Estimating Body Weight From Measurements From Different Single-Slice Computed Tomography Levels: An Evaluation of Total Cross-Sectional Body Area Measurements and Deep Learning.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1097/RCT.0000000000001587
Shota Ichikawa, Hiroyuki Sugimori
{"title":"Estimating Body Weight From Measurements From Different Single-Slice Computed Tomography Levels: An Evaluation of Total Cross-Sectional Body Area Measurements and Deep Learning.","authors":"Shota Ichikawa, Hiroyuki Sugimori","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the estimated body weight obtained from 2 easy-to-perform methods and the actual body weight at different computed tomography (CT) levels and determine the best reference site for estimating body weight.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 862 patients from a public database of whole-body positron emission tomography/CT studies were retrospectively analyzed. Two methods for estimating body weight at 10 single-slice CT levels were evaluated: a linear regression model using total cross-sectional body area and a deep learning-based model. The accuracy of body weight estimation was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Spearman rank correlation coefficient ( ρ ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the linear regression models, the estimated body weight at the T5 level correlated best with the actual body weight (MAE, 5.39 kg; RMSE, 7.01 kg; ρ = 0.912). The deep learning-based models showed the best accuracy at the L5 level (MAE, 6.72 kg; RMSE, 8.82 kg; ρ = 0.865).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although both methods were feasible for estimating body weight at different single-slice CT levels, the linear regression model using total cross-sectional body area at the T5 level as an input variable was the most favorable method for single-slice CT analysis for estimating body weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":"424-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the estimated body weight obtained from 2 easy-to-perform methods and the actual body weight at different computed tomography (CT) levels and determine the best reference site for estimating body weight.

Methods: A total of 862 patients from a public database of whole-body positron emission tomography/CT studies were retrospectively analyzed. Two methods for estimating body weight at 10 single-slice CT levels were evaluated: a linear regression model using total cross-sectional body area and a deep learning-based model. The accuracy of body weight estimation was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Spearman rank correlation coefficient ( ρ ).

Results: In the linear regression models, the estimated body weight at the T5 level correlated best with the actual body weight (MAE, 5.39 kg; RMSE, 7.01 kg; ρ = 0.912). The deep learning-based models showed the best accuracy at the L5 level (MAE, 6.72 kg; RMSE, 8.82 kg; ρ = 0.865).

Conclusions: Although both methods were feasible for estimating body weight at different single-slice CT levels, the linear regression model using total cross-sectional body area at the T5 level as an input variable was the most favorable method for single-slice CT analysis for estimating body weight.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据不同单片计算机断层扫描水平的测量结果估算体重:对总横截面积测量和深度学习的评估。
研究目的本研究旨在评估在不同计算机断层扫描(CT)水平下,通过两种易于操作的方法获得的估计体重与实际体重之间的相关性,并确定估计体重的最佳参考部位:方法:我们对公共数据库中的全身正电子发射断层扫描/CT 研究的 862 名患者进行了回顾性分析。评估了在 10 个单片 CT 水平上估算体重的两种方法:一种是使用身体总横截面积的线性回归模型,另一种是基于深度学习的模型。使用平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和斯皮尔曼秩相关系数(ρ)评估了体重估计的准确性:在线性回归模型中,T5 水平的估计体重与实际体重的相关性最好(MAE,5.39 千克;RMSE,7.01 千克;ρ = 0.912)。基于深度学习的模型在 L5 水平显示出最佳准确性(MAE,6.72 千克;RMSE,8.82 千克;ρ = 0.865):尽管这两种方法都可用于估算不同单片 CT 水平的体重,但将 T5 水平的总横截面积作为输入变量的线性回归模型是单片 CT 分析中估算体重的最有利方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging Combined With Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen for Grading Cervical cancer. Evaluating the Efficacy of Deep Learning Reconstruction in Reducing Radiation Dose for Computer-Aided Volumetry for Liver Tumor: A Phantom Study. Improving Image Quality and Visualization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Arterial Phase Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement-Boost Technique. Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumor and Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: A Report of 5 Cases, Including 2 Skull Base Cases With Arterial Spin Label Perfusion. Application of a Deep Learning-Based Contrast-Boosting Algorithm to Low-Dose Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography With Reduced Iodine Load.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1