On Orthorexia Nervosa: A Systematic Review of Reviews.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Psychopathology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1159/000536379
Qin Xiang Ng, Dawn Yi Xin Lee, Chun En Yau, Ming Xuan Han, Jacqueline Jin Li Liew, Seth En Teoh, Clarence Ong, Clyve Yu Leon Yaow, Kuan Tsee Chee
{"title":"On Orthorexia Nervosa: A Systematic Review of Reviews.","authors":"Qin Xiang Ng, Dawn Yi Xin Lee, Chun En Yau, Ming Xuan Han, Jacqueline Jin Li Liew, Seth En Teoh, Clarence Ong, Clyve Yu Leon Yaow, Kuan Tsee Chee","doi":"10.1159/000536379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orthorexia nervosa (ON), characterized by a pathological preoccupation with \"extreme dietary purity,\" is increasingly observed as a mental health condition among young adults and the general population. However, its diagnosis is not formally recognized and has remained contentious.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this systematic review, we attempt to overview previous reviews on ON, focusing on the methodological and conceptual issues with ON. This would serve both as a summary and a way to highlight gaps in earlier research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review took reference from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, and using combinations of the search terms (\"orthorexia\" OR \"orthorexia nervosa\" OR \"ON\") AND (\"review\" OR \"systematic review\" OR \"meta-analysis\"), a literature search was performed on EMBASE, Medline and PsycINFO databases from inception up to October 31, 2023. Articles were included if (1) they were written or translated into English and (2) contained information pertaining to the diagnostic stability or validity of ON, or instruments used to measure ON symptoms and behaviors. Only review articles with a systematic literature search approach were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 reviews were qualitatively reviewed. Several studies have reported variable prevalence of ON and highlighted the lack of thoroughly evaluated measures of ON with clear psychometric properties, with no reliable estimates. ORTO-15 and its variations such as ORTO-11, ORTO-12 are popularly used, although their use is discouraged. Existing instruments lack specificity for pathology and several disagreements on the conceptualization and hence diagnostic criteria of ON exist.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Previous reviews have consistently highlighted the highly variable (and contradictory) prevalence rates with different instruments to measure ON, lack of stable factor structure and psychometrics across ON measures, paucity of data on ON in clinical samples, and a need for a modern re-conceptualization of ON. The diagnosis of ON is challenging as it likely spans a spectrum from \"normal\" to \"abnormal,\" and \"functional\" to \"dysfunctional.\" \"Non-pathological\" orthorexia is not related to psychopathological constructs in the same way that ON is.</p>","PeriodicalId":20723,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Orthorexia nervosa (ON), characterized by a pathological preoccupation with "extreme dietary purity," is increasingly observed as a mental health condition among young adults and the general population. However, its diagnosis is not formally recognized and has remained contentious.

Objective: In this systematic review, we attempt to overview previous reviews on ON, focusing on the methodological and conceptual issues with ON. This would serve both as a summary and a way to highlight gaps in earlier research.

Methods: This systematic review took reference from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, and using combinations of the search terms ("orthorexia" OR "orthorexia nervosa" OR "ON") AND ("review" OR "systematic review" OR "meta-analysis"), a literature search was performed on EMBASE, Medline and PsycINFO databases from inception up to October 31, 2023. Articles were included if (1) they were written or translated into English and (2) contained information pertaining to the diagnostic stability or validity of ON, or instruments used to measure ON symptoms and behaviors. Only review articles with a systematic literature search approach were included.

Results: A total of 22 reviews were qualitatively reviewed. Several studies have reported variable prevalence of ON and highlighted the lack of thoroughly evaluated measures of ON with clear psychometric properties, with no reliable estimates. ORTO-15 and its variations such as ORTO-11, ORTO-12 are popularly used, although their use is discouraged. Existing instruments lack specificity for pathology and several disagreements on the conceptualization and hence diagnostic criteria of ON exist.

Discussion: Previous reviews have consistently highlighted the highly variable (and contradictory) prevalence rates with different instruments to measure ON, lack of stable factor structure and psychometrics across ON measures, paucity of data on ON in clinical samples, and a need for a modern re-conceptualization of ON. The diagnosis of ON is challenging as it likely spans a spectrum from "normal" to "abnormal," and "functional" to "dysfunctional." "Non-pathological" orthorexia is not related to psychopathological constructs in the same way that ON is.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经性厌食症:系统性综述》。
简介神经性厌食症(ON)的特点是病态地专注于 "极端纯净饮食",越来越多的年轻人和普通人群将其视为一种心理健康问题。然而,它的诊断并没有得到正式认可,而且一直存在争议:在这篇系统性综述中,我们试图概述以往关于 "ON "的综述,重点关注 "ON "的方法论和概念问题。这既可以作为总结,也可以突出早期研究的不足之处:本系统综述参考了《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)报告指南,并使用检索词("orthorexia "或 "orthorexia nervosa "或 "ON")和("review "或 "systematic review "或 "meta-analysis")的组合,在EMBASE、Medline和PsycINFO数据库中进行了从开始到2023年10月31日的文献检索。如果文章(1)为英文撰写或翻译,且(2)包含与 ON 诊断稳定性或有效性相关的信息,或包含用于测量 ON 症状和行为的工具,则被纳入检索范围。只有采用系统文献检索方法的综述文章才被纳入:结果:共对 22 篇综述进行了定性审查。有几项研究报告了不同的ON患病率,并强调缺乏经过全面评估的、具有明确心理测量特性的ON测量方法,也没有可靠的估计值。ORTO-15及其变体,如ORTO-11、ORTO-12,尽管不鼓励使用,但仍被广泛使用。现有工具对病理学缺乏特异性,对ON的概念化和诊断标准也存在一些分歧:讨论:以往的综述一直强调,用不同的工具测量颅内压增高的患病率变化很大(而且相互矛盾),颅内压增高测量方法缺乏稳定的因素结构和心理测量学,临床样本中有关颅内压增高的数据很少,需要对颅内压增高进行现代重新概念化。ON的诊断具有挑战性,因为它可能跨越从 "正常 "到 "异常"、从 "功能性 "到 "功能障碍 "的范围。"非病理性 "厌食症与心理病理学结构的关系并不像厌食症那样密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopathology
Psychopathology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Psychopathology'' is a record of research centered on findings, concepts, and diagnostic categories of phenomenological, experimental and clinical psychopathology. Studies published are designed to improve and deepen the knowledge and understanding of the pathogenesis and nature of psychopathological symptoms and psychological dysfunctions. Furthermore, the validity of concepts applied in the neurosciences of mental functions are evaluated in order to closely bring together the mind and the brain. Major topics of the journal are trajectories between biological processes and psychological dysfunction that can help us better understand a subject’s inner experiences and interpersonal behavior. Descriptive psychopathology, experimental psychopathology and neuropsychology, developmental psychopathology, transcultural psychiatry as well as philosophy-based phenomenology contribute to this field.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Associations of Somatic Symptom Disorder with Personality Dysfunction and Specific Maladaptive Traits. Disembodiment and Affective Resonances in Esketamine Treatment of Depersonalized Depression Subtype: Two Case Studies. Making Sense of Spiritual, Metaphysical, and Eschatological Elements in Delusions: A Qualitative Study Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The Nested States Model: A Phenomenologically-Grounded Model of the Mind. Hallucinations and Vitamin B12 Deficiency: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1