High-volume prostate biopsy core involvement is not associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence following 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy monotherapy.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1186/s13014-023-02397-z
Jonathan W Lischalk, Astrid Sanchez, Vianca F Santos, Christopher Mendez, Meredith Akerman, Todd Carpenter, Moses Tam, David Byun, David R Wise, Anand Mahadevan, Andrew Evans, William Huang, Aaron Katz, Herbert Lepor, Jonathan A Haas
{"title":"High-volume prostate biopsy core involvement is not associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence following 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy monotherapy.","authors":"Jonathan W Lischalk, Astrid Sanchez, Vianca F Santos, Christopher Mendez, Meredith Akerman, Todd Carpenter, Moses Tam, David Byun, David R Wise, Anand Mahadevan, Andrew Evans, William Huang, Aaron Katz, Herbert Lepor, Jonathan A Haas","doi":"10.1186/s13014-023-02397-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Percentage of positive cores involved on a systemic prostate biopsy has been established as a risk factor for adverse oncologic outcomes and is a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) independent parameter for unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Most data from a radiation standpoint was published in an era of conventional fractionation. We explore whether the higher biological dose delivered with SBRT can mitigate this risk factor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large single institutional database was interrogated to identify all patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with 5-fraction SBRT without ADT. Pathology results were reviewed to determine detailed core involvement as well as Gleason score (GS). High-volume biopsy core involvement was defined as ≥ 50%. Weighted Gleason core involvement was reviewed, giving higher weight to higher-grade cancer. The PSA kinetics and oncologic outcomes were analyzed for association with core involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2009 to 2018, 1590 patients were identified who underwent SBRT for localized PCa. High-volume core involvement was a relatively rare event observed in 19% of our cohort, which was observed more in patients with small prostates (p < 0.0001) and/or intermediate-risk disease (p = 0.005). Higher PSA nadir was observed in those patients with low-volume core involvement within the intermediate-risk cohort (p = 0.004), which was confirmed when core involvement was analyzed as a continuous variable weighted by Gleason score (p = 0.049). High-volume core involvement was not associated with biochemical progression (p = 0.234).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a median follow-up of over 4 years, biochemical progression was not associated with pretreatment high-volume core involvement for patients treated with 5-fraction SBRT alone. In the era of prostate SBRT and MRI-directed prostate biopsies, the use of high-volume core involvement as an independent predictor of unfavorable intermediate risk disease should be revisited.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02397-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Percentage of positive cores involved on a systemic prostate biopsy has been established as a risk factor for adverse oncologic outcomes and is a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) independent parameter for unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Most data from a radiation standpoint was published in an era of conventional fractionation. We explore whether the higher biological dose delivered with SBRT can mitigate this risk factor.

Methods: A large single institutional database was interrogated to identify all patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with 5-fraction SBRT without ADT. Pathology results were reviewed to determine detailed core involvement as well as Gleason score (GS). High-volume biopsy core involvement was defined as ≥ 50%. Weighted Gleason core involvement was reviewed, giving higher weight to higher-grade cancer. The PSA kinetics and oncologic outcomes were analyzed for association with core involvement.

Results: From 2009 to 2018, 1590 patients were identified who underwent SBRT for localized PCa. High-volume core involvement was a relatively rare event observed in 19% of our cohort, which was observed more in patients with small prostates (p < 0.0001) and/or intermediate-risk disease (p = 0.005). Higher PSA nadir was observed in those patients with low-volume core involvement within the intermediate-risk cohort (p = 0.004), which was confirmed when core involvement was analyzed as a continuous variable weighted by Gleason score (p = 0.049). High-volume core involvement was not associated with biochemical progression (p = 0.234).

Conclusions: With a median follow-up of over 4 years, biochemical progression was not associated with pretreatment high-volume core involvement for patients treated with 5-fraction SBRT alone. In the era of prostate SBRT and MRI-directed prostate biopsies, the use of high-volume core involvement as an independent predictor of unfavorable intermediate risk disease should be revisited.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高体积前列腺活检核心受累与5分次立体定向体放射单体疗法后癌症复发风险增加无关。
目的:系统性前列腺活检中阳性核的百分比已被确定为不良肿瘤结果的风险因素,也是美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)对不利中危疾病的独立参数。从放射角度来看,大多数数据都是在传统分型时代发表的。我们探讨了SBRT提供的更高生物剂量是否能减轻这一风险因素:方法:我们查询了一个大型单一机构数据库,以确定所有确诊为局部前列腺癌(PCa)的患者,这些患者均接受了不含 ADT 的 5 分段 SBRT 治疗。对病理结果进行审查,以确定详细的核心受累情况以及格里森评分(GS)。高体积活检核心受累定义为≥50%。对 Gleason 核心受累情况进行了加权审查,对等级较高的癌症给予更高的权重。分析了PSA动力学和肿瘤学结果与核心受累的关系:从2009年到2018年,共有1590名患者接受了SBRT治疗局部PCa。在我们的队列中,高体积核心受累是一个相对罕见的事件,在19%的患者中观察到,这在前列腺较小的患者中观察到得更多(P 结论:前列腺较小的患者中观察到的高体积核心受累相对较少:中位随访时间超过 4 年,对于仅接受 5 分 SBRT 治疗的患者,生化进展与治疗前高体积核心受累无关。在前列腺 SBRT 和 MRI 引导的前列腺活检时代,应重新审视将高体积核心受累作为不利的中危疾病独立预测指标的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of Biology-guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) Targeting Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avid liver metastases Secondary solid malignancies in long-term survivors after total body irradiation Study protocol: Optimising patient positioning for the planning of accelerated partial breast radiotherapy for the integrated magnetic resonance linear accelerator: OPRAH MRL The significance of risk stratification through nomogram-based assessment in determining postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients diagnosed with pT1 − 2N1M0 breast cancer Spatially fractionated GRID radiation potentiates immune-mediated tumor control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1