Using an intersectionality-based approach to evaluate mental health services use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1017/S2045796024000143
Ivan Marbaniang, Erica E M Moodie, Eric Latimer, Shayna Skakoon-Sparling, Trevor A Hart, Daniel Grace, David M Moore, Nathan J Lachowsky, Jody Jollimore, Gilles Lambert, Terri Zhang, Milada Dvorakova, Joseph Cox
{"title":"Using an intersectionality-based approach to evaluate mental health services use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.","authors":"Ivan Marbaniang, Erica E M Moodie, Eric Latimer, Shayna Skakoon-Sparling, Trevor A Hart, Daniel Grace, David M Moore, Nathan J Lachowsky, Jody Jollimore, Gilles Lambert, Terri Zhang, Milada Dvorakova, Joseph Cox","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To cope with homonegativity-generated stress, gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM) use more mental health services (MHS) compared with heterosexual men. Most previous research on MHS among GBM uses data from largely white HIV-negative samples. Using an intersectionality-based approach, we evaluated the concomitant impact of racialization and HIV stigma on MHS use among GBM, through the mediating role of perceived discrimination (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used baseline data from 2371 GBM enrolled in the Engage cohort study, collected between 2017 and 2019, in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver, using respondent-driven sampling. The exposure was GBM groups: <b>Group 1</b> (<i>n</i> = 1376): white HIV-negative; <b>Group 2</b> (<i>n</i> = 327): white living with HIV; <b>Group 3</b> (<i>n</i> = 577): racialized as non-white HIV-negative; <b>Group 4</b> (<i>n</i> = 91): racialized as non-white living with HIV. The mediator was interpersonal PD scores measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (5-item version). The outcome was MHS use (yes/no) in the prior 6 months. We fit a three-way decomposition of causal mediation effects utilizing the imputation method for natural effect models. We obtained odds ratios (ORs) for pure direct effect (PDE, unmediated effect), pure indirect effect (PIE, mediated effect), mediated interaction effect (MIE, effect due to interaction between the exposure and mediator) and total effect (TE, overall effect). Analyses controlled for age, chronic mental health condition, Canadian citizenship, being cisgender and city of enrolment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean PD scores were highest for racialized HIV-negative GBM (10.3, SD: 5.0) and lowest for white HIV-negative GBM (8.4, SD: 3.9). MHS use was highest in white GBM living with HIV (GBMHIV) (40.4%) and lowest in racialized HIV-negative GBM (26.9%). Compared with white HIV-negative GBM, white GBMHIV had higher TE (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.29) and PDE (OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.24), and racialized HIV-negative GBM had higher PIE (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.17). Effects for racialized GBMHIV did not significantly differ from those of white HIV-negative GBM. MIEs across all groups were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher MHS use was observed among white GBMHIV compared with white HIV-negative GBM. PD positively mediated MHS use only among racialized HIV-negative GBM. MHS may need to take into account the intersecting impact of homonegativity, racism and HIV stigma on the mental health of GBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796024000143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To cope with homonegativity-generated stress, gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM) use more mental health services (MHS) compared with heterosexual men. Most previous research on MHS among GBM uses data from largely white HIV-negative samples. Using an intersectionality-based approach, we evaluated the concomitant impact of racialization and HIV stigma on MHS use among GBM, through the mediating role of perceived discrimination (PD).

Methods: We used baseline data from 2371 GBM enrolled in the Engage cohort study, collected between 2017 and 2019, in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver, using respondent-driven sampling. The exposure was GBM groups: Group 1 (n = 1376): white HIV-negative; Group 2 (n = 327): white living with HIV; Group 3 (n = 577): racialized as non-white HIV-negative; Group 4 (n = 91): racialized as non-white living with HIV. The mediator was interpersonal PD scores measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (5-item version). The outcome was MHS use (yes/no) in the prior 6 months. We fit a three-way decomposition of causal mediation effects utilizing the imputation method for natural effect models. We obtained odds ratios (ORs) for pure direct effect (PDE, unmediated effect), pure indirect effect (PIE, mediated effect), mediated interaction effect (MIE, effect due to interaction between the exposure and mediator) and total effect (TE, overall effect). Analyses controlled for age, chronic mental health condition, Canadian citizenship, being cisgender and city of enrolment.

