Ureteral stent related symptoms: A comparative study.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.4081/aiua.2024.12231
Themistoklis Ch Bellos, Ioannis S Manolitsis, Stamatios N Katsimperis, Panagiotis A Angelopoulos, Sotirios G Kapsalos-Dedes, Panagiotis K Deligiannis, Lazaros I Tzelves, Nikolaos A Kostakopoulos, Iraklis C Mitsogiannis, Ioannis M Varkarakis, Athanasios G Papatsoris, Andreas A Skolarikos, Charalampos N Deliveliotis
{"title":"Ureteral stent related symptoms: A comparative study.","authors":"Themistoklis Ch Bellos, Ioannis S Manolitsis, Stamatios N Katsimperis, Panagiotis A Angelopoulos, Sotirios G Kapsalos-Dedes, Panagiotis K Deligiannis, Lazaros I Tzelves, Nikolaos A Kostakopoulos, Iraklis C Mitsogiannis, Ioannis M Varkarakis, Athanasios G Papatsoris, Andreas A Skolarikos, Charalampos N Deliveliotis","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.12231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In urology, ureteral stents are used to treat obstructive diseases. Hematuria (54%), fever, discomfort, and lower urinary system symptoms are the predominant symptoms related to ureteral stent.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This article links stent symptoms to double-j width and length, as well as patient's height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). Ureteric Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) was used to measure ureteral stent symptoms at 1st and 4th week of stent in situ as well as the 4th week after pigtail removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 200-patient prospective study, where patients were allocated into four groups following ureteral stent insertion depending on the stent characteristics. Those groups were: 4.8 Fr./26 cm (Group A), 4.8 Fr./28 cm (Group B), 6 Fr/26 cm (Group C), and 6 Fr/28 cm (Group D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men comprised 53.5% of 200 patients. Participants had an average age of 49 ± 15.5 years, height of 175 ± 8.94 cm, and BMI of 23.8 ± 7.6 cm. The laboratory results were identical between groups. At the first and fourth week, groups had similar urine symptoms, pain severity, health status and occupational activities. The difference in pain location was statistically significant. Group A had 82.4% renal back pain in the first week, whereas Group B had 68.8%, Group C 31.3% and Group D 62.5 (p=0.04). At the fourth week, 64.7% of Group A patients reported kidney front pain, compared to 100% of Group B, 93.3% of Group C, and 100% of Group D (p=0.04). There was statistical significance in the sexual activity of the patients. 24.4% of Group C patients stopped sexual activity before stent installation, compared to 10.6%, 8.3%, and 6.4% of the other groups (p=0.03). A moderate percentage of patients had active sexual activity at week 4 (Group A: 7.8%, Group B: 5.8%, Group C: 8.2%, Group D: 4.1%), p=0.83. In multivariate analysis, urinary catheter group, age, weight, height, and BMI did not significantly affect urine index score (UIS), pain index score (PIS), general health (GH), quality of work (QW), and quality of sex (QS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite various attempts to establish the best ureteral stent, the effect of double-j stent physical features on stent-related symptoms remained unknown. No verdict is conceivable without adequate empirical data.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In urology, ureteral stents are used to treat obstructive diseases. Hematuria (54%), fever, discomfort, and lower urinary system symptoms are the predominant symptoms related to ureteral stent.

Aim: This article links stent symptoms to double-j width and length, as well as patient's height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). Ureteric Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) was used to measure ureteral stent symptoms at 1st and 4th week of stent in situ as well as the 4th week after pigtail removal.

Methods: A 200-patient prospective study, where patients were allocated into four groups following ureteral stent insertion depending on the stent characteristics. Those groups were: 4.8 Fr./26 cm (Group A), 4.8 Fr./28 cm (Group B), 6 Fr/26 cm (Group C), and 6 Fr/28 cm (Group D).

