Preliminary Feasibility, Acceptability and Referral Efficacy of a Drop-In Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Skills Group to Promote Enrollment in Standard DBT Skills Group

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive and Behavioral Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.cbpra.2024.01.003
Frances M. Aunon, Rachel F. Carretta, Joshua Lovell, Noah R. Wolkowicz, Suzanne E. Decker
{"title":"Preliminary Feasibility, Acceptability and Referral Efficacy of a Drop-In Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Skills Group to Promote Enrollment in Standard DBT Skills Group","authors":"Frances M. Aunon, Rachel F. Carretta, Joshua Lovell, Noah R. Wolkowicz, Suzanne E. Decker","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpra.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pretreatment interventions have been shown to increase treatment readiness, initiation, and participation in evidence-based treatments. To promote enrollment in an evidence-based Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Group (DBT; ), we developed a pretreatment Drop-In DBT Skills Group and evaluated the group’s feasibility, acceptability, and referral efficacy. Each session included a mindfulness practice and one of four introductory DBT skills. We assessed the Drop-In DBT Skill Group’s feasibility (clients attending ≥1 session), acceptability (clients attending ≥2 sessions), and referral efficacy (clients who sought referrals to the standard DBT Skills Group). In 8 months, 44 clients were referred to the Drop-In DBT Skills Group; 37 clients completed the screening process (84%). Of the 37 clients who responded to outreach, 32 attended ≥1 group or had already started the DBT Skills Group (86.5%; feasibility). Of the 32 clients who attended at least one group, 29 clients attended ≥2 Drop-In DBT Skills Groups or started the DBT Sills Group (90.6%; acceptability). Ultimately, 17 clients, including 13 DBT-ambivalent clients and 4 waitlisted clients, requested a referral to the standard DBT Skills Group. The Drop-In DBT Skills Group shows strong feasibility, acceptability, and referral efficacy in helping more ambivalent clients enroll in DBT Skills Group.","PeriodicalId":51511,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2024.01.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pretreatment interventions have been shown to increase treatment readiness, initiation, and participation in evidence-based treatments. To promote enrollment in an evidence-based Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Group (DBT; ), we developed a pretreatment Drop-In DBT Skills Group and evaluated the group’s feasibility, acceptability, and referral efficacy. Each session included a mindfulness practice and one of four introductory DBT skills. We assessed the Drop-In DBT Skill Group’s feasibility (clients attending ≥1 session), acceptability (clients attending ≥2 sessions), and referral efficacy (clients who sought referrals to the standard DBT Skills Group). In 8 months, 44 clients were referred to the Drop-In DBT Skills Group; 37 clients completed the screening process (84%). Of the 37 clients who responded to outreach, 32 attended ≥1 group or had already started the DBT Skills Group (86.5%; feasibility). Of the 32 clients who attended at least one group, 29 clients attended ≥2 Drop-In DBT Skills Groups or started the DBT Sills Group (90.6%; acceptability). Ultimately, 17 clients, including 13 DBT-ambivalent clients and 4 waitlisted clients, requested a referral to the standard DBT Skills Group. The Drop-In DBT Skills Group shows strong feasibility, acceptability, and referral efficacy in helping more ambivalent clients enroll in DBT Skills Group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以 "随到随学 "的辩证行为疗法 (DBT) 技能小组促进标准 DBT 技能小组注册的初步可行性、可接受性和转介效果
治疗前干预已被证明可以提高循证治疗的治疗准备度、启动度和参与度。为了提高循证辩证行为疗法技能小组(DBT;)的注册率,我们开发了一种治疗前即兴 DBT 技能小组,并对该小组的可行性、可接受性和转介效果进行了评估。每节课都包括正念练习和四种 DBT 入门技能中的一种。我们评估了DBT技能小组的可行性(参加次数≥1次的客户)、可接受性(参加次数≥2次的客户)和转介效果(寻求转介到标准DBT技能小组的客户)。8 个月内,44 名客户被转介到 "DBT 技能小组";37 名客户完成了筛选过程(84%)。在回应外联的 37 名客户中,32 人参加了≥ 1 个小组或已经开始参加 DBT 技能小组(86.5%;可行性)。在至少参加了一个小组的 32 名客户中,有 29 名客户参加了≥2 个 "DBT 技能小组"(Drop-In DBT Skills Groups)或开始了 DBT Sills 小组(90.6%;可接受性)。最终,17 名客户(包括 13 名 DBT 不适应客户和 4 名候补客户)要求转介到标准 DBT 技能小组。随到随学 DBT 技能小组在帮助更多矛盾的客户加入 DBT 技能小组方面显示出很强的可行性、可接受性和转介效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive and Behavioral Practice is a quarterly international journal that serves an enduring resource for empirically informed methods of clinical practice. Its mission is to bridge the gap between published research and the actual clinical practice of cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice publishes clinically rich accounts of innovative assessment and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are clearly grounded in empirical research. A focus on application and implementation of procedures is maintained.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mapping Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills to Clinical Domains Implicated in Contemporary Addiction Research: A Conceptual Synthesis and Promise for Precision Medicine TEAM-CBT for Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression and Anxiety: Testing Short-Term Impact and Within-Session Change Narrative Exposure Therapy for a Traumatic Birth Experience With the Non-Birthing Parent: A Single Case Study Disorders in Disguise: Proposed Clinical Competencies in Eating Disorders for All Child and Adolescent Mental Health Providers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1