Results: Mean PD scores were highest for racialized HIV-negative GBM (10.3, SD: 5.0) and lowest for white HIV-negative GBM (8.4, SD: 3.9). MHS use was highest in white GBM living with HIV (GBMHIV) (40.4%) and lowest in racialized HIV-negative GBM (26.9%). Compared with white HIV-negative GBM, white GBMHIV had higher TE (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.29) and PDE (OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.24), and racialized HIV-negative GBM had higher PIE (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.17). Effects for racialized GBMHIV did not significantly differ from those of white HIV-negative GBM. MIEs across all groups were comparable.

Conclusions: Higher MHS use was observed among white GBMHIV compared with white HIV-negative GBM. PD positively mediated MHS use only among racialized HIV-negative GBM. MHS may need to take into account the intersecting impact of homonegativity, racism and HIV stigma on the mental health of GBM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用基于交叉性的方法,评估蒙特利尔、多伦多和温哥华的男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者使用心理健康服务的情况。
目的:与异性恋男性相比,同性恋、双性恋和其他男性同性性行为者(GBM)为了应对同性恋产生的压力,会使用更多的心理健康服务(MHS)。之前关于男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者的心理健康服务的研究大多使用的是白人 HIV 阴性样本的数据。我们采用基于交叉性的方法,通过感知歧视(PD)的中介作用,评估了种族化和 HIV 耻辱感对男男性行为者使用心理健康服务的影响:我们使用了 2017 年至 2019 年期间在蒙特利尔、多伦多和温哥华通过受访者驱动抽样收集的参与队列研究的 2371 名 GBM 的基线数据。暴露对象为 GBM 组:第 1 组(n = 1376):HIV 阴性的白人;第 2 组(n = 327):感染 HIV 的白人;第 3 组(n = 577):种族化为 HIV 阴性的非白人;第 4 组(n = 91):种族化为感染 HIV 的非白人。调解因素是使用日常歧视量表(5 个项目版)测量的人际 PD 分数。结果是在过去 6 个月中使用过 MHS(是/否)。我们利用自然效应模型的估算方法对因果中介效应进行了三向分解。我们得出了纯直接效应(PDE,非中介效应)、纯间接效应(PIE,中介效应)、中介交互效应(MIE,暴露与中介之间的交互效应)和总效应(TE,总体效应)的几率比(ORs)。分析对年龄、慢性精神健康状况、加拿大公民身份、顺式性别和入学城市进行了控制:种族化 HIV 阴性 GBM 的 PD 平均得分最高(10.3,SD:5.0),白人 HIV 阴性 GBM 的 PD 平均得分最低(8.4,SD:3.9)。在感染艾滋病毒的白人 GBM(GBMHIV)中,使用 MHS 的比例最高(40.4%),而在艾滋病毒阴性的种族化 GBM 中,使用 MHS 的比例最低(26.9%)。与白人 HIV 阴性 GBM 相比,白人 GBMHIV 的 TE(OR:1.71;95% CI:1.27,2.29)和 PDE(OR:1.68;95% CI:1.27,2.24)更高,而种族化 HIV 阴性 GBM 的 PIE(OR:1.09;95% CI:1.02,1.17)更高。种族化 GBMHIV 的效应与白人 HIV 阴性 GBM 的效应无明显差异。所有群体的 MIEs 具有可比性:结论:与白人 HIV 阴性 GBM 相比,白人 GBMHIV 使用 MHS 的比例更高。只有在种族化的 HIV 阴性 GBM 中,PD 对 MHS 的使用有积极的中介作用。心理健康服务可能需要考虑到同性恋、种族主义和 HIV 耻辱感对 GBM 心理健康的交叉影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.20%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences is a prestigious international, peer-reviewed journal that has been publishing in Open Access format since 2020. Formerly known as Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale and established in 1992 by Michele Tansella, the journal prioritizes highly relevant and innovative research articles and systematic reviews in the areas of public mental health and policy, mental health services and system research, as well as epidemiological and social psychiatry. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in these critical fields.
期刊最新文献
Interactions of the CSF3R polymorphism and early stress on future orientation: evidence for the differential model of stress-related growth. The pain and mental health comorbidity. Effectiveness of group problem management plus in distressed Syrian refugees in Türkiye: a randomized controlled trial. Let's talk about recovery in mental health: an international Delphi study of experts by experience. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and suicide: a longitudinal study in Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1