A Cytotoxicity Assay as an Alternative to the Murine Model for the Potency Testing of Bothrops jararaca Venom and Antivenom: An Intralaboratory Pre-validation Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1177/02611929241237518
Renata N C Nundes, Antonio E C C Almeida, Wlamir C Moura, Marcelo S Gonzalez, Humberto P Araújo
{"title":"A Cytotoxicity Assay as an Alternative to the Murine Model for the Potency Testing of <i>Bothrops jararaca</i> Venom and Antivenom: An Intralaboratory Pre-validation Study.","authors":"Renata N C Nundes, Antonio E C C Almeida, Wlamir C Moura, Marcelo S Gonzalez, Humberto P Araújo","doi":"10.1177/02611929241237518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antivenom therapy is the only specific treatment for snakebite envenomation, and antivenom potency determination is key in the efficacy assurance quality control process. Nowadays, this process relies on the <i>in vivo</i> murine model - thus, the development of alternative <i>in vitro</i> methods is imperative. In the current study, the principle of the proposed method is the ability of <i>Bothrops</i> venom to induce cytotoxic effects in Vero cells, and the capacity to evaluate the inhibition of this cytotoxicity by the respective antivenom. After exposure to the venom/antivenom, the relative proportions of adherent (viable) cells were evaluated by direct staining with Coomassie Blue. The optical density (OD) of the lysed cell eluate was directly proportional to the number of adherent cells. This cytotoxicity-based alternative method could represent a potential candidate for validation as a replacement for the current <i>in vivo</i> test. The <i>in vitro</i>-determined cytotoxicity of the Brazilian <i>Bothrops</i> reference venom (expressed as the 50% effective concentration; EC<sub>50</sub>) was 3.61 μg/ml; the <i>in vitro</i>-determined 50% inhibitory concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>) of the Brazilian <i>Bothrops</i> reference antivenom was 0.133 μl/ml. From these two values, it was possible to calculate the potency of the reference antivenom. The results from the assays exhibited a good linear response, indicating that the method could be a potential candidate replacement method for use in antivenom quality control prior to lot release, subject to further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55577,"journal":{"name":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929241237518","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antivenom therapy is the only specific treatment for snakebite envenomation, and antivenom potency determination is key in the efficacy assurance quality control process. Nowadays, this process relies on the in vivo murine model - thus, the development of alternative in vitro methods is imperative. In the current study, the principle of the proposed method is the ability of Bothrops venom to induce cytotoxic effects in Vero cells, and the capacity to evaluate the inhibition of this cytotoxicity by the respective antivenom. After exposure to the venom/antivenom, the relative proportions of adherent (viable) cells were evaluated by direct staining with Coomassie Blue. The optical density (OD) of the lysed cell eluate was directly proportional to the number of adherent cells. This cytotoxicity-based alternative method could represent a potential candidate for validation as a replacement for the current in vivo test. The in vitro-determined cytotoxicity of the Brazilian Bothrops reference venom (expressed as the 50% effective concentration; EC50) was 3.61 μg/ml; the in vitro-determined 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of the Brazilian Bothrops reference antivenom was 0.133 μl/ml. From these two values, it was possible to calculate the potency of the reference antivenom. The results from the assays exhibited a good linear response, indicating that the method could be a potential candidate replacement method for use in antivenom quality control prior to lot release, subject to further validation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细胞毒性测定法可替代小鼠模型,用于箭毒双蛛毒液和抗蛇毒血清的效力测试:实验室内预验证研究》。
抗蛇毒血清疗法是治疗蛇咬伤的唯一特效疗法,而抗蛇毒血清效价测定是疗效保证质量控制过程中的关键。目前,这一过程依赖于体内小鼠模型--因此,开发其他体外方法势在必行。在目前的研究中,拟议方法的原理是双钩蛇毒在 Vero 细胞中诱导细胞毒性效应的能力,以及评估相应抗蛇毒血清抑制这种细胞毒性的能力。暴露于毒液/抗蛇毒血清后,用柯马西蓝直接染色,评估附着(存活)细胞的相对比例。裂解细胞洗脱液的光密度(OD)与附着细胞的数量成正比。这种以细胞毒性为基础的替代方法有可能替代目前的体内测试方法。体外测定的巴西两栖动物参考毒液的细胞毒性(以50%有效浓度表示;EC50)为3.61微克/毫升;体外测定的巴西两栖动物参考抗蛇毒血清的50%抑制浓度(IC50)为0.133微升/毫升。根据这两个数值可以计算出参考抗蛇毒血清的效力。检测结果显示出良好的线性响应,表明该方法可作为一种潜在的替代方法,用于抗蛇毒血清批量发布前的质量控制,但尚需进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ATLA) is a peer-reviewed journal, intended to cover all aspects of the development, validation, implementation and use of alternatives to laboratory animals in biomedical research and toxicity testing. In addition to the replacement of animals, it also covers work that aims to reduce the number of animals used and refine the in vivo experiments that are still carried out.
期刊最新文献
Introducing the COST Action 'Improving the Quality of Biomedical Science with 3Rs Concepts' (IMPROVE). Journeying Through Journals: The Publishing Process and How to Maximise Research Impact. Progress and Remaining Opportunities to Increase the Use of Animal-free Antibodies in the USA. Editorial. An Evaluation of the Replacement of Animal-derived Biomaterials in Human Primary Cell Culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1