GRLMerger: an automatic approach for integrating GRL models

IF 2.1 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Requirements Engineering Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s00766-024-00413-6
Nadeen AlAmoudi, Jameleddine Hassine, Malak Baslyman
{"title":"GRLMerger: an automatic approach for integrating GRL models","authors":"Nadeen AlAmoudi, Jameleddine Hassine, Malak Baslyman","doi":"10.1007/s00766-024-00413-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Goal-oriented requirements engineering aims to describe both stakeholders and system goals and their relationships using goal models. Large goal models for complex systems are often constructed from sub-models describing various stakeholders’ views and context-related aspects. These goal-oriented sub-models, also called views, may exhibit overlaps and present discrepancies. Hence, integrating such views is considered a significant barrier to the construction of a unified goal model. Current approaches to merging goal models require intensive human intervention. This paper proposes an approach and a prototype tool, called <i>GRLMerger</i>, to integrate two GRL (Goal-oriented Requirement Language) models into one consolidated model that is correct, complete, and free from any conflict that may arise during the merging process. <i>GRLMerger</i> considers both syntactic and semantic aspects of the GRL models and allows analysts to merge them either interactively or in a fully automated mode. <i>GRLMerger</i> employs natural language processing (NLP) techniques to match intentional elements based on their semantic similarity. The proposed <i>GRLMerger</i> approach and tool have been validated using 12 experimental tasks derived from two case studies, exhibiting very promising performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20912,"journal":{"name":"Requirements Engineering","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Requirements Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-024-00413-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal-oriented requirements engineering aims to describe both stakeholders and system goals and their relationships using goal models. Large goal models for complex systems are often constructed from sub-models describing various stakeholders’ views and context-related aspects. These goal-oriented sub-models, also called views, may exhibit overlaps and present discrepancies. Hence, integrating such views is considered a significant barrier to the construction of a unified goal model. Current approaches to merging goal models require intensive human intervention. This paper proposes an approach and a prototype tool, called GRLMerger, to integrate two GRL (Goal-oriented Requirement Language) models into one consolidated model that is correct, complete, and free from any conflict that may arise during the merging process. GRLMerger considers both syntactic and semantic aspects of the GRL models and allows analysts to merge them either interactively or in a fully automated mode. GRLMerger employs natural language processing (NLP) techniques to match intentional elements based on their semantic similarity. The proposed GRLMerger approach and tool have been validated using 12 experimental tasks derived from two case studies, exhibiting very promising performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GRLMerger:整合 GRL 模型的自动方法
以目标为导向的需求工程旨在利用目标模型来描述利益相关者和系统目标及其关系。复杂系统的大型目标模型通常由描述各利益相关者观点和上下文相关方面的子模型构建而成。这些面向目标的子模型(也称为观点)可能会出现重叠和差异。因此,整合这些观点被认为是构建统一目标模型的一大障碍。目前合并目标模型的方法需要大量人工干预。本文提出了一种名为 GRLMerger 的方法和原型工具,可将两个 GRL(面向目标的需求语言)模型整合为一个合并模型,该模型正确、完整,且在合并过程中不会出现任何冲突。GRLMerger 考虑了 GRL 模型的语法和语义方面,允许分析人员以交互方式或全自动模式合并这些模型。GRLMerger 采用自然语言处理(NLP)技术,根据语义相似性匹配意向元素。拟议的 GRLMerger 方法和工具已通过源自两项案例研究的 12 项实验任务进行了验证,表现出非常良好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Requirements Engineering
Requirements Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal provides a focus for the dissemination of new results about the elicitation, representation and validation of requirements of software intensive information systems or applications. Theoretical and applied submissions are welcome, but all papers must explicitly address: -the practical consequences of the ideas for the design of complex systems -how the ideas should be evaluated by the reflective practitioner The journal is motivated by a multi-disciplinary view that considers requirements not only in terms of software components specification but also in terms of activities for their elicitation, representation and agreement, carried out within an organisational and social context. To this end, contributions are sought from fields such as software engineering, information systems, occupational sociology, cognitive and organisational psychology, human-computer interaction, computer-supported cooperative work, linguistics and philosophy for work addressing specifically requirements engineering issues.
期刊最新文献
New product development based on non-functional requirements in renewable energy industries using hesitant fuzzy QFD-DFX approach Recommending and release planning of user-driven functionality deletion for mobile apps Benchmarking requirement template systems: comparing appropriateness, usability, and expressiveness A natural language-based method to specify privacy requirements: an evaluation with practitioners Navigating personalized medication: unveiling user needs to forge a cutting-edge platform for proactive prevention and monitoring of adverse drug reactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1