Influence of stress-specific interventions on biomarker levels and cognitive function in cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-03 DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12716
Xiaotong Ding, Mingyue Zhu, Fang Zhao, Qing Wang, Jiyuan Shi, Zheng Li
{"title":"Influence of stress-specific interventions on biomarker levels and cognitive function in cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Xiaotong Ding,&nbsp;Mingyue Zhu,&nbsp;Fang Zhao,&nbsp;Qing Wang,&nbsp;Jiyuan Shi,&nbsp;Zheng Li","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer patients' psycho-physiological health is seriously affected by long-term exposure to stress. Many studies have explored the impact of stress-specific interventions on cancer patients' biomarker levels and cognitive functions. However, the current research findings are inconsistent, and their statistical power is limited by the small samples. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to verify the effect of stress-specific interventions on cancer patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The literature involved nine databases from the inception until January 13, 2024, extracted 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software was used to perform a meta-analysis, and the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2) was utilized for quality evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nine RCTs were assessed as having a low risk of bias, and others had a moderate risk. The results showed that stress-specific interventions had beneficial effects on patients' subjective cognition but uncertain impacts on their executive function, tumour necrosis factor-α level, morning cortisol level, and no effect on cortisol at other times, interleukin (IL)-10, IL-8, IL-6, IL-1, and C-reactive protein.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>More rigorous studies are required to elucidate the influence of stress-specific interventions on biomarker levels. The potential mechanism by which stress-specific interventions affect the cancer patient's cognitive function remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"29 3","pages":"609-628"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer patients' psycho-physiological health is seriously affected by long-term exposure to stress. Many studies have explored the impact of stress-specific interventions on cancer patients' biomarker levels and cognitive functions. However, the current research findings are inconsistent, and their statistical power is limited by the small samples. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to verify the effect of stress-specific interventions on cancer patients.

Methods

The literature involved nine databases from the inception until January 13, 2024, extracted 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software was used to perform a meta-analysis, and the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2) was utilized for quality evaluation.

Results

Nine RCTs were assessed as having a low risk of bias, and others had a moderate risk. The results showed that stress-specific interventions had beneficial effects on patients' subjective cognition but uncertain impacts on their executive function, tumour necrosis factor-α level, morning cortisol level, and no effect on cortisol at other times, interleukin (IL)-10, IL-8, IL-6, IL-1, and C-reactive protein.

Conclusion

More rigorous studies are required to elucidate the influence of stress-specific interventions on biomarker levels. The potential mechanism by which stress-specific interventions affect the cancer patient's cognitive function remains unclear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特定压力干预对癌症患者生物标志物水平和认知功能的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:癌症患者的心理生理健康受到长期压力的严重影响。许多研究探讨了针对压力的干预措施对癌症患者生物标志物水平和认知功能的影响。然而,目前的研究结果并不一致,而且由于样本较少,统计能力也受到限制。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以验证特定压力干预对癌症患者的影响:文献涉及 9 个数据库,从开始到 2024 年 1 月 13 日,提取了 19 项随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Review Manager(RevMan)5.4软件进行荟萃分析,并使用修订版Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB2)进行质量评估:9项研究被评估为低偏倚风险,其他研究为中度偏倚风险。结果表明,针对压力的干预措施对患者的主观认知有好处,但对其执行功能、肿瘤坏死因子-α水平、晨间皮质醇水平的影响不确定,对其他时间的皮质醇、白细胞介素(IL)-10、IL-8、IL-6、IL-1和C反应蛋白没有影响:结论:需要进行更严格的研究,以阐明特定压力干预对生物标志物水平的影响。压力特异性干预对癌症患者认知功能的潜在影响机制仍不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
期刊最新文献
Trait responsiveness to verbal suggestions predicts nocebo responding: A meta-analysis Perceiving immunity, predicting somatic symptoms: Validation of the ‘Perceived Immunity’ scale and its association with daily health A network analysis to explore illness perceptions in Black adults with type 2 diabetes Attributes and influencing factors of hope levels in breast cancer patients: A latent profile analysis The relationships among illness perceptions, dyadic coping and illness management in breast cancer patients and their spouses: A dyadic longitudinal mediation model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1