Do some prefer to pay? Identifying bias against free COVID-19 tests

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100483
Yeonsoo Baik , Cedric H. Bien-Gund , Gregory P. Bisson , Robert Gross , Jessica Fishman
{"title":"Do some prefer to pay? Identifying bias against free COVID-19 tests","authors":"Yeonsoo Baik ,&nbsp;Cedric H. Bien-Gund ,&nbsp;Gregory P. Bisson ,&nbsp;Robert Gross ,&nbsp;Jessica Fishman","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In the United States, a federal emergency program has made SARS-CoV-2 self-test kits available at no cost. It is unclear how widely free tests are preferred. We conducted a survey to estimate the proportion of respondents who do not prefer a free test. We hypothesized that free tests would not be preferred universally, and that a preference for paying would be more common among those with conservative politics than with liberal politics, regardless of income.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Observational study design.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A national sample of US adults completed an online survey. To reduce potential enrollment bias, the survey’s focus was not specified beforehand. To prioritize a high-risk group, participation was limited to those who were unvaccinated or were incompletely vaccinated in the primary series against COVID-19. Participants reported their testing preferences and socio-demographic characteristics, including political affiliation. The main outcome assessed if a participant preferred to pay for a self-test or receive a free one (subsidized by the US government).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1215 participants, (73%, n = 886) preferred free self-testing, while 27% (n = 329) preferred to pay for the same testing. After adjusting for income, the odds of preferring to pay for self-testing were 66% higher in “strong” Republicans compared to “strong” Democrats (odds ratio = 1.66, 95% confidence interval = 1.07–2.62).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>More than a quarter of individuals preferred paying for these tests. This preference was more likely among those with right-wing politics. Policy implications are discussed, along with future research directions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266653522400020X/pdfft?md5=7ac9909a7bc5e599c6f2412ace47c16e&pid=1-s2.0-S266653522400020X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266653522400020X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

In the United States, a federal emergency program has made SARS-CoV-2 self-test kits available at no cost. It is unclear how widely free tests are preferred. We conducted a survey to estimate the proportion of respondents who do not prefer a free test. We hypothesized that free tests would not be preferred universally, and that a preference for paying would be more common among those with conservative politics than with liberal politics, regardless of income.

Design

Observational study design.

Methods

A national sample of US adults completed an online survey. To reduce potential enrollment bias, the survey’s focus was not specified beforehand. To prioritize a high-risk group, participation was limited to those who were unvaccinated or were incompletely vaccinated in the primary series against COVID-19. Participants reported their testing preferences and socio-demographic characteristics, including political affiliation. The main outcome assessed if a participant preferred to pay for a self-test or receive a free one (subsidized by the US government).

Results

Among 1215 participants, (73%, n = 886) preferred free self-testing, while 27% (n = 329) preferred to pay for the same testing. After adjusting for income, the odds of preferring to pay for self-testing were 66% higher in “strong” Republicans compared to “strong” Democrats (odds ratio = 1.66, 95% confidence interval = 1.07–2.62).

Conclusions

More than a quarter of individuals preferred paying for these tests. This preference was more likely among those with right-wing politics. Policy implications are discussed, along with future research directions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有些人喜欢付费吗?识别对免费 COVID-19 检测的偏见
目标在美国,一项联邦紧急计划免费提供 SARS-CoV-2 自我检测试剂盒。目前尚不清楚免费检测在多大范围内受到青睐。我们进行了一项调查,以估计不喜欢免费检测的受访者比例。我们假设,并非所有人都喜欢免费检测,而且无论收入如何,保守派比自由派更倾向于付费检测。为了减少潜在的登记偏差,调查的重点事先没有明确规定。为优先考虑高风险人群,调查对象仅限于未接种或未完全接种 COVID-19 疫苗的人群。参与者报告了他们的检测偏好和社会人口特征,包括政治派别。主要结果是评估参与者是愿意付费进行自我检测还是接受免费检测(由美国政府补贴)。结果在 1215 名参与者中,73%(n = 886)的人愿意接受免费自我检测,27%(n = 329)的人愿意付费进行同样的检测。在对收入进行调整后,与 "坚定的 "民主党人相比,"坚定的 "共和党人倾向于付费进行自我检测的几率要高出 66%(几率比 = 1.66,95% 置信区间 = 1.07-2.62)。超过四分之一的人倾向于付费进行这些测试,而右翼政治倾向者更倾向于付费。本文讨论了政策影响以及未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dispensing of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in Ireland: A population based study Association between child marriage and high blood glucose level in women: A birth cohort analysis Reaching national Covid-19 vaccination targets whilst decreasing inequalities in vaccine uptake: Public health teams' challenges in supporting disadvantaged populations Syndemic geographic patterns of cancer risk in a health-deprived area of England Young, deprived women are more at risk of testing positive for Chlamydia trachomatis: Results from a cross-sectional multicentre study in French health examination centres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1