Distinctive antibody responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and brain infection.

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1093/brain/awae066
Marianna Spatola, Nadège Nziza, Edward B Irvine, Deniz Cizmeci, Wonyeong Jung, Le Hong Van, Le Thanh Hoang Nhat, Vu Thi Ngoc Ha, Nguyen Hoan Phu, Dang Trung Nghia Ho, Guy E Thwaites, Douglas A Lauffenburger, Sarah Fortune, Nguyen Thuy Thuong Thuong, Galit Alter
{"title":"Distinctive antibody responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and brain infection.","authors":"Marianna Spatola, Nadège Nziza, Edward B Irvine, Deniz Cizmeci, Wonyeong Jung, Le Hong Van, Le Thanh Hoang Nhat, Vu Thi Ngoc Ha, Nguyen Hoan Phu, Dang Trung Nghia Ho, Guy E Thwaites, Douglas A Lauffenburger, Sarah Fortune, Nguyen Thuy Thuong Thuong, Galit Alter","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), remains a global health burden. While M. tuberculosis is primarily a respiratory pathogen, it can spread to other organs, including the brain and meninges, causing TB meningitis (TBM). However, little is known about the immunological mechanisms that lead to differential disease across organs. Attention has focused on differences in T cell responses in the control of M. tuberculosis in the lungs, but emerging data point to a role for antibodies, as both biomarkers of disease control and as antimicrobial molecules. Given an increasing appreciation for compartmentalized antibody responses across the blood-brain barrier, here we characterized the antibody profiles across the blood and brain compartments in TBM and determined whether M. tuberculosis-specific humoral immune responses differed between M. tuberculosis infection of the lung (pulmonary TB) and TBM. Using a high throughput systems serology approach, we deeply profiled the antibody responses against 10 different M. tuberculosis antigens, including lipoarabinomannan (LAM) and purified protein derivative (PPD), in HIV-negative adults with pulmonary TB (n = 10) versus TBM (n = 60). Antibody studies included analysis of immunoglobulin isotypes (IgG, IgM, IgA) and subclass levels (IgG1-4) and the capacity of M. tuberculosis-specific antibodies to bind to Fc receptors or C1q and to activate innate immune effector functions (complement and natural killer cell activation; monocyte or neutrophil phagocytosis). Machine learning methods were applied to characterize serum and CSF responses in TBM, identify prognostic factors associated with disease severity, and define the key antibody features that distinguish TBM from pulmonary TB. In individuals with TBM, we identified CSF-specific antibody profiles that marked a unique and compartmentalized humoral response against M. tuberculosis, characterized by an enrichment of M. tuberculosis-specific antibodies able to robustly activate complement and drive phagocytosis by monocytes and neutrophils, all of which were associated with milder TBM severity at presentation. Moreover, individuals with TBM exhibited M. tuberculosis-specific antibodies in the serum with an increased capacity to activate phagocytosis by monocytes, compared with individuals with pulmonary TB, despite having lower IgG titres and Fcγ receptor-binding capacity. Collectively, these data point to functionally divergent humoral responses depending on the site of infection (i.e. lungs versus brain) and demonstrate a highly compartmentalized M. tuberculosis-specific antibody response within the CSF in TBM. Moreover, our results suggest that phagocytosis- and complement-mediating antibodies may promote attenuated neuropathology and milder TBM disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), remains a global health burden. While M. tuberculosis is primarily a respiratory pathogen, it can spread to other organs, including the brain and meninges, causing TB meningitis (TBM). However, little is known about the immunological mechanisms that lead to differential disease across organs. Attention has focused