Brand warmth elicits feedback, not complaints

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s11747-024-01009-w
{"title":"Brand warmth elicits feedback, not complaints","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11747-024-01009-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Consumers perceive brands on their intended goals that can benefit or harm consumers. These warmth perceptions become consequential when a consumer experiences a product-harm incident. Conventional wisdom suggests that brand warmth may inhibit consumers from reporting such incidents to the brand and/or regulators. However, the authors’ analyses of field data show that brand warmth increases the number of reports of harm incidents. Yet consumers’ underlying motive is to provide feedback rather than complain. Indeed, using machine learning and regressions, and laboratory experiments, the authors demonstrate that brand warmth boosts the proportion of feedback (vs. complaint) reports. Next, they theorize and show that brand warmth induces consumer benevolence, which drives the consumer toward feedback (vs. complaint). Lastly, the authors demonstrate that if managers of a warm brand acknowledge the consumer’s feedback motive in their recovery messages, such acknowledgement enhances consumer satisfaction. The research extends the discipline’s knowledge on how a brand’s warmth perceptions impact consumers’ responses in the aftermath of a product-harm incident and what intervention managers can use in such a context.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01009-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumers perceive brands on their intended goals that can benefit or harm consumers. These warmth perceptions become consequential when a consumer experiences a product-harm incident. Conventional wisdom suggests that brand warmth may inhibit consumers from reporting such incidents to the brand and/or regulators. However, the authors’ analyses of field data show that brand warmth increases the number of reports of harm incidents. Yet consumers’ underlying motive is to provide feedback rather than complain. Indeed, using machine learning and regressions, and laboratory experiments, the authors demonstrate that brand warmth boosts the proportion of feedback (vs. complaint) reports. Next, they theorize and show that brand warmth induces consumer benevolence, which drives the consumer toward feedback (vs. complaint). Lastly, the authors demonstrate that if managers of a warm brand acknowledge the consumer’s feedback motive in their recovery messages, such acknowledgement enhances consumer satisfaction. The research extends the discipline’s knowledge on how a brand’s warmth perceptions impact consumers’ responses in the aftermath of a product-harm incident and what intervention managers can use in such a context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
品牌温情引发反馈,而非抱怨
摘要 消费者会根据品牌的预期目标来感知品牌,这些目标可能会使消费者受益,也可能会对消费者造成伤害。当消费者遭遇产品伤害事件时,这些对品牌温暖度的感知就会产生影响。传统观念认为,品牌温暖度可能会抑制消费者向品牌和/或监管机构报告此类事件。然而,作者对现场数据的分析表明,品牌温暖度会增加危害事件的报告数量。然而,消费者的根本动机是提供反馈而非投诉。事实上,作者利用机器学习、回归和实验室实验证明,品牌温暖度会提高反馈(与投诉)报告的比例。接下来,他们从理论上证明了品牌温暖会诱发消费者的善意,从而促使消费者做出反馈(相对于投诉)。最后,作者证明,如果一个温暖品牌的管理者在其恢复信息中承认消费者的反馈动机,这种承认会提高消费者的满意度。这项研究拓展了该学科的知识面,即品牌的温暖感如何影响消费者在产品伤害事件发生后的反应,以及管理者在这种情况下可以采取哪些干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
期刊最新文献
There is business like show business! What marketing scholars and managers can learn from 40 years of entertainment science research Expressions of customer rumination in online posts and firm responses The paradox of product scarcity: Catalyzing the speed of innovation diffusion Recycle right: How to decrease recycling contamination with informational point-of-disposal signage The Taguchi approach to large-scale experimental designs: A powerful and efficient tool for advancing marketing theory and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1