Homogeneity tests and interval estimations of risk differences for stratified bilateral and unilateral correlated data

IF 1.2 3区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Statistical Papers Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s00362-024-01532-6
Shuyi Liang, Kai-Tai Fang, Xin-Wei Huang, Yijing Xin, Chang-Xing Ma
{"title":"Homogeneity tests and interval estimations of risk differences for stratified bilateral and unilateral correlated data","authors":"Shuyi Liang, Kai-Tai Fang, Xin-Wei Huang, Yijing Xin, Chang-Xing Ma","doi":"10.1007/s00362-024-01532-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In clinical trials studying paired parts of a subject with binary outcomes, it is expected to collect measurements bilaterally. However, there are cases where subjects contribute measurements for only one part. By utilizing combined data, it is possible to gain additional information compared to using bilateral or unilateral data alone. With the combined data, this article investigates homogeneity tests of risk differences with the presence of stratification effects and proposes interval estimations of a common risk difference if stratification does not introduce underlying dissimilarities. Under Dallal’s model (Biometrics 44:253–257, 1988), we propose three test statistics and evaluate their performances regarding type I error controls and powers. Confidence intervals of a common risk difference with satisfactory coverage probabilities and interval length are constructed. Our simulation results show that the score test is the most robust and the profile likelihood confidence interval outperforms other methods proposed. Data from a study of acute otitis media is used to illustrate our proposed procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51166,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Papers","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-024-01532-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In clinical trials studying paired parts of a subject with binary outcomes, it is expected to collect measurements bilaterally. However, there are cases where subjects contribute measurements for only one part. By utilizing combined data, it is possible to gain additional information compared to using bilateral or unilateral data alone. With the combined data, this article investigates homogeneity tests of risk differences with the presence of stratification effects and proposes interval estimations of a common risk difference if stratification does not introduce underlying dissimilarities. Under Dallal’s model (Biometrics 44:253–257, 1988), we propose three test statistics and evaluate their performances regarding type I error controls and powers. Confidence intervals of a common risk difference with satisfactory coverage probabilities and interval length are constructed. Our simulation results show that the score test is the most robust and the profile likelihood confidence interval outperforms other methods proposed. Data from a study of acute otitis media is used to illustrate our proposed procedures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分层双边和单边相关数据的同质性检验和风险差异区间估计
在对受试者的成对部分进行二元结果研究的临床试验中,预计要收集双侧的测量数据。不过,也有受试者只对一个部位进行测量的情况。与单独使用双侧或单侧数据相比,利用组合数据可以获得更多信息。利用合并数据,本文研究了存在分层效应时风险差异的同质性检验,并提出了在分层不引入潜在差异的情况下共同风险差异的区间估计。根据 Dallal 的模型(Biometrics 44:253-257, 1988),我们提出了三种检验统计量,并评估了它们在 I 型误差控制和幂级数方面的表现。我们构建了具有令人满意的覆盖概率和区间长度的共同风险差异置信区间。我们的模拟结果表明,得分检验是最稳健的,轮廓似然置信区间优于其他方法。我们使用急性中耳炎的研究数据来说明我们提出的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Papers
Statistical Papers 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Statistical Papers addresses itself to all persons and organizations that have to deal with statistical methods in their own field of work. It attempts to provide a forum for the presentation and critical assessment of statistical methods, in particular for the discussion of their methodological foundations as well as their potential applications. Methods that have broad applications will be preferred. However, special attention is given to those statistical methods which are relevant to the economic and social sciences. In addition to original research papers, readers will find survey articles, short notes, reports on statistical software, problem section, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The distribution of power-related random variables (and their use in clinical trials) The cost of sequential adaptation and the lower bound for mean squared error Nested strong orthogonal arrays Tests for time-varying coefficient spatial autoregressive panel data model with fixed effects On the consistency of supervised learning with missing values
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1