The Effect of a Repeated Standardized Patient-Based End-of-Life Care Training Program on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Emotions Toward End-of-Life Patients.

Betül Çakmak, Bahar Inkaya
{"title":"The Effect of a Repeated Standardized Patient-Based End-of-Life Care Training Program on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Emotions Toward End-of-Life Patients.","authors":"Betül Çakmak, Bahar Inkaya","doi":"10.1177/10499091241236921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sufficient knowledge of end-of-life care, positive attitudes, and emotions regarding death and dying are essential criteria for showcasing favorable palliative care educational results to undergraduate nursing students. However, nursing students have negative attitudes toward end-of-life care and know little about it.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to examine the effect of a repeated standardized patient-based training program (intervention) on nursing students' knowledge, attitudes, and emotions about end-of-life patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study adopted a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental research design. The sample consisted of 50 fourth-year nursing students divided into intervention (n = 25) and control (n = 25) groups. All participants attended the intervention. The intervention group attended the intervention twice, while the control group attended it only once. Data were collected using a personal information form, the Frommelt Attitudes Toward Care of the Dying Scale, the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, and the End-of-Life Care Nursing Questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's Chi-square test, dependent groups <i>t</i> test, Pearson-Spearman, Mann-Whitney test, Wilcoxon test, and Friedman test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention helped participants learn more about end-of-life care (χ2 = 27.167, <i>P</i> = .000; F = 42.725, <i>P</i> = .000) and develop more positive attitudes toward end-of-life patients (F = 13.279, <i>P</i> = .000; F = 6.934, <i>P</i> = .000). The intervention also helped participants develop communication skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Universities should integrate repeated standardized patient-based into nursing curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"64-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241236921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sufficient knowledge of end-of-life care, positive attitudes, and emotions regarding death and dying are essential criteria for showcasing favorable palliative care educational results to undergraduate nursing students. However, nursing students have negative attitudes toward end-of-life care and know little about it.

Aim: This study aimed to examine the effect of a repeated standardized patient-based training program (intervention) on nursing students' knowledge, attitudes, and emotions about end-of-life patients.

Method: This study adopted a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental research design. The sample consisted of 50 fourth-year nursing students divided into intervention (n = 25) and control (n = 25) groups. All participants attended the intervention. The intervention group attended the intervention twice, while the control group attended it only once. Data were collected using a personal information form, the Frommelt Attitudes Toward Care of the Dying Scale, the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, and the End-of-Life Care Nursing Questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's Chi-square test, dependent groups t test, Pearson-Spearman, Mann-Whitney test, Wilcoxon test, and Friedman test.

Results: The intervention helped participants learn more about end-of-life care (χ2 = 27.167, P = .000; F = 42.725, P = .000) and develop more positive attitudes toward end-of-life patients (F = 13.279, P = .000; F = 6.934, P = .000). The intervention also helped participants develop communication skills.

Conclusion: Universities should integrate repeated standardized patient-based into nursing curricula.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于患者的临终关怀重复标准化培训项目对护理专业学生对待临终患者的知识、态度和情感的影响。
背景:充足的临终关怀知识、积极的态度以及对死亡和濒死的情感是向护理本科生展示良好姑息关怀教育成果的基本标准。目的:本研究旨在探讨基于患者的重复标准化培训项目(干预)对护理专业学生有关临终病人的知识、态度和情感的影响:本研究采用了前测-后测的准实验研究设计。样本由 50 名四年级护生组成,分为干预组(25 人)和对照组(25 人)。所有参与者都参加了干预。干预组参加了两次干预,而对照组只参加了一次。使用个人信息表、Frommelt临终关怀态度量表、积极和消极情绪表以及临终关怀护理问卷收集数据。数据分析采用了描述性统计、皮尔逊卡方检验、因果组 t 检验、皮尔逊-斯皮尔曼检验、曼-惠特尼检验、Wilcoxon 检验和 Friedman 检验:干预有助于参与者了解更多临终关怀知识(χ2 = 27.167,P = .000;F = 42.725,P = .000),并对临终患者形成更积极的态度(F = 13.279,P = .000;F = 6.934,P = .000)。干预还有助于参与者发展沟通技巧:结论:大学应在护理课程中加入重复标准化病人的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge and Attitude of the General Public Toward Palliative Care in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Differences in Attitudes and Barriers Towards Advance Care Planning Amongst Ischemic Heart Disease Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization. Palliative and End-of-Life Care Interventions with Minoritized Populations in the US with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review. Exploring Palliative Care Needs Among Patients With Cancer and Non-Cancer Serious Chronic Diseases: A Comparison Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1