Results: Men comprised 53.5% of 200 patients. Participants had an average age of 49 ± 15.5 years, height of 175 ± 8.94 cm, and BMI of 23.8 ± 7.6 cm. The laboratory results were identical between groups. At the first and fourth week, groups had similar urine symptoms, pain severity, health status and occupational activities. The difference in pain location was statistically significant. Group A had 82.4% renal back pain in the first week, whereas Group B had 68.8%, Group C 31.3% and Group D 62.5 (p=0.04). At the fourth week, 64.7% of Group A patients reported kidney front pain, compared to 100% of Group B, 93.3% of Group C, and 100% of Group D (p=0.04). There was statistical significance in the sexual activity of the patients. 24.4% of Group C patients stopped sexual activity before stent installation, compared to 10.6%, 8.3%, and 6.4% of the other groups (p=0.03). A moderate percentage of patients had active sexual activity at week 4 (Group A: 7.8%, Group B: 5.8%, Group C: 8.2%, Group D: 4.1%), p=0.83. In multivariate analysis, urinary catheter group, age, weight, height, and BMI did not significantly affect urine index score (UIS), pain index score (PIS), general health (GH), quality of work (QW), and quality of sex (QS).

Conclusions: Despite various attempts to establish the best ureteral stent, the effect of double-j stent physical features on stent-related symptoms remained unknown. No verdict is conceivable without adequate empirical data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输尿管支架相关症状:比较研究。
背景:在泌尿外科,输尿管支架用于治疗梗阻性疾病。血尿(54%)、发热、不适和下泌尿系统症状是与输尿管支架相关的主要症状。目的:本文将支架症状与双j宽度和长度以及患者的身高、体重和体重指数(BMI)联系起来。输尿管支架症状问卷(USSQ)用于测量支架原位第1周、第4周以及拆除尾纤后第4周的输尿管支架症状:这是一项对 200 名患者进行的前瞻性研究,根据输尿管支架的特性,将患者分为四组。这些组别分别是4.8 Fr./26 cm(A 组)、4.8 Fr./28 cm(B 组)、6 Fr/26 cm(C 组)和 6 Fr/28 cm(D 组):结果:在 200 名患者中,男性占 53.5%。参与者的平均年龄为 49 ± 15.5 岁,身高为 175 ± 8.94 厘米,体重指数为 23.8 ± 7.6 厘米。各组的化验结果相同。在第一周和第四周,各组的尿液症状、疼痛严重程度、健康状况和职业活动相似。疼痛部位的差异具有统计学意义。第一周,A 组有 82.4% 的人出现肾性背痛,而 B 组为 68.8%,C 组为 31.3%,D 组为 62.5(P = 0.04)。第四周时,64.7% 的 A 组患者报告肾前部疼痛,而 B 组为 100%,C 组为 93.3%,D 组为 100%(P = 0.04)。患者的性活动具有统计学意义。C 组 24.4% 的患者在支架安装前停止了性活动,而其他组分别为 10.6%、8.3% 和 6.4%(P = 0.03)。中等比例的患者在第 4 周有活跃的性活动(A 组:7.8%;B 组:5.8%;C 组:8.2%;D 组:4.1%),P = 0.83。在多变量分析中,导尿管组别、年龄、体重、身高和体重指数对尿液指数评分(UIS)、疼痛指数评分(PIS)、总体健康状况(GH)、工作质量(QW)和性生活质量(QS)没有显著影响:结论:尽管在确定最佳输尿管支架方面进行了各种尝试,但双重支架的物理特征对支架相关症状的影响仍是未知数。如果没有足够的经验数据,就无法下定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Bottoms-up" minimally-invasive approach to inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer management. A single-center comparative study versus open approach and review. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short- and long-term complications of early versus delayed penile prosthesis implantation in patients with ischemic priapism. Adverse events related to laser fibers and laser machines during ureteroscopy and stone lithotripsy: Insights from an updated 10-year analysis of the US MAUDE database. Can serum 17-hydroxy progesterone predict an improvement in semen parameters following micro-varicocelectomy? A prospective study. CFTR Exon 10 deleterious mutations in patients with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens in a cohort of Pakistani patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1