Landfill tax and recycling

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Fiscal Studies Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1111/1475-5890.12360
Jordi Jofre‐Monseny, Pilar Sorribas‐Navarro
{"title":"Landfill tax and recycling","authors":"Jordi Jofre‐Monseny, Pilar Sorribas‐Navarro","doi":"10.1111/1475-5890.12360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides new empirical evidence on the role of landfill taxes in reducing landfill waste and promoting recycling. We focus on the impacts of the 2017 landfill tax law reform in Catalonia, a Spanish region, which increased the tax rate from 18 to 47 euros per tonne over the period 2017–20. Using municipality‐level data for Catalonia from the 2013–20 period, we contrast municipalities that differed in the use of door‐to‐door waste collection by the beginning of our study period. As door‐to‐door waste collection is advocated as especially efficient at reducing landfill waste, we hypothesise that municipalities that had not yet adopted this system had greater leeway in responding to the tax changes. Based on a two‐way fixed effects design, our findings reveal large differential responses to the tax hike. Compared with municipalities that had implemented door‐to‐door waste collection by 2013, we estimate that those that had not done this responded to the tax hike by reducing landfill waste by an additional 12 per cent, reducing total waste by 4 per cent, and increasing the share of recycled waste and waste that is sorted as organic by 6 and 2.5 percentage points, respectively. We provide suggestive evidence that the adoption of door‐to‐door waste collection is the main mechanism driving these responses.","PeriodicalId":51602,"journal":{"name":"Fiscal Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiscal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides new empirical evidence on the role of landfill taxes in reducing landfill waste and promoting recycling. We focus on the impacts of the 2017 landfill tax law reform in Catalonia, a Spanish region, which increased the tax rate from 18 to 47 euros per tonne over the period 2017–20. Using municipality‐level data for Catalonia from the 2013–20 period, we contrast municipalities that differed in the use of door‐to‐door waste collection by the beginning of our study period. As door‐to‐door waste collection is advocated as especially efficient at reducing landfill waste, we hypothesise that municipalities that had not yet adopted this system had greater leeway in responding to the tax changes. Based on a two‐way fixed effects design, our findings reveal large differential responses to the tax hike. Compared with municipalities that had implemented door‐to‐door waste collection by 2013, we estimate that those that had not done this responded to the tax hike by reducing landfill waste by an additional 12 per cent, reducing total waste by 4 per cent, and increasing the share of recycled waste and waste that is sorted as organic by 6 and 2.5 percentage points, respectively. We provide suggestive evidence that the adoption of door‐to‐door waste collection is the main mechanism driving these responses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
垃圾填埋税和回收利用
本文就垃圾填埋税在减少垃圾填埋量和促进回收利用方面的作用提供了新的经验证据。我们重点研究了西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区 2017 年垃圾填埋税法改革的影响,该改革在 2017-20 年期间将税率从每吨 18 欧元提高到 47 欧元。利用加泰罗尼亚 2013-20 年期间的市级数据,我们对比了研究期开始时在上门收集垃圾方面存在差异的城市。由于上门收集垃圾被认为在减少垃圾填埋方面特别有效,我们假设尚未采用这一系统的城市在应对税收变化方面有更大的余地。基于双向固定效应设计,我们的研究结果显示了对税收增加的巨大差异反应。与到 2013 年已实施上门收集垃圾的城市相比,我们估计那些尚未实施上门收集垃圾的城市对增税的反应是:垃圾填埋量额外减少了 12%,垃圾总量减少了 4%,回收垃圾和有机分类垃圾的比例分别增加了 6 个百分点和 2.5 个百分点。我们提供的提示性证据表明,采用上门收集垃圾是推动这些反应的主要机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fiscal Studies
Fiscal Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
1.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The Institute for Fiscal Studies publishes the journal Fiscal Studies, which serves as a bridge between academic research and policy. This esteemed journal, established in 1979, has gained global recognition for its publication of high-quality and original research papers. The articles, authored by prominent academics, policymakers, and practitioners, are presented in an accessible format, ensuring a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
Mortality inequality in Chile Is there a public sector earnings premium in UK healthcare? Market concentration and productivity: evidence from the UK Issue Information Labour market and income inequalities in the United Kingdom, 1968–2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1