Clopidogrel versus newer P2Y12 inhibitors in the dual antiplatelet therapy for stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1177/15910199241236821
Sávio Batista, Raphael Camerotte, Agostinho C Pinheiro, Igor Costermani, Anthony Bishay, José Alberto Almeida Filho, Lucca B Palavani, Edmundo Damiani Bertoli, Raphael Bertani, Jason A Ellis, Yafell Serulle, Christian Ferreira
{"title":"Clopidogrel versus newer P2Y12 inhibitors in the dual antiplatelet therapy for stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Sávio Batista, Raphael Camerotte, Agostinho C Pinheiro, Igor Costermani, Anthony Bishay, José Alberto Almeida Filho, Lucca B Palavani, Edmundo Damiani Bertoli, Raphael Bertani, Jason A Ellis, Yafell Serulle, Christian Ferreira","doi":"10.1177/15910199241236821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) for cerebral aneurysms requires dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), commonly clopidogrel plus aspirin is preferable to ticagrelor or prasugrel plus aspirin. However, there are few studies assessing the safety of the association of ticagrelor or prasugrel plus aspirin.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare the safety of newer P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel in patients that underwent a SACE for cerebral aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we searched PubMed and Embase for studies comparing newer P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel in patients undergoing DAPT for SACE. Outcomes were total number of complications, number of hemorrhagic complications, and number of thromboembolic complications both intraoperative and follow-up. A random effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1026 patients from six studies. Newer P2Y12 inhibitors were used in 562 (54,77%) patients. There were no significant differences between groups in total number of complications (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.32, 1.99; <i>p</i> < 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 78%), in intraoperative hemorrhagic complications (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.09, 4.71; <i>p</i> = 0.68; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), follow-up hemorrhagic complications (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.70, 2.15; <i>p</i> = 0.49; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), intraoperative thromboembolic complications (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.14, 1.35; <i>p</i> = 0.25; I<sup>2</sup> = 24%), and in follow-up thromboembolic complications (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.33, 2.39; <i>p</i> = 0.03; I<sup>2</sup> = 59%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients who underwent a SACE, newer P2Y12 inhibitors showed no differences in intraoperative and follow-up complications compared with clopidogrel.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241236821"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241236821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) for cerebral aneurysms requires dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), commonly clopidogrel plus aspirin is preferable to ticagrelor or prasugrel plus aspirin. However, there are few studies assessing the safety of the association of ticagrelor or prasugrel plus aspirin.

Objectives: Compare the safety of newer P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel in patients that underwent a SACE for cerebral aneurysms.

Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we searched PubMed and Embase for studies comparing newer P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel in patients undergoing DAPT for SACE. Outcomes were total number of complications, number of hemorrhagic complications, and number of thromboembolic complications both intraoperative and follow-up. A random effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: We included 1026 patients from six studies. Newer P2Y12 inhibitors were used in 562 (54,77%) patients. There were no significant differences between groups in total number of complications (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.32, 1.99; p < 0.01; I2 = 78%), in intraoperative hemorrhagic complications (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.09, 4.71; p = 0.68; I2 = 0%), follow-up hemorrhagic complications (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.70, 2.15; p = 0.49; I2 = 0%), intraoperative thromboembolic complications (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.14, 1.35; p = 0.25; I2 = 24%), and in follow-up thromboembolic complications (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.33, 2.39; p = 0.03; I2 = 59%).

Conclusion: In patients who underwent a SACE, newer P2Y12 inhibitors showed no differences in intraoperative and follow-up complications compared with clopidogrel.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在支架辅助线圈栓塞颅内动脉瘤的双重抗血小板疗法中,氯吡格雷与新型 P2Y12 抑制剂的比较:荟萃分析。
导言:脑动脉瘤支架辅助线圈栓塞术(SACE)需要双联抗血小板疗法(DAPT),通常氯吡格雷加阿司匹林优于替卡格雷或普拉格雷加阿司匹林。然而,很少有研究评估替卡格雷或普拉格雷联合阿司匹林的安全性:比较新型 P2Y12 抑制剂与氯吡格雷在因脑动脉瘤接受 SACE 患者中的安全性:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,我们在PubMed和Embase上搜索了在接受DAPT治疗的SACE患者中比较新型P2Y12抑制剂和氯吡格雷的研究。研究结果包括术中和随访并发症总数、出血并发症总数以及血栓栓塞并发症总数。采用随机效应模型计算几率比(ORs)及95%置信区间(CIs):结果:我们纳入了六项研究中的 1026 例患者。562例(54.77%)患者使用了较新的P2Y12抑制剂。在并发症总数(OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.32, 1.99; p 2 = 78%)、术中出血并发症(OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.09, 4.71; p = 0.68; I2 = 0%)、随访出血并发症(OR 1.23;95% CI 0.70,2.15;P = 0.49;I2 = 0%)、术中血栓栓塞并发症(OR 0.43;95% CI 0.14,1.35;P = 0.25;I2 = 24%)和随访血栓栓塞并发症(OR 0.89;95% CI 0.33,2.39;P = 0.03;I2 = 59%):结论:在接受 SACE 的患者中,较新的 P2Y12 抑制剂与氯吡格雷相比,在术中和随访并发症方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Circulating miRNA profiles as predictive biomarkers for aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment: a prospective study. "Chopperlysis": The effect of helicopter transport on reperfusion and outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes. DWI lesions after intracranial aneurysm treatment with contour or WEB-does the device matter? Analysis of selective neurocritical care admission costs following elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Recognition of dural to pial supply in high-grade dural arteriovenous fistula: A technical note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1