Chewing Disability Is Associated With Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Gustavo G Nascimento, Huihua Li, Rahul Malhotra, Fábio R M Leite, Karen G Peres, Angelique Chan, Marco A Peres
{"title":"Chewing Disability Is Associated With Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults: A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Gustavo G Nascimento, Huihua Li, Rahul Malhotra, Fábio R M Leite, Karen G Peres, Angelique Chan, Marco A Peres","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chewing disability is associated with impaired quality of life, potentially leading to depression, and cognitive impairment. Although the chewing-ability-cognition relationship has been explored, examining whether depression mediates this relationship remains unclear. We investigated the association between chewing disability and cognitive impairment development and a potential mediation via depression among older persons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older persons without cognitive impairment at baseline (n = 973) from the 3 waves of the Panel on Health and Ageing of Singaporean Elderly were investigated. The outcome was incident cognitive impairment by the end of the study, while the exposure was chewing disability over the study period. Time-varying depression was the mediator. Time-fixed confounders included sex, ethnicity, education, marital status, living arrangement, and housing type, and time-varying confounders included age, smoking, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, number of teeth, and denture wearing. We used marginal structural modeling to evaluate the effect of chewing disability on cognitive impairment development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 years, 11% developed cognitive impairment, and chewing disability was reported by 33%. Chewing disability was associated with higher odds of developing cognitive impairment (OR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.87), of which 85.3% was explained by the controlled direct effect of chewing disability, whereas the remaining 14.7% could be eliminated if there was no depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate an association between chewing disability and cognitive impairment, while the role of depression could not be fully elucidated. Oral health should be incorporated as part of older persons' care for its potential to assess the risk for other systemic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chewing disability is associated with impaired quality of life, potentially leading to depression, and cognitive impairment. Although the chewing-ability-cognition relationship has been explored, examining whether depression mediates this relationship remains unclear. We investigated the association between chewing disability and cognitive impairment development and a potential mediation via depression among older persons.

Methods: Older persons without cognitive impairment at baseline (n = 973) from the 3 waves of the Panel on Health and Ageing of Singaporean Elderly were investigated. The outcome was incident cognitive impairment by the end of the study, while the exposure was chewing disability over the study period. Time-varying depression was the mediator. Time-fixed confounders included sex, ethnicity, education, marital status, living arrangement, and housing type, and time-varying confounders included age, smoking, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, number of teeth, and denture wearing. We used marginal structural modeling to evaluate the effect of chewing disability on cognitive impairment development.

Results: After 6 years, 11% developed cognitive impairment, and chewing disability was reported by 33%. Chewing disability was associated with higher odds of developing cognitive impairment (OR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.87), of which 85.3% was explained by the controlled direct effect of chewing disability, whereas the remaining 14.7% could be eliminated if there was no depression.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate an association between chewing disability and cognitive impairment, while the role of depression could not be fully elucidated. Oral health should be incorporated as part of older persons' care for its potential to assess the risk for other systemic conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咀嚼障碍与老年人的认知障碍有关:一项基于人群的队列研究。
背景:咀嚼障碍与生活质量受损有关,可能导致抑郁和认知障碍。虽然咀嚼能力与认知能力之间的关系已经得到了探讨,但抑郁是否调解了这种关系仍不清楚。我们研究了老年人咀嚼障碍与认知障碍发展之间的关系,以及通过抑郁进行调解的可能性:方法:我们对新加坡老年人健康与老龄化小组(PHASE)三次调查中基线无认知障碍的老年人(973 人)进行了调查。研究结果是研究结束时发生的认知障碍,而暴露是研究期间的咀嚼障碍。随时间变化的抑郁是中介因素。时间固定的混杂因素包括性别、种族、教育程度、婚姻状况、居住安排和住房类型,时间变化的混杂因素包括年龄、吸烟、心血管疾病、糖尿病、牙齿数量和义齿佩戴情况。我们采用边际结构模型来评估咀嚼障碍对认知障碍发展的影响:六年后,11%的人出现了认知障碍,33%的人报告有咀嚼障碍。咀嚼障碍与较高的认知障碍发生几率相关(OR 1.43,95% CI 1.09,1.87),其中 85.3% 的原因是咀嚼障碍的直接控制效应,而其余 14.7% 的原因可以在没有抑郁的情况下排除:我们的研究结果表明,咀嚼功能障碍与认知障碍之间存在关联,而抑郁症的作用尚未完全阐明。口腔健康应作为老年人护理的一部分,因为它有可能评估其他系统疾病的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disentangling Anemia in Frailty: Exploring the Role of Inflammation. Inflammatory Indices and Their Associations with Postoperative Delirium. Metabolic signature of insulin resistance and risk of Alzheimer's disease. Higher-order disease interactions in multimorbidity measurement: marginal benefit over additive disease summation. Sex Differences in the Association Between 24-hour Rest-Activity Rhythms and Frailty Among U.S. Older Adults: Findings from NHANES 2011-2014.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1