Virtual Reality for the Management of Pain and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Randomized Study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Systems Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1007/s10916-024-02039-1
Fabien Squara, Jules Bateau, Didier Scarlatti, Sok-Sithikun Bun, Pamela Moceri, Emile Ferrari
{"title":"Virtual Reality for the Management of Pain and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Randomized Study.","authors":"Fabien Squara, Jules Bateau, Didier Scarlatti, Sok-Sithikun Bun, Pamela Moceri, Emile Ferrari","doi":"10.1007/s10916-024-02039-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Virtual Reality Headset (VRH) is a device aiming at improving patient's comfort by reducing pain and anxiety during medical interventions. Its interest during cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implant procedures has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized consecutive patients admitted for pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) at our center to either standard analgesia care (STD-Group), or to VRH (VRH-Group). Patients in the STD-Group received intra-venous paracetamol (1 g) 60 min before the procedure, and local anesthesia was performed with lidocaine. For patients of the VRH-Group, VRH was used on top of standard care. We monitored patients' pain and anxiety using numeric rating scales (from 0 to 10) at the time of sub-cutaneous pocket creation, and during deep axillary vein puncture. Patient comfort during the procedure was assessed using a detailed questionnaire. Morphine consumption was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 61 patients to STD-Group (n = 31) or VRH-Group (n = 30). Pain and anxiety were lower in the VRH-Group during deep venous puncture (3.0 ± 2.0 vs. 4.8 ± 2.2, p = 0.002 and 2.4 ± 2.2 vs. 4.1 ± 2.4, p = 0.006) but not during pocket creation (p = 0.58 and p = 0.5). Morphine consumption was lower in the VRH-Group (1.6 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 1.1 mg; p = 0.041). Patients' overall comfort during procedure was similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VRH use improved pain and anxiety control during deep venous puncture compared to standard analgesia care, and allowed morphine consumption reduction. However, pain and anxiety were similar at the time of sub-cutaneous pocket creation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"48 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02039-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Virtual Reality Headset (VRH) is a device aiming at improving patient's comfort by reducing pain and anxiety during medical interventions. Its interest during cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implant procedures has not been studied.

Methods: We randomized consecutive patients admitted for pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) at our center to either standard analgesia care (STD-Group), or to VRH (VRH-Group). Patients in the STD-Group received intra-venous paracetamol (1 g) 60 min before the procedure, and local anesthesia was performed with lidocaine. For patients of the VRH-Group, VRH was used on top of standard care. We monitored patients' pain and anxiety using numeric rating scales (from 0 to 10) at the time of sub-cutaneous pocket creation, and during deep axillary vein puncture. Patient comfort during the procedure was assessed using a detailed questionnaire. Morphine consumption was also assessed.

Results: We randomized 61 patients to STD-Group (n = 31) or VRH-Group (n = 30). Pain and anxiety were lower in the VRH-Group during deep venous puncture (3.0 ± 2.0 vs. 4.8 ± 2.2, p = 0.002 and 2.4 ± 2.2 vs. 4.1 ± 2.4, p = 0.006) but not during pocket creation (p = 0.58 and p = 0.5). Morphine consumption was lower in the VRH-Group (1.6 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 1.1 mg; p = 0.041). Patients' overall comfort during procedure was similar in both groups.

Conclusion: VRH use improved pain and anxiety control during deep venous puncture compared to standard analgesia care, and allowed morphine consumption reduction. However, pain and anxiety were similar at the time of sub-cutaneous pocket creation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟现实技术用于治疗植入起搏器或植入式心脏除颤器患者的疼痛和焦虑:一项随机研究。
背景:虚拟现实头盔(VRH)是一种旨在通过减少医疗干预过程中的疼痛和焦虑来提高患者舒适度的设备。但在心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)植入过程中,虚拟现实头戴式耳机的作用尚未得到研究:我们将在本中心接受起搏器或植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗的连续患者随机分为标准镇痛护理组(STD 组)和 VRH 组(VRH 组)。STD 组患者在手术前 60 分钟静脉注射扑热息痛(1 克),并使用利多卡因进行局部麻醉。对于 VRH 组患者,则在标准护理的基础上使用 VRH。我们使用数字评分量表(从 0 到 10)监测患者在皮下口袋创建时和腋窝深静脉穿刺时的疼痛和焦虑情况。我们还使用一份详细的问卷对患者在手术过程中的舒适度进行了评估。此外,还对吗啡消耗量进行了评估:我们将 61 名患者随机分为 STD 组(31 人)和 VRH 组(30 人)。深静脉穿刺时,VRH 组患者的疼痛和焦虑程度较低(3.0 ± 2.0 vs. 4.8 ± 2.2,p = 0.002 和 2.4 ± 2.2 vs. 4.1 ± 2.4,p = 0.006),但创建口袋时的疼痛和焦虑程度较低(p = 0.58 和 p = 0.5)。VRH组的吗啡消耗量较低(1.6 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 1.1 mg; p = 0.041)。两组患者在手术过程中的总体舒适度相似:结论:与标准镇痛护理相比,使用 VRH 可改善深静脉穿刺过程中的疼痛和焦虑控制,并可减少吗啡用量。结论:与标准镇痛护理相比,使用 VRH 可改善深静脉穿刺时的疼痛和焦虑控制,减少吗啡用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
期刊最新文献
Garbage In, Garbage Out? Negative Impact of Physiological Waveform Artifacts in a Hospital Clinical Data Warehouse. 21st Century Cures Act and Information Blocking: How Have Different Specialties Responded? Self-Supervised Learning for Near-Wild Cognitive Workload Estimation. Electronic Health Records Sharing Based on Consortium Blockchain. Large Language Models in Healthcare: An Urgent Call for Ongoing, Rigorous Validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1