Determining the feasibility of linked claims and vaccination data for a Covid-vaccine pharmaco-epidemiological study in Germany - RiCO feasibility study protocol

Nina Timmesfeld, Peter Ihle, Robin Denz, Katharina Meiszl, Katrin Scholz, Doris Oberle, Ursula Drechsel-Baeuerle, Brigitte Keller-Stanislawski, Hans H. Diebner, Ingo Meyer
{"title":"Determining the feasibility of linked claims and vaccination data for a Covid-vaccine pharmaco-epidemiological study in Germany - RiCO feasibility study protocol","authors":"Nina Timmesfeld, Peter Ihle, Robin Denz, Katharina Meiszl, Katrin Scholz, Doris Oberle, Ursula Drechsel-Baeuerle, Brigitte Keller-Stanislawski, Hans H. Diebner, Ingo Meyer","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.04.24303714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Germany, there has been no population-level pharmaco-epidemiological study on the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines. One factor preventing such a study so far relates to challenges combining the different relevant data bodies on vaccination with suitable outcome data, specifically statutory health insurance claims data. Individual identifiers used across these data bodies are of unknown quality and reliability for data linkage. As part of a larger pharmaco-vigilance study on the COVID-19 vaccines, called RiCO (German \"Risikoevaluation der COVID-19-Impfstoffe\", Englisch \"Risk assessment of COVID-19 vaccines\"), a feasibility study is being conducted to determine the overall confidence level with which existing data can be analysed in relation to the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. This RiCO feasibility study will establish a dataflow combining claims data and vaccination data for a sub-sample of the total German population, describe data quality for each data set from the various sources, estimate the proportion of the different linkage errors and will develop various approaches for linking the data in addition to the simple form of linkage using a common identifier in order to reduce possible linkage errors. These last three points are the core objective of the feasibility study. A secondary objective is to test the viability of the required dataflow involving multiple stakeholders from different parts of the healthcare system. Results will be published and used to plan the actual pharmaco-vigilance study on the COVID-19 vaccines for Germany, as well as future research on the role of COVID vaccines as risk or protective factors for long-term COVID-19 effects.","PeriodicalId":501447,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.04.24303714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Germany, there has been no population-level pharmaco-epidemiological study on the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines. One factor preventing such a study so far relates to challenges combining the different relevant data bodies on vaccination with suitable outcome data, specifically statutory health insurance claims data. Individual identifiers used across these data bodies are of unknown quality and reliability for data linkage. As part of a larger pharmaco-vigilance study on the COVID-19 vaccines, called RiCO (German "Risikoevaluation der COVID-19-Impfstoffe", Englisch "Risk assessment of COVID-19 vaccines"), a feasibility study is being conducted to determine the overall confidence level with which existing data can be analysed in relation to the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. This RiCO feasibility study will establish a dataflow combining claims data and vaccination data for a sub-sample of the total German population, describe data quality for each data set from the various sources, estimate the proportion of the different linkage errors and will develop various approaches for linking the data in addition to the simple form of linkage using a common identifier in order to reduce possible linkage errors. These last three points are the core objective of the feasibility study. A secondary objective is to test the viability of the required dataflow involving multiple stakeholders from different parts of the healthcare system. Results will be published and used to plan the actual pharmaco-vigilance study on the COVID-19 vaccines for Germany, as well as future research on the role of COVID vaccines as risk or protective factors for long-term COVID-19 effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定在德国进行 Covid 疫苗药物流行病学研究时将索赔和疫苗接种数据联系起来的可行性 - RiCO 可行性研究方案
德国尚未对 Covid-19 疫苗的安全性进行人群药物流行病学研究。迄今为止,阻碍此类研究的一个因素是将不同的疫苗接种相关数据机构与合适的结果数据(特别是法定医疗保险索赔数据)结合起来所面临的挑战。这些数据机构所使用的个人标识符在数据连接方面的质量和可靠性尚不清楚。作为 COVID-19 疫苗大型药物警戒研究(名为 RiCO,德语为 "Risikoevaluation der COVID-19-Impfstoffe",英语为 "Risk assessment of COVID-19 vaccines")的一部分,目前正在进行一项可行性研究,以确定现有数据在分析 COVID-19 疫苗安全性方面的总体可信度。这项 RiCO 可行性研究将建立一个数据流,将德国总人口中的一个子样本的索赔数据和疫苗接种数据结合起来,描述来自不同来源的每个数据集的数据质量,估算不同链接错误的比例,并在使用通用标识符的简单链接形式之外开发各种数据链接方法,以减少可能的链接错误。后三点是可行性研究的核心目标。次要目标是测试所需数据流的可行性,涉及医疗系统不同部门的多个利益相关者。研究结果将公布于众,并将用于规划德国 COVID-19 疫苗的实际药物警戒研究,以及未来关于 COVID 疫苗作为 COVID-19 长期影响的风险或保护因素的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tucaresol: An Oral Candidate Drug With Two Distinct Antiviral Mechanisms. Comparative Risk of the Onset of Atrial Fibrillation after Icosapent Ethyl versus Omega-3–Acid-Ethyl-Esters Adjuvant to Statins A Novel Maxillofacial Technology for Drug Administration-A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Metronidazole. Protective Effects of Psychiatric Medications against COVID-19 Mortality Before Vaccines Anti-cancer effect of memantine as adjunctive therapy in metastatic colon cancer: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1