High Complication and Revision Rates in Anatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with the Combination of Polyethylene and Cementless Convertible Metal-Backed Glenoid Components: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2024-02-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S442128
Klaus W J Hanisch
{"title":"High Complication and Revision Rates in Anatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with the Combination of Polyethylene and Cementless Convertible Metal-Backed Glenoid Components: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Klaus W J Hanisch","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S442128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historically, Metal-Backed (MB) glenoid components in anatomical total Shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) are prone to failure primarily due to loosening between the metal and bony surface. However, newer generations of MB glenoid components have performed well in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), with convertibility being considered to be the most significant benefit of MB components. Theoretically, MB components may be a viable option in \"Rotator cuff at risk\" cases. The aim of this study is to compare revisions versus revision-free survivorship and highlight problems associated with using convertible MB glenoid components in aTSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2015 and September 2018, aTSA was performed on 30 patients utilizing 32 implants with convertible MB glenoid (two patients were operated bilaterally). The first investigation was performed at a mean of 55.9 months (43-76) by search in the national registry for revisions with twelve cases. The second FU on all remaining patients without revisions was conducted at a mean of 54.9 months (46-71) through physical examination with fourteen patients (sixteen implants), with four patients missing. Demographic data, indications, complications, revisions, and re-operations were recorded for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High rates of complications led to revisions or re-operation in aTSA in combination with MB (15/32). Seven problems were associated with polyethylene (PE), which included loosening, disengagement, or wear. Eight complications were not directly associated with the MB component. There was one with loosening on the metal-bone interface side. Conversion to RSA was possible in three cases, and secondary cuff failure was seen once. High infection rates (2/32) led to a different strategy for antibiotics and preoperative preparations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MB glenoid components caused unacceptably high complication and revision rates in aTSA. PE wear, disengagement, or loosening were the main reasons for revisions. Therefore, procedures with MB glenoid components were abandoned in aTSA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV case series, treatment study.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10908272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S442128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Historically, Metal-Backed (MB) glenoid components in anatomical total Shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) are prone to failure primarily due to loosening between the metal and bony surface. However, newer generations of MB glenoid components have performed well in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), with convertibility being considered to be the most significant benefit of MB components. Theoretically, MB components may be a viable option in "Rotator cuff at risk" cases. The aim of this study is to compare revisions versus revision-free survivorship and highlight problems associated with using convertible MB glenoid components in aTSA.

Methods: Between December 2015 and September 2018, aTSA was performed on 30 patients utilizing 32 implants with convertible MB glenoid (two patients were operated bilaterally). The first investigation was performed at a mean of 55.9 months (43-76) by search in the national registry for revisions with twelve cases. The second FU on all remaining patients without revisions was conducted at a mean of 54.9 months (46-71) through physical examination with fourteen patients (sixteen implants), with four patients missing. Demographic data, indications, complications, revisions, and re-operations were recorded for each patient.

Results: High rates of complications led to revisions or re-operation in aTSA in combination with MB (15/32). Seven problems were associated with polyethylene (PE), which included loosening, disengagement, or wear. Eight complications were not directly associated with the MB component. There was one with loosening on the metal-bone interface side. Conversion to RSA was possible in three cases, and secondary cuff failure was seen once. High infection rates (2/32) led to a different strategy for antibiotics and preoperative preparations.

Conclusion: MB glenoid components caused unacceptably high complication and revision rates in aTSA. PE wear, disengagement, or loosening were the main reasons for revisions. Therefore, procedures with MB glenoid components were abandoned in aTSA.

Level of evidence: Level IV case series, treatment study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用聚乙烯和无水泥可转换金属支撑盂状关节组件的解剖型全肩关节置换术并发症和翻修率较高:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:从历史上看,解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)中的金属支撑(MB)盂状关节组件容易失效,主要原因是金属与骨表面之间的松动。不过,新一代的金属髋臼组件在反向肩关节置换术(RSA)中表现良好,可转换性被认为是金属髋臼组件的最大优点。从理论上讲,MB 组件可能是 "肩袖有风险 "病例的可行选择。本研究的目的是比较翻修与无翻修存活率,并强调在TSA中使用可转换MB髋臼组件的相关问题:2015年12月至2018年9月期间,对30名患者进行了aTSA手术,使用了32个带有可转换MB盂组件的植入物(两名患者进行了双侧手术)。第一次调查在平均 55.9 个月(43-76 个月)时进行,在全国翻修登记处搜索到 12 例病例。第二次调查是在平均 54.9 个月(46-71 个月)时,通过对 14 名患者(16 个种植体)进行体格检查,对其余所有未进行翻修的患者进行调查,其中有 4 名患者缺失。记录了每位患者的人口统计学数据、适应症、并发症、翻修和再手术情况:并发症的发生率很高,导致与 MB 结合使用的 aTSA(15/32)出现翻修或再次手术。七个问题与聚乙烯(PE)有关,包括松动、脱离或磨损。八种并发症与 MB 组件没有直接关系。有一个问题与金属-骨界面一侧的松动有关。有三个病例可能转为 RSA,有一次出现二次袖带失效。高感染率(2/32)导致了抗生素和术前准备策略的不同:结论:MB髋臼组件在ATSA中造成的并发症和翻修率高得令人无法接受。PE磨损、脱离或松动是翻修的主要原因。因此,ATSA放弃了使用MB髋臼组件的手术:IV级病例系列,治疗研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
期刊最新文献
3D Printing for Personalized Solutions in Cervical Spondylosis. Reconstruction of a Short Tibial Stump with a Long Fibula Using the Ilizarov Technique: A Case Study. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Open Reduction and Fixation of Late-Presenting Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures: A Prospective Study. Biomechanical Characteristics of Kissing Spine During Extension Using a Human Cadaveric Lumbar Spinal Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1