Computer science and engineering students’ self-directed learning strategies and satisfaction with online learning

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Education Open Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100168
Meina Zhu , Sarah Berri , Yaoxian Huang , Sara Masoud
{"title":"Computer science and engineering students’ self-directed learning strategies and satisfaction with online learning","authors":"Meina Zhu ,&nbsp;Sarah Berri ,&nbsp;Yaoxian Huang ,&nbsp;Sara Masoud","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is an increasing need for computer science and engineering (CSE) online education. This study examined CSE online learners’ perceptions of self-directed learning (SDL) readiness, strategies, and satisfaction. The researchers surveyed 225 students and conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 online CSE students. The quantitative survey data and the qualitative interview data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, respectively. The findings were as follows: (1) Both extrinsic motivation strategies (e.g., future career development, building a learning routine) and intrinsic motivation strategies (e.g., interest in learning) were utilized; (2) Diverse metacognition strategies (e.g., assignments, quizzes, and tests, discussing with peers, tracking progress, staying in touch with professors and teaching assistants) and cognitive strategies (e.g., watching recorded lectures, taking notes, reading books, seeking out information) were used to monitor learning; (3) Time-management (e.g., priority, checklist, fixed schedule, time-block for study) and resource management strategies (e.g., focused on lectures, textbook reading) were leveraged; (4) Specific designs or instruction promoted students’ SDL skills, such as access to documented learning materials, reminders sent from instructors, availability of the instructor, group interaction, and flexibility, and (5) Student satisfaction depended on the design of the course. The advantages and disadvantages of online learning were identified. The findings indicated that the instruction strategies and online course design are critical for CSE students’ SDL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100168"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000090/pdfft?md5=79da20f51c65545e82475a5335955cad&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000090-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an increasing need for computer science and engineering (CSE) online education. This study examined CSE online learners’ perceptions of self-directed learning (SDL) readiness, strategies, and satisfaction. The researchers surveyed 225 students and conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 online CSE students. The quantitative survey data and the qualitative interview data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, respectively. The findings were as follows: (1) Both extrinsic motivation strategies (e.g., future career development, building a learning routine) and intrinsic motivation strategies (e.g., interest in learning) were utilized; (2) Diverse metacognition strategies (e.g., assignments, quizzes, and tests, discussing with peers, tracking progress, staying in touch with professors and teaching assistants) and cognitive strategies (e.g., watching recorded lectures, taking notes, reading books, seeking out information) were used to monitor learning; (3) Time-management (e.g., priority, checklist, fixed schedule, time-block for study) and resource management strategies (e.g., focused on lectures, textbook reading) were leveraged; (4) Specific designs or instruction promoted students’ SDL skills, such as access to documented learning materials, reminders sent from instructors, availability of the instructor, group interaction, and flexibility, and (5) Student satisfaction depended on the design of the course. The advantages and disadvantages of online learning were identified. The findings indicated that the instruction strategies and online course design are critical for CSE students’ SDL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机科学与工程专业学生的自主学习策略和对在线学习的满意度
计算机科学与工程(CSE)在线教育的需求日益增长。本研究考察了 CSE 在线学习者对自主学习(SDL)的准备程度、策略和满意度的看法。研究人员调查了 225 名学生,并对 15 名 CSE 在线学生进行了半结构化访谈。定量调查数据和定性访谈数据分别采用描述性统计和主题分析法进行了分析。研究结果如下(1) 使用了外在动机策略(如未来职业发展、建立学习常规)和内在动机策略(如学习兴趣);(2) 使用了多种元认知策略(如作业、测验和考试);(3) 使用了多种学习方法(如学习策略、学习方法和学习方法);(4) 使用了多种学习策略(如学习策略、学习策略和学习方法)、(2) 采用多种元认知策略(如作业、小测验和测试、与同伴讨论、跟踪学习进度、与教授和助教保持联系)和认知策略(如观看讲座录音、做笔记、阅读书籍、查找资料)来监控学习情况;(3) 采用时间管理(如优先级、检查表、固定时间表、时间管理)来监控学习情况、(4) 特定的设计或教学促进了学生的 SDL 技能,如获取记录在案的学习材料、教师发送的提醒、教师的可用性、小组互动和灵活性;以及 (5) 学生的满意度取决于课程的设计。确定了在线学习的优缺点。研究结果表明,教学策略和在线课程设计对 CSE 学生的 SDL 至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does technology-based non-interactive teaching enhance students’ learning in the classroom? Does testing environment matter for virtual school students? What influences teachers’ implementation of ICT in early childhood education? A qualitative exploration based on an ecological-TPACK framework Middle school teachers’ implementation and perceptions of automated writing evaluation University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1