Research gaps and future needs for allergen prediction in food safety.

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2024-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2024.1297547
A Fernandez, E Danisman, M Taheri Boroujerdi, S Kazemi, F J Moreno, M M Epstein
{"title":"Research gaps and future needs for allergen prediction in food safety.","authors":"A Fernandez, E Danisman, M Taheri Boroujerdi, S Kazemi, F J Moreno, M M Epstein","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2024.1297547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The allergenicity and protein risk assessments in food safety are facing new challenges. Demands for healthier and more sustainable food systems have led to significant advances in biotechnology, the development of more complex foods, and the search for alternative protein sources. All this has increased the pressure on the safety assessment prediction approaches anchored into requirements defined in the late 90's. In 2022, the EFSA's Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms published a scientific opinion focusing on the developments needed for allergenicity and protein safety assessments of new products derived from biotechnology. Here, we further elaborate on the main elements described in this scientific opinion and prioritize those development needs requiring critical attention. The starting point of any new recommendation would require a focus on clinical relevance and the development of a fit-for-purpose database targeted for specific risk assessment goals. Furthermore, it is imperative to review and clarify the main purpose of the allergenicity risk assessment. An internationally agreed consensus on the overall purpose of allergenicity risk assessment will accelerate the development of fit-for-purpose methodologies, where the role of exposure should be better clarified. Considering the experience gained over the last 25 years and recent scientific developments in the fields of biotechnology, allergy, and risk assessment, it is time to revise and improve the allergenicity safety assessment to ensure the reliability of allergenicity assessments for food of the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2024.1297547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The allergenicity and protein risk assessments in food safety are facing new challenges. Demands for healthier and more sustainable food systems have led to significant advances in biotechnology, the development of more complex foods, and the search for alternative protein sources. All this has increased the pressure on the safety assessment prediction approaches anchored into requirements defined in the late 90's. In 2022, the EFSA's Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms published a scientific opinion focusing on the developments needed for allergenicity and protein safety assessments of new products derived from biotechnology. Here, we further elaborate on the main elements described in this scientific opinion and prioritize those development needs requiring critical attention. The starting point of any new recommendation would require a focus on clinical relevance and the development of a fit-for-purpose database targeted for specific risk assessment goals. Furthermore, it is imperative to review and clarify the main purpose of the allergenicity risk assessment. An internationally agreed consensus on the overall purpose of allergenicity risk assessment will accelerate the development of fit-for-purpose methodologies, where the role of exposure should be better clarified. Considering the experience gained over the last 25 years and recent scientific developments in the fields of biotechnology, allergy, and risk assessment, it is time to revise and improve the allergenicity safety assessment to ensure the reliability of allergenicity assessments for food of the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食品安全中过敏原预测的研究空白和未来需求。
食品安全中的过敏性和蛋白质风险评估正面临着新的挑战。对更健康、更可持续的食品体系的需求导致了生物技术的显著进步、更复杂食品的开发以及替代蛋白质来源的寻找。所有这一切都增加了对安全评估预测方法的压力,而这种方法是根据 90 年代末确定的要求制定的。2022 年,欧洲食品安全局转基因生物专家组发表了一份科学意见,重点关注生物技术新产品过敏性和蛋白质安全性评估所需的发展。在此,我们将进一步阐述该科学意见中描述的主要内容,并优先考虑需要重点关注的发展需求。任何新建议的出发点都需要关注临床相关性,并针对特定风险评估目标开发适用的数据库。此外,必须审查和明确过敏性风险评估的主要目的。国际社会就过敏性风险评估的总体目的达成共识,将加快开发适合目的的方法,其中应更好地明确暴露的作用。考虑到过去 25 年取得的经验以及生物技术、过敏症和风险评估领域的最新科学发展,现在是修订和改进过敏性安全评估的时候了,以确保未来食品过敏性评估的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Multidisciplinary management of a patient with indolent systemic mastocytosis and refractory symptoms. Diagnosis and management of shrimp allergy. When allergies have no name: is idiopathic anaphylaxis driven by co-factors? Allergenic protein-induced type I hypersensitivity models: a review. Key differences between chronic inducible and spontaneous urticaria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1