on differences in T cell responses in the control of M. tuberculosis in the lungs, but emerging data point to a role for antibodies, as both biomarkers of disease control and as antimicrobial molecules. Given an increasing appreciation for compartmentalized antibody responses across the blood-brain barrier, here we characterized the antibody profiles across the blood and brain compartments in TBM and determined whether M. tuberculosis-specific humoral immune responses differed between M. tuberculosis infection of the lung (pulmonary TB) and TBM. Using a high throughput systems serology approach, we deeply profiled the antibody responses against 10 different M. tuberculosis antigens, including lipoarabinomannan (LAM) and purified protein derivative (PPD), in HIV-negative adults with pulmonary TB (n = 10) versus TBM (n = 60). Antibody studies included analysis of immunoglobulin isotypes (IgG, IgM, IgA) and subclass levels (IgG1-4) and the capacity of M. tuberculosis-specific antibodies to bind to Fc receptors or C1q and to activate innate immune effector functions (complement and natural killer cell activation; monocyte or neutrophil phagocytosis). Machine learning methods were applied to characterize serum and CSF responses in TBM, identify prognostic factors associated with disease severity, and define the key antibody features that distinguish TBM from pulmonary TB. In individuals with TBM, we identified CSF-specific antibody profiles that marked a unique and compartmentalized humoral response against M. tuberculosis, characterized by an enrichment of M. tuberculosis-specific antibodies able to robustly activate complement and drive phagocytosis by monocytes and neutrophils, all of which were associated with milder TBM severity at presentation. Moreover, individuals with TBM exhibited M. tuberculosis-specific antibodies in the serum with an increased capacity to activate phagocytosis by monocytes, compared with individuals with pulmonary TB, despite having lower IgG titres and Fcγ receptor-binding capacity. Collectively, these data point to functionally divergent humoral responses depending on the site of infection (i.e. lungs versus brain) and demonstrate a highly compartmentalized M. tuberculosis-specific antibody response within the CSF in TBM. Moreover, our results suggest that phagocytosis- and complement-mediating antibodies may promote attenuated neuropathology and milder TBM disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺部和脑部感染结核分枝杆菌的不同抗体反应。
结核分枝杆菌(Mtb)是结核病(TB)的致病菌,一直是全球健康的负担。虽然结核分枝杆菌(Mtb)主要是呼吸道病原体,但它也可传播到其他器官,包括大脑和脑膜,引起结核性脑膜炎(TBM)。然而,人们对导致不同器官发生不同疾病的免疫机制知之甚少。人们关注的重点是 T 细胞反应在肺部控制 Mtb 的过程中的差异,但新出现的数据表明,抗体既是疾病控制的生物标志物,也是抗菌分子。鉴于人们越来越重视跨血脑屏障的分区抗体反应,我们在这里描述了TBM期间血液和大脑分区的抗体概况,并确定了Mtb特异性体液免疫反应在肺部Mtb感染(肺结核)和TBM之间是否存在差异。利用高通量系统血清学方法,我们深入分析了艾滋病毒阴性成人肺结核患者(10 人)与 TBM 患者(60 人)针对 10 种不同 Mtb 抗原的抗体反应,包括脂质抗原(LAM)和纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)。抗体研究包括分析免疫球蛋白异型(IgG、IgM、IgA)和亚类水平(IgG1-4)、Mtb 特异性抗体与 Fc 受体或 C1q 结合的能力以及激活先天性免疫效应器功能(补体和 NK 细胞激活、单核细胞或中性粒细胞吞噬)的能力。我们采用机器学习方法来描述肺结核患者的血清和脑脊液反应,确定与疾病严重程度相关的预后因素,并定义区分肺结核与肺结核的关键抗体特征。在TBM患者中,我们发现了CSF特异性抗体谱,这种抗体谱标志着针对Mtb的独特、分区化的体液反应,其特点是Mtb特异性抗体的富集,能够强效激活补体并驱动单核细胞和中性粒细胞的吞噬作用,所有这些都与TBM发病时的严重程度较轻有关。此外,尽管肺结核患者的IgG滴度和Fcγ受体(FcγR)结合能力较低,但与肺结核患者相比,肺结核患者血清中的Mtb特异性抗体具有更强的激活单核细胞吞噬能力。总之,这些数据表明,体液反应的功能因感染部位(即肺部与脑部)而异,并证明了在TBM期间脑脊液中存在高度分区化的Mtb特异性抗体反应。此外,我们的研究结果表明,吞噬和补体介导的抗体可能会促进神经病理学的减弱和TBM病情的减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Phase 2b program with sonlicromanol in patients with mitochondrial disease due to m.3243A>G mutation. Focal brain administration of antiseizure medications improves outcomes and reduces side effects. Tau, synapse loss and gliosis progress in an Alzheimer's mouse model after amyloid-β immunotherapy. Mental health disorders before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide study. Smaller cingulate grey matter mediates the association between dual-task gait and incident dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1