Racial Disparities in 30-day Readmission After Orthopaedic Surgery: A 5-year National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Analysis.

Victoria E Bergstein, Lucy R O'Sullivan, Kenneth H Levy, Ettore Vulcano, Amiethab A Aiyer
{"title":"Racial Disparities in 30-day Readmission After Orthopaedic Surgery: A 5-year National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Analysis.","authors":"Victoria E Bergstein, Lucy R O'Sullivan, Kenneth H Levy, Ettore Vulcano, Amiethab A Aiyer","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Readmission rate after surgery is an important outcome measure in revealing disparities. This study aimed to examine how 30-day readmission rates and causes of readmission differ by race and specific injury areas within orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Surgeon-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for orthopaedic procedures from 2015 to 2019. Patients were stratified by self-reported race. Procedures were stratified using current procedural terminology codes corresponding to given injury areas. Multiple logistic regression was done to evaluate associations between race and all-cause readmission risk, and risk of readmission due to specific causes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 780,043 orthopaedic patients, the overall 30-day readmission rate was 4.18%. Black and Asian patients were at greater (OR = 1.18, P < 0.01) and lesser (OR = 0.76, P < 0.01) risk for readmission than White patients, respectively. Black patients were more likely to be readmitted for deep surgical site infection (OR = 1.25, P = 0.03), PE (OR = 1.64, P < 0.01), or wound disruption (OR = 1.45, P < 0.01). For all races, all-cause readmission was highest after spine procedures and lowest after hand/wrist procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black patients were at greater risk for overall, spine, shoulder/elbow, hand/wrist, and hip/knee all-cause readmission. Asian patients were at lower risk for overall, spine, hand/wrist, and hip/knee surgery all-cause readmission. Our findings can identify complications that should be more carefully monitored in certain patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10906581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Readmission rate after surgery is an important outcome measure in revealing disparities. This study aimed to examine how 30-day readmission rates and causes of readmission differ by race and specific injury areas within orthopaedic surgery.

Methods: The American College of Surgeon-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for orthopaedic procedures from 2015 to 2019. Patients were stratified by self-reported race. Procedures were stratified using current procedural terminology codes corresponding to given injury areas. Multiple logistic regression was done to evaluate associations between race and all-cause readmission risk, and risk of readmission due to specific causes.

Results: Of 780,043 orthopaedic patients, the overall 30-day readmission rate was 4.18%. Black and Asian patients were at greater (OR = 1.18, P < 0.01) and lesser (OR = 0.76, P < 0.01) risk for readmission than White patients, respectively. Black patients were more likely to be readmitted for deep surgical site infection (OR = 1.25, P = 0.03), PE (OR = 1.64, P < 0.01), or wound disruption (OR = 1.45, P < 0.01). For all races, all-cause readmission was highest after spine procedures and lowest after hand/wrist procedures.

Conclusions: Black patients were at greater risk for overall, spine, shoulder/elbow, hand/wrist, and hip/knee all-cause readmission. Asian patients were at lower risk for overall, spine, hand/wrist, and hip/knee surgery all-cause readmission. Our findings can identify complications that should be more carefully monitored in certain patient populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨科手术后 30 天再入院的种族差异:为期 5 年的国家外科质量改进计划数据库分析》(National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Analysis)。
背景:术后再入院率是揭示差异的重要结果指标。本研究旨在探讨骨科手术中不同种族和特定损伤部位的 30 天再入院率和再入院原因有何不同:对美国外科医生学会-国家外科质量改进计划数据库中 2015 年至 2019 年的骨科手术进行了查询。根据自我报告的种族对患者进行分层。使用与特定损伤部位相对应的当前手术术语代码对手术进行分层。多元逻辑回归评估了种族与全因再入院风险以及特定原因导致的再入院风险之间的关联:在 780,043 名骨科患者中,30 天再入院的总体比例为 4.18%。与白人患者相比,黑人和亚裔患者的再入院风险分别更高(OR = 1.18,P < 0.01)和更低(OR = 0.76,P < 0.01)。黑人患者更有可能因深部手术部位感染(OR = 1.25,P = 0.03)、PE(OR = 1.64,P < 0.01)或伤口破坏(OR = 1.45,P < 0.01)而再次入院。在所有种族中,脊柱手术后全因再入院率最高,手/腕部手术后最低:结论:黑人患者在总体、脊柱、肩/肘、手/腕和髋/膝关节全因再入院风险较高。亚裔患者在整体、脊柱、手/腕和髋/膝手术中因各种原因再入院的风险较低。我们的研究结果可以确定在某些患者群体中应更仔细监测的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of the Clavicle in a Softball Player. Comments on "Readability Analysis of Patient Education Material on Rotator Cuff Injuries From the Top 25 Ranking Orthopedic Institutions". Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Overused Among Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty? Sacral U-type Fractures in Patients Older Than 65 years. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Standard Posterior Approach for Femoral Neck Fracture in Elderly Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1