Juan C Maass, Alexis Leiva, Mariela Torrente, Rodrigo Vergara, Chama Belkhiria, Carolina Delgado, Paul H Delano
{"title":"Supra-Threshold LS CE-Chirp Auditory Brainstem Response in the Elderly.","authors":"Juan C Maass, Alexis Leiva, Mariela Torrente, Rodrigo Vergara, Chama Belkhiria, Carolina Delgado, Paul H Delano","doi":"10.1159/000533683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aging deteriorates peripheral and central auditory structures and functions. In elders, for an accurate audiological evaluation, it is important to explore beyond the cochlear receptor. Audiograms provide an estimation of hearing thresholds, while the amplitudes and latencies of supra-threshold auditory brainstem response (ABR) can offer noninvasive measures of the auditory pathways functioning. Regarding ABR, in young populations, level-specific chirp (LS CE-chirp) stimulus has been proposed as an alternative synchronizing method to obtain larger ABR responses than those evoked by clicks. However, the supra-threshold characteristics of chirp evoked ABR, and their association to hearing thresholds is relatively unknown in the elderly. The aim of this study was to evaluate supra-threshold LS CE-chirp ABRs in an aged population by comparing their features with click ABRs, and evaluating their relationship with audiometric hearing thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a cross-sectional study to characterize the hearing of 125 adults aged over 65 years. We determined the audiometric hearing thresholds and supra-threshold ABRs elicited by LS CE-chirp and click stimuli at 80 dB nHL. We evaluated associations by means of partial correlations and covariate adjustment. We performed specific frequencies' analysis and subgroup analysis per hearing level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wave V responses had significantly shorter latencies and larger amplitudes when elicited by LS CE-chirp as compared to click-evoked responses. Audiometric hearing thresholds correlated with age, but ABR characteristics did not. We found mild correlations between hearing thresholds and ABR characteristics, predominantly at higher frequencies and with chirp. We found scarce evidence of correlation between ABR characteristics and the average of behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.5 to 4 kHz (0.5-4 kHz PTA). After subgroup analysis according to the hearing level, no stronger or more significant correlations were found between ABR characteristics and 0.5-4 kHz PTA.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study, we found that supra-threshold LS CE-chirp ABR presented some of the previously described similitudes and differences with supra-threshold click ABR in younger populations. Although, the average amplitude and latency of wave V evoked by LS CE-chirp were larger and faster than those evoked by clicks, these results should be taken with caution at the individual level, and further studies are required to state that LS CE-chirp ABRs are better than click ABRs in elders for clinical evaluations. We did not find consistent associations between hearing thresholds and supra-threshold wave V features, suggesting that these measures should be considered independently in the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Aging deteriorates peripheral and central auditory structures and functions. In elders, for an accurate audiological evaluation, it is important to explore beyond the cochlear receptor. Audiograms provide an estimation of hearing thresholds, while the amplitudes and latencies of supra-threshold auditory brainstem response (ABR) can offer noninvasive measures of the auditory pathways functioning. Regarding ABR, in young populations, level-specific chirp (LS CE-chirp) stimulus has been proposed as an alternative synchronizing method to obtain larger ABR responses than those evoked by clicks. However, the supra-threshold characteristics of chirp evoked ABR, and their association to hearing thresholds is relatively unknown in the elderly. The aim of this study was to evaluate supra-threshold LS CE-chirp ABRs in an aged population by comparing their features with click ABRs, and evaluating their relationship with audiometric hearing thresholds.
Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study to characterize the hearing of 125 adults aged over 65 years. We determined the audiometric hearing thresholds and supra-threshold ABRs elicited by LS CE-chirp and click stimuli at 80 dB nHL. We evaluated associations by means of partial correlations and covariate adjustment. We performed specific frequencies' analysis and subgroup analysis per hearing level.
Results: Wave V responses had significantly shorter latencies and larger amplitudes when elicited by LS CE-chirp as compared to click-evoked responses. Audiometric hearing thresholds correlated with age, but ABR characteristics did not. We found mild correlations between hearing thresholds and ABR characteristics, predominantly at higher frequencies and with chirp. We found scarce evidence of correlation between ABR characteristics and the average of behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.5 to 4 kHz (0.5-4 kHz PTA). After subgroup analysis according to the hearing level, no stronger or more significant correlations were found between ABR characteristics and 0.5-4 kHz PTA.
Discussion: In this study, we found that supra-threshold LS CE-chirp ABR presented some of the previously described similitudes and differences with supra-threshold click ABR in younger populations. Although, the average amplitude and latency of wave V evoked by LS CE-chirp were larger and faster than those evoked by clicks, these results should be taken with caution at the individual level, and further studies are required to state that LS CE-chirp ABRs are better than click ABRs in elders for clinical evaluations. We did not find consistent associations between hearing thresholds and supra-threshold wave V features, suggesting that these measures should be considered independently in the elderly.
导言衰老会导致外周和中枢听觉结构和功能退化。要对老年人进行准确的听力评估,必须对耳蜗受体以外的部位进行探查。听力图可估测听阈,而阈上听性脑干反应(ABR)的振幅和潜伏期可提供听觉通路功能的非侵入性测量。关于听觉脑干反应,在年轻人群中,人们提出了水平特异性啁啾(LS CE-chirp)刺激作为另一种同步方法,以获得比点击所诱发的更大的听觉脑干反应。然而,在老年人中,啁啾声诱发的 ABR 的阈上特征及其与听阈的关联还相对未知。本研究旨在通过比较阈上LS CE-啁啾ABR与点击ABR的特征,评估老年人群中阈上LS CE-啁啾ABR与听力测定听阈的关系:我们对 125 名 65 岁以上成年人的听力进行了横断面研究。我们测定了在 80 dB nHL 下由 LS CE chirp 和单击刺激引起的听阈和阈上 ABR。我们通过局部相关性和协变量调整来评估相关性。我们按听力水平进行了特定频率分析和亚组分析:结果:与点击诱发的反应相比,LS CE啁啾声诱发的V波反应的潜伏期明显更短,振幅明显更大。听力测定的听阈与年龄相关,但 ABR 特征与年龄无关。我们发现听阈和 ABR 特征之间存在轻微的相关性,主要是在较高频率和鸣叫时。我们几乎没有发现 ABR 特征与 0.5 至 4 kHz 行为听阈平均值(0.5-4 kHz PTA)之间存在相关性。根据听力水平进行分组分析后,没有发现 ABR 特征与 0.5-4 kHz PTA 之间有更强或更显著的相关性:在这项研究中,我们发现阈上 LS CE chirp ABR 与之前描述的阈上点击 ABR 在年轻人群中有一些相似之处和不同之处。虽然 LS CE-啁啾诱发的波 V 的平均振幅和潜伏期比点击诱发的更大更快,但在个体水平上,这些结果应谨慎对待,而且还需要进一步的研究来证明 LS CE-啁啾 ABR 比点击 ABR 更适合用于老年人的临床评估。我们没有发现听阈与阈上波 V 特征之间存在一致的关联,这表明在老年人中应单独考虑这些测量指标。
期刊介绍:
''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.