data categories explored for TOS in pediatric patients included study design, number of patients included, mean age and sex of patients, TOS type, laterality, bony abnormalities, time to surgery, symptoms, treatment modalities, initial surgical technique, surgical complications, percent lost to follow-up, mean follow-up period, and treatment outcome.

Results: The results from the 6 studies of 216 patients show a distinct pattern in pediatric TOS, with a 1.84:1 female-to-male ratio, a mean age of 15.49 years, and a lower prevalence of neurogenic TOS (75%, 95% CI 0.41-0.93; I2 = 86%, p < 0.01) compared with the prevailing literature on adults (87.5%-99%). Venous and arterial TOS accounted for a higher proportion of cases in pediatric patients than in adults, challenging the traditional adult-oriented perspective. Right-sided presentations were more common, reflecting right-arm dominance in most individuals. Additionally, bony abnormalities were more common in adults (30%) than in children (10.65%). Treatments involved mixed methods, predominantly using combinations of muscle resection (95.26%), neurolysis (78.02%), and bone resection (72.41%). Patients had high rates of symptom improvement (89%, 95% CI 0.67-0.97; I2 = 85%, p < 0.01) following surgery, with improvement of symptoms ranging from slight to complete relief. Complications were infrequent (5.66%), and most patients reported positive outcomes. The limitations of this analysis include subjective diagnostic and reporting criteria for TOS given its broad range of presentations.

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis brings to light the distinctive characteristics of pediatric TOS and underscores the importance of recognizing these differences to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment in this patient population. Further research is needed to understand the predictive value of conservative treatments, especially in pediatric TOS cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿胸廓出口综合征:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:胸廓出口综合征(TOS胸廓出口综合征(TOS)是一种影响上肢神经血管结构的复杂疾病,因为这些结构从颈部和胸部一直延伸到上肢。本系统综述和荟萃分析主要针对小儿 TOS,深入探讨其临床表现、病因、治疗方法和结果,与成人 TOS 的报道形成鲜明对比:采用PRISMA指南在PubMed数据库中对小儿TOS进行了全面搜索,发现了2008年至2022年间发表的6篇相关研究。共分析了216名患者的227例小儿TOS病例。探讨的儿科TOS数据类别包括研究设计、纳入患者人数、患者平均年龄和性别、TOS类型、侧位、骨骼异常、手术时间、症状、治疗方式、初始手术技术、手术并发症、随访损失百分比、平均随访时间和治疗结果:6项研究共对216名患者进行了调查,结果显示小儿TOS的发病模式非常明显,男女比例为1.84:1,平均年龄为15.49岁,神经源性TOS的发病率(75%,95% CI 0.41-0.93;I2 = 86%,p < 0.01)低于成人文献(87.5%-99%)。与成人相比,静脉和动脉TOS在儿童患者中所占比例更高,这对传统的以成人为导向的观点提出了挑战。右侧表现更为常见,这反映了大多数人的右臂优势。此外,骨骼异常在成人(30%)中比在儿童(10.65%)中更常见。治疗方法多种多样,主要采用肌肉切除术(95.26%)、神经溶解术(78.02%)和骨切除术(72.41%)。患者术后症状改善率高(89%,95% CI 0.67-0.97;I2 = 85%,P < 0.01),症状改善程度从轻微到完全缓解不等。并发症并不常见(5.66%),大多数患者都报告了积极的结果。这项分析的局限性包括,鉴于TOS的表现范围广泛,其诊断和报告标准具有主观性:本系统综述和荟萃分析揭示了小儿 TOS 的显著特征,并强调了认识到这些差异以确保准确诊断和有效治疗这一患者群体的重要性。要了解保守治疗的预测价值,尤其是对小儿 TOS 病例的预测价值,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
期刊最新文献
Pediatric CSF diversion procedures for treatment of hydrocephalus during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of spheno-occipital synchondrosis exposure via extended endoscopic endonasal surgery on midface growth in pediatric patients. Association between social determinants of health and select neurosurgical procedures in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. Letter to the Editor. Sleep apnea and Chiari malformation type I. Predictors of postsurgical retethering in pediatric fatty or tight filum terminale: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1167 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1