A comprehensive analysis of well-being frameworks applied in Australia and their suitability for Indigenous peoples.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1080/17482631.2024.2321646
Kamaljit K Sangha, Yonatan Dinku, Robert Costanza, Anne Poelina
{"title":"A comprehensive analysis of well-being frameworks applied in Australia and their suitability for Indigenous peoples.","authors":"Kamaljit K Sangha, Yonatan Dinku, Robert Costanza, Anne Poelina","doi":"10.1080/17482631.2024.2321646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Well-being is a complex, multi-dimensional, dynamic, and evolving concept, covering social, economic, health, cultural and spiritual dimensions of human living, and often used synonymously with happiness, life satisfaction, prosperity, and quality of life. We review the existing key wellbeing frameworks applied in Australia both for the wider public and Indigenous peoples. The aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of various applied frameworks, along with a critical analysis of domains or dimensions comprising those frameworks, and to analyse the role of nature in those frameworks.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We conducted a critical analysis of the main frameworks applied in Australia to date to measure the well-being of the mainstream (mainly non-Indigenous) and Indigenous populations. This study is particularly timely given the Australian Government's interest in revising the well-being frameworks as mentioned in the Government \"Measuring What Matters\" statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The existing well-being frameworks in Australia either overlook or hardly consider the role of nature and its services which are important to support human well-being. Likewise, for Indigenous peoples \"<i>Country\"</i> (Indigenous clan land) is vital for their well-being as their living is imbued with \"Country\". The role of nature/\"Country\" needs to be considered in revising the well-being frameworks, indicators and measures to inform and develop appropriate policies and programs in Australia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To develop appropriate welfare policies and programs for achieving socio-economic and other wellbeing outcomes, it is essential to evolve and conceptualize wellbeing frameworks (and related indicators and measures) in line with people's contemporary values, particularly considering the role of nature and its services.</p>","PeriodicalId":51468,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","volume":"19 1","pages":"2321646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2024.2321646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Well-being is a complex, multi-dimensional, dynamic, and evolving concept, covering social, economic, health, cultural and spiritual dimensions of human living, and often used synonymously with happiness, life satisfaction, prosperity, and quality of life. We review the existing key wellbeing frameworks applied in Australia both for the wider public and Indigenous peoples. The aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of various applied frameworks, along with a critical analysis of domains or dimensions comprising those frameworks, and to analyse the role of nature in those frameworks.

Methodology: We conducted a critical analysis of the main frameworks applied in Australia to date to measure the well-being of the mainstream (mainly non-Indigenous) and Indigenous populations. This study is particularly timely given the Australian Government's interest in revising the well-being frameworks as mentioned in the Government "Measuring What Matters" statement.

Results: The existing well-being frameworks in Australia either overlook or hardly consider the role of nature and its services which are important to support human well-being. Likewise, for Indigenous peoples "Country" (Indigenous clan land) is vital for their well-being as their living is imbued with "Country". The role of nature/"Country" needs to be considered in revising the well-being frameworks, indicators and measures to inform and develop appropriate policies and programs in Australia.

Conclusion: To develop appropriate welfare policies and programs for achieving socio-economic and other wellbeing outcomes, it is essential to evolve and conceptualize wellbeing frameworks (and related indicators and measures) in line with people's contemporary values, particularly considering the role of nature and its services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全面分析澳大利亚采用的福祉框架及其对土著人民的适用性。
目的:幸福是一个复杂、多维、动态和不断发展的概念,涵盖人类生活的社会、经济、健康、文化和精神层面,通常与幸福、生活满意度、繁荣和生活质量同义。我们回顾了澳大利亚适用于广大公众和土著居民的现有主要福祉框架。目的是对各种应用框架进行全面概述,同时对构成这些框架的领域或维度进行批判性分析,并分析自然在这些框架中的作用:我们对迄今为止澳大利亚用于衡量主流人口(主要是非土著居民)和土著居民福祉的主要框架进行了批判性分析。澳大利亚政府在 "衡量重要因素 "的政府声明中提到,澳大利亚政府有意修订福祉框架,因此这项研究尤为及时:结果:澳大利亚现有的福祉框架忽视或几乎不考虑自然及其服务的作用,而自然及其服务对支持人类福祉非常重要。同样,对土著人来说,"国家"(土著氏族土地)对他们的福祉至关重要,因为他们的生活与 "国家 "息息相关。在修订澳大利亚的福利框架、指标和措施时,需要考虑自然/"国家 "的作用,以便为制定适当的政策和计划提供信息:为了制定适当的福利政策和计划以实现社会经济和其他福利成果,必须根据人们的当代价值观来发展和构思福利框架(以及相关指标和措施),特别是要考虑到自然及其服务的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being acknowledges the international and interdisciplinary nature of health-related issues. It intends to provide a meeting-point for studies using rigorous qualitative methodology of significance for issues related to human health and well-being. The aim of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being is to support and to shape the emerging field of qualitative studies and to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of human health and well-being.
期刊最新文献
"It takes a lot of sisu to get through it"- managerial experiences of facing adversities during pandemic. A qualitative study on the caregiver burden experience in home reflux enema management of infants with congenital megacolon. Exploring the experiences of female undergraduate nursing students in providing home healthcare to older adults. Lost and changed meaning in life of people with Long Covid: a qualitative study. Perceptions of healthcare providers on benefits, risks and barriers regarding intradialytic exercise among haemodialysis patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1