Cardiorespiratory demands of firearms training instruction and 15m shuttle tests in law enforcement.

Joseph Warwick, Sophie Cooper, Flaminia Ronca
{"title":"Cardiorespiratory demands of firearms training instruction and 15m shuttle tests in law enforcement.","authors":"Joseph Warwick, Sophie Cooper, Flaminia Ronca","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.27.24303347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Law enforcement agencies require minimum fitness standards to safeguard their officers and training staff. Firearms instructors (FI) are expected to maintain the same standards as their operational counterparts. This study aimed to quantify the daily physiological demands placed on FI. Methods: 19 FI (45 ± 5 years) completed occupational tasks whilst wearing heart rate (HR) monitors for a minimum 10 days. VO2max testing was conducted on FI during a treadmill test (TT) and a multistage shuttle test (ST). Linear regression models were used to model the relationship between VO2 and HR throughout the TT. This model was applied to HR data from occupational tasks to infer oxygen consumption. Repeated Measures ANOVAs were used to compare time spent in VO2max equivalent zones throughout. Results: The VO2max achieved during ST (45.1 ± 5.6 ml/kg/min) was significantly higher than TT (39 ± 3 ml/kg/min) (p = 0.014). Time to exhaustion was sooner on ST (06:26 min) compared to TT (13:16 min) (p < .001). FI spent ~85% of occupational time with an oxygen demand ≤20 ml/kg/min (p < .005). The most intense occupational tasks saw FI achieve a VO2max ≥30 ml/kg/min, but <40 ml/kg/min. Conclusion: Using ST to assess cardiorespiratory fitness resulted in a quicker time to exhaustion and a higher VO2max. Predominantly, FI occupational tasks are low intensity with sporadic exposures requiring a VO2max of >40 ml/kg/min. To safeguard FI from occupational-related cardiorespiratory or long-term health issues, it is intuitive to suggest fitness standards should exceed a VO2max of 40 ml/kg/min.","PeriodicalId":501555,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.27.24303347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Law enforcement agencies require minimum fitness standards to safeguard their officers and training staff. Firearms instructors (FI) are expected to maintain the same standards as their operational counterparts. This study aimed to quantify the daily physiological demands placed on FI. Methods: 19 FI (45 ± 5 years) completed occupational tasks whilst wearing heart rate (HR) monitors for a minimum 10 days. VO2max testing was conducted on FI during a treadmill test (TT) and a multistage shuttle test (ST). Linear regression models were used to model the relationship between VO2 and HR throughout the TT. This model was applied to HR data from occupational tasks to infer oxygen consumption. Repeated Measures ANOVAs were used to compare time spent in VO2max equivalent zones throughout. Results: The VO2max achieved during ST (45.1 ± 5.6 ml/kg/min) was significantly higher than TT (39 ± 3 ml/kg/min) (p = 0.014). Time to exhaustion was sooner on ST (06:26 min) compared to TT (13:16 min) (p < .001). FI spent ~85% of occupational time with an oxygen demand ≤20 ml/kg/min (p < .005). The most intense occupational tasks saw FI achieve a VO2max ≥30 ml/kg/min, but <40 ml/kg/min. Conclusion: Using ST to assess cardiorespiratory fitness resulted in a quicker time to exhaustion and a higher VO2max. Predominantly, FI occupational tasks are low intensity with sporadic exposures requiring a VO2max of >40 ml/kg/min. To safeguard FI from occupational-related cardiorespiratory or long-term health issues, it is intuitive to suggest fitness standards should exceed a VO2max of 40 ml/kg/min.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执法人员枪械训练教学和 15 米往返测试对心肺功能的要求。
目标:执法机构要求达到最低体能标准,以保障其警员和培训人员的安全。枪械教官(FI)应保持与其业务同行相同的标准。本研究旨在量化 FI 的日常生理需求。方法:19 名 FI(45 ± 5 岁)在佩戴心率 (HR) 监测器的情况下完成了至少 10 天的职业任务。在跑步机测试(TT)和多级穿梭测试(ST)中对 FI 进行了 VO2max 测试。线性回归模型用于模拟整个 TT 过程中 VO2 与心率之间的关系。该模型适用于职业任务中的心率数据,以推断耗氧量。重复测量方差分析用于比较整个过程中在 VO2 最大值等效区所花费的时间。结果ST(45.1 ± 5.6 毫升/千克/分钟)期间达到的最大氧消耗量明显高于 TT(39 ± 3 毫升/千克/分钟)(p = 0.014)。ST(06:26 分钟)与 TT(13:16 分钟)相比,力竭时间更短(p <.001)。FI 85% 的工作时间需氧量低于 20 ml/kg/min(p < .005)。在强度最大的职业任务中,FI 的最大 VO2 值≥30 毫升/千克/分钟,但为 40 毫升/千克/分钟。结论使用 ST 评估心肺功能会导致更快的力竭时间和更高的 VO2max。FI的职业任务主要是低强度的,零星的暴露要求VO2max达到<40 ml/kg/min。为了保护金融情报人员免受与职业相关的心肺或长期健康问题的影响,直观地说,体能标准应超过 40 毫升/千克/分钟的 VO2max。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In-utero exposure to PM2.5 and adverse birth outcomes in India: Geostatistical modelling using remote sensing and demographic health survey data 2019-21 Protocol for the Work And Vocational advicE (WAVE) randomised controlled trial testing the addition of vocational advice to usual primary care (Clinical Trials: NCT04543097) Harnessing non-standard nucleic acids for highly sensitive icosaplex (20-plex) detection of microbial threats Association of occupational exposure to chemical substances with bladder cancer in Ethiopia: A multi-center matched case-control Study The association between nurse staffing configurations and sickness absence: longitudinal study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1