Retrospective review of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome presenting to the emergency department of a major tertiary center in Saudi Arabia.

Annals of Saudi medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2024.1
Muhammad Nauman Qureshi, Eman Nayaz Ahmed, Khaled Abdulrahman Ahmed, Eyad Bashtawi
{"title":"Retrospective review of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome presenting to the emergency department of a major tertiary center in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Muhammad Nauman Qureshi, Eman Nayaz Ahmed, Khaled Abdulrahman Ahmed, Eyad Bashtawi","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2024.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) comprises a spectrum of diseases ranging from unstable angina (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Treatment of ACS without STEMI (NSTEMI-ACS) can vary, depending on the severity of presentation and multiple other factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyze the NSTEMI-ACS patients in our institution.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary care institution with accredited chest pain center.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The travel time from ED booking to the final disposition for patients presenting with chest pain was retrieved over a period of 6 months. The duration of each phase of management was measured with a view to identify the factors that influence their management and time from the ED to their final destination. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Travel time from ED to final destination.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>300 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of patients were males (64%) between 61 and 80 years of age (45%). The median disposition time (from ED booking to admission order by the cardiology team) was 5 hours and 19 minutes. Cardiology admissions took 10 hours and 20 minutes from ED booking to the inpatient bed. UA was diagnosed in 153 (51%) patients and non-STEMI in 52 (17%). Coronary catheterization was required in 79 (26%) patients, 24 (8%) had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and 8 (3%) had both catheterization and CABG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The time from ED booking to final destination for NSTEMI-ACS patients is delayed due to multiple factors, which caused significant delays in overall management. Additional interventional steps can help improve the travel times, diagnosis, management and disposition of these patients.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Single center study done in a tertiary care center so the results from this study may not be extrapolated to other centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":93875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2024.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) comprises a spectrum of diseases ranging from unstable angina (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Treatment of ACS without STEMI (NSTEMI-ACS) can vary, depending on the severity of presentation and multiple other factors.

Objective: Analyze the NSTEMI-ACS patients in our institution.

Design: Retrospective observational.

Setting: A tertiary care institution with accredited chest pain center.

Patients and methods: The travel time from ED booking to the final disposition for patients presenting with chest pain was retrieved over a period of 6 months. The duration of each phase of management was measured with a view to identify the factors that influence their management and time from the ED to their final destination. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Main outcome measures: Travel time from ED to final destination.

Sample size: 300 patients.

Results: The majority of patients were males (64%) between 61 and 80 years of age (45%). The median disposition time (from ED booking to admission order by the cardiology team) was 5 hours and 19 minutes. Cardiology admissions took 10 hours and 20 minutes from ED booking to the inpatient bed. UA was diagnosed in 153 (51%) patients and non-STEMI in 52 (17%). Coronary catheterization was required in 79 (26%) patients, 24 (8%) had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and 8 (3%) had both catheterization and CABG.

Conclusion: The time from ED booking to final destination for NSTEMI-ACS patients is delayed due to multiple factors, which caused significant delays in overall management. Additional interventional steps can help improve the travel times, diagnosis, management and disposition of these patients.

Limitations: Single center study done in a tertiary care center so the results from this study may not be extrapolated to other centers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯一家大型三级医院急诊科非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的回顾性研究。
背景:急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)包括一系列疾病,从不稳定性心绞痛(UA)、非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(non-STEMI)到ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)。不伴有 STEMI 的 ACS(NSTEMI-ACS)的治疗方法因病情严重程度和其他多种因素而异:分析本院的 NSTEMI-ACS 患者:设计:回顾性观察:患者和方法:从急诊室预约到入院所需的时间:检索了 6 个月内胸痛患者从急诊室预约到最终处置所需的时间。测量了每个管理阶段的持续时间,以确定影响其管理和从急诊室到最终目的地的时间的因素。数据采用描述性统计方法进行分析:样本量:300 名患者:大多数患者为男性(64%),年龄在 61 至 80 岁之间(45%)。中位处置时间(从急诊室预约到心脏科团队下达入院指令)为 5 小时 19 分钟。心脏科患者从急诊室预约到入住病床需要 10 小时 20 分钟。153名患者(51%)被确诊为急性冠脉综合征,52名患者(17%)被确诊为非 STEMI。79名患者(26%)需要进行冠状动脉导管检查,24名患者(8%)需要进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),8名患者(3%)需要同时进行导管检查和冠状动脉旁路移植术:结论:由于多种因素,NSTEMI-ACS 患者从急诊室预约到最终目的地的时间被延迟,导致整体治疗严重延误。额外的介入治疗步骤有助于改善这些患者的旅行时间、诊断、管理和处置:局限性: 在一家三级医疗中心进行的单中心研究,因此研究结果可能无法推广到其他中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of recurrence of risk factors after transcatheter bronchial artery embolization for hemoptysis. Advanced trauma life support training outcomes in Saudi Arabia: a four-year multicenter analysis of influential characteristics and factors (2019-2023). Efficacy and safety of semaglutide: real-world tertiary care experience from Saudi Arabia. Application of digital slide scanning in external quality assessment program on intestinal parasites. Discharge against medical advice in pediatrics: a 10-year retrospective analysis in a tertiary care center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1