Essential hereditary undecidability

IF 0.3 4区 数学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Archive for Mathematical Logic Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s00153-024-00911-y
Albert Visser
{"title":"Essential hereditary undecidability","authors":"Albert Visser","doi":"10.1007/s00153-024-00911-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we study <i>essential hereditary undecidability</i>. Theories with this property are a convenient tool to prove undecidability of other theories. The paper develops the basic facts concerning essentially hereditary undecidability and provides salient examples, like a construction of essentially hereditarily undecidable theories due to Hanf and an example of a rather natural essentially hereditarily undecidable theory strictly below <span>R</span>. We discuss the (non-)interaction of essential hereditary undecidability with recursive boolean isomorphism. We develop a reduction relation <i>essential tolerance</i>, or, in the converse direction, <i>lax interpretability</i> that interacts in a good way with essential hereditary undecidability. We introduce the class of <span>\\(\\Sigma ^0_1\\)</span>-friendly theories and show that <span>\\(\\Sigma ^0_1\\)</span>-friendliness is sufficient but not necessary for essential hereditary undecidability. Finally, we adapt an argument due to Pakhomov, Murwanashyaka and Visser to show that there is no interpretability minimal essentially hereditarily undecidable theory.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48853,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":"63 5-6","pages":"529 - 562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00153-024-00911-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-024-00911-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we study essential hereditary undecidability. Theories with this property are a convenient tool to prove undecidability of other theories. The paper develops the basic facts concerning essentially hereditary undecidability and provides salient examples, like a construction of essentially hereditarily undecidable theories due to Hanf and an example of a rather natural essentially hereditarily undecidable theory strictly below R. We discuss the (non-)interaction of essential hereditary undecidability with recursive boolean isomorphism. We develop a reduction relation essential tolerance, or, in the converse direction, lax interpretability that interacts in a good way with essential hereditary undecidability. We introduce the class of \(\Sigma ^0_1\)-friendly theories and show that \(\Sigma ^0_1\)-friendliness is sufficient but not necessary for essential hereditary undecidability. Finally, we adapt an argument due to Pakhomov, Murwanashyaka and Visser to show that there is no interpretability minimal essentially hereditarily undecidable theory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基本遗传不可判定性
本文研究本质遗传不可判定性。具有这种性质的理论是证明其他理论不可判定性的方便工具。本文发展了有关本质遗传不可判定性的基本事实,并提供了一些突出的例子,如汉夫提出的本质遗传不可判定理论的构造,以及一个严格低于 R 的相当自然的本质遗传不可判定理论的例子。我们发展了一种还原关系本质公差,或者反过来说,与本质遗传不可判定性有良好互动关系的宽松可解释性。我们引入了一类(\(\Sigma ^0_1\)友好的理论,并证明了(\(\Sigma ^0_1\)友好性对于本质遗传不可判定性来说是充分的,而不是必要的。最后,我们改编了帕克霍莫夫、穆尔瓦纳什亚卡和维瑟的一个论证,以证明不存在可解释性最小的本质遗传不可判定理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archive for Mathematical Logic
Archive for Mathematical Logic MATHEMATICS-LOGIC
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.
期刊最新文献
Degrees of relations on canonically ordered natural numbers and integers A characterization of strongly computable finite factorization domains On categoricity of scattered linear orders of constructive ranks Different covering numbers of compact tree ideals The provably total functions of basic arithmetic and its extensions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1