IS THE PHOTOBIOMODULATION THERAPY EFFECTIVE IN CONTROLLING POST-SURGICAL SIDE EFFECTS AFTER THE EXTRACTION OF MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLARS? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.101983
GISELA CRISTINA VIANNA CAMOLESI , FÁBIO FRANÇA VIEIRA E SILVA , PATRICIA VERÓNICA AULESTIA-VIERA , XABIER MARICHALAR-MENDÍA , PILAR GÁNDARA-VILA , MARIO PÉREZ-SAYÁNS
{"title":"IS THE PHOTOBIOMODULATION THERAPY EFFECTIVE IN CONTROLLING POST-SURGICAL SIDE EFFECTS AFTER THE EXTRACTION OF MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLARS? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS","authors":"GISELA CRISTINA VIANNA CAMOLESI ,&nbsp;FÁBIO FRANÇA VIEIRA E SILVA ,&nbsp;PATRICIA VERÓNICA AULESTIA-VIERA ,&nbsp;XABIER MARICHALAR-MENDÍA ,&nbsp;PILAR GÁNDARA-VILA ,&nbsp;MARIO PÉREZ-SAYÁNS","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.101983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The extraction of third molars is one of the most performed surgical procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Pain, oedema, and trismus are the most frequently complications related in the surgical postoperative period. The literature has indicated PBM as a potential adjuvant method to reduce these complications. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is evaluate the PBM, as an optimal method to improve patient experience and minimize postoperative morbidity. Additionally, we seek to determine which wavelength, site, and frequency of application are most effective.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023429966) and followed PRISMA guidelines. The search was carried out in the main databases, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Lilacs, including reviews in the most important journals in the area of oral surgery and laser applied to oral surgery. In addition, all article references and also gray literature were reviewed. After the studies selection, the relevant data was collected. All the studies were randomized controlled trials and the patients were allocated into two groups: active PBM and inactive PBM. The statistical analysis was carried out using Stata v.16, and the methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed by the Jadad scale and RoB 2.0, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Where included 22 studies and 989 subjects, to all with a minimum follow-up of 7 days. Pain and oedema showed statistically significant results in favor to the active PBM group. Especially when laser applied in infrared mode, for pain and oedema at 48 h, MD = -1.80 (CI95% -2.88, -0.72) I² = 92.13% and MD = -1.45 (CI95% -2.42, -0.48) I² = 65.01%, respectively. The same is not true for trismus at 48 h, MD = 0.07 (CI95% -0.06, 0.21) I² = 3.26%. The meta-analysis also presented results in respect of laser site of application and number of PBM sessions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PBM with infrared laser, in a combination intraoral and extraoral application, in one session in the immediate postoperative period, has been shown to be effective to achieve the objectives of reducing pain and oedema after third molar extraction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338224000241/pdfft?md5=fc6718c5c1c90736aac033c486badd1b&pid=1-s2.0-S1532338224000241-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338224000241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The extraction of third molars is one of the most performed surgical procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Pain, oedema, and trismus are the most frequently complications related in the surgical postoperative period. The literature has indicated PBM as a potential adjuvant method to reduce these complications. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is evaluate the PBM, as an optimal method to improve patient experience and minimize postoperative morbidity. Additionally, we seek to determine which wavelength, site, and frequency of application are most effective.

Methods

This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023429966) and followed PRISMA guidelines. The search was carried out in the main databases, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Lilacs, including reviews in the most important journals in the area of oral surgery and laser applied to oral surgery. In addition, all article references and also gray literature were reviewed. After the studies selection, the relevant data was collected. All the studies were randomized controlled trials and the patients were allocated into two groups: active PBM and inactive PBM. The statistical analysis was carried out using Stata v.16, and the methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed by the Jadad scale and RoB 2.0, respectively.

Results

Where included 22 studies and 989 subjects, to all with a minimum follow-up of 7 days. Pain and oedema showed statistically significant results in favor to the active PBM group. Especially when laser applied in infrared mode, for pain and oedema at 48 h, MD = -1.80 (CI95% -2.88, -0.72) I² = 92.13% and MD = -1.45 (CI95% -2.42, -0.48) I² = 65.01%, respectively. The same is not true for trismus at 48 h, MD = 0.07 (CI95% -0.06, 0.21) I² = 3.26%. The meta-analysis also presented results in respect of laser site of application and number of PBM sessions.

Conclusions

PBM with infrared laser, in a combination intraoral and extraoral application, in one session in the immediate postoperative period, has been shown to be effective to achieve the objectives of reducing pain and oedema after third molar extraction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光生物调节疗法能否有效控制下颌第三磨牙拔除术后的副作用?系统回顾和荟萃分析
拔除第三磨牙是口腔颌面外科手术中最常见的手术之一。疼痛、水肿和咀嚼障碍是术后最常见的并发症。文献表明,PBM 是减少这些并发症的潜在辅助方法。本综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估 PBM,将其作为改善患者体验和最大限度降低术后发病率的最佳方法。此外,我们还试图确定哪种波长、部位和使用频率最有效。本综述已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023429966)上注册,并遵循了 PRISMA 指南。在主要数据库、PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、Embase、Scopus 和 Lilacs 中进行了搜索,包括口腔外科和激光应用于口腔外科领域最重要期刊中的综述。此外,还查阅了所有文章的参考文献和灰色文献。选定研究后,收集了相关数据。所有研究都是随机对照试验,患者被分为两组:积极的 PBM 和非积极的 PBM。统计分析采用 Stata v.16 进行,方法学质量和偏倚风险分别采用 Jadad 量表和 RoB 2.0 进行评估。其中包括 22 项研究和 989 名受试者,所有研究的随访时间均不少于 7 天。从统计学角度看,疼痛和水肿的治疗效果明显优于积极的 PBM 组。特别是在红外模式下使用激光时,48 小时后疼痛和水肿的 MD = -1.80 (CI95% -2.88, -0.72) I² = 92.13% 和 MD = -1.45 (CI95% -2.42, -0.48) I² = 65.01%。48 小时后的三联症情况则不同,MD = 0.07 (CI95% -0.06, 0.21) I² = 3.26%。荟萃分析还显示了激光应用部位和 PBM 治疗次数方面的结果。事实证明,在第三磨牙拔除术后,使用红外线激光进行口内和口外联合治疗,并在术后立即进行一次治疗,可有效达到减轻疼痛和水肿的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board CLINICAL EFFICACY OF PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY IN MANAGEMENT OF ORAL POTENTIALLY MALIGNANT DISORDERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS LIMITED EVIDENCE SUGGESTS IMPLANT PLACEMENT IS A VIABLE OPTION IN IRRADIATED HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS THE PRESENCE OF FLUIDS IN THE PARANASAL SINUSES MIGHT COMPLEMENT OTHER POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSTIC METHODS TO CONFIRM OR REFUTE DROWNING AS THE CAUSE OF DEATH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1