Pollen diet diversity across bee lineages varies with lifestyle rather than colony size.

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Insect Science Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1093/jisesa/ieae023
Kedar Devkota, Charles F Dos Santos, Patrick D Souza-Santos, Jenifer D Ramos, Alex Otesbelgue, Binayak Prakash Mishra, Eduardo A B Almeida, Betina Blochtein
{"title":"Pollen diet diversity across bee lineages varies with lifestyle rather than colony size.","authors":"Kedar Devkota, Charles F Dos Santos, Patrick D Souza-Santos, Jenifer D Ramos, Alex Otesbelgue, Binayak Prakash Mishra, Eduardo A B Almeida, Betina Blochtein","doi":"10.1093/jisesa/ieae023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The shift to a pollen diet and the evolution of more highly organized societies, i.e., eusocial, were key milestones in bee diversification over their evolutionary history, culminating in a high dependence on feeding broods with a large variety of floral resources. Here, we hypothesized that obligatory eusocial bees have a wider diet diversity than their relatives with solitary lifestyles, and this would be related to colony size. To test both hypotheses, we surveyed diet breadth data (palynological analysis) based on the Shannon-Wiener index (H') for 85 bee taxa. We also obtained colony size for 47 eusocial bee species. These data were examined using phylogenetic comparative methods. The results support the generalist strategy as a derived trait for the bee taxa evaluated here. The dietary diversity of eusocial bees (H': 2.1, on average) was 67.5% higher than that of noneusocial bees (H': 1.21, on average). There was, however, no relationship between diet breadth and colony size, indicating that smaller colonies can harvest a pollen variety as diverse as larger colonies. Taken together, these results provide new insights into the impact of lifestyle on the diversity of collected pollen. Furthermore, this work sheds light on an advantage of living in more highly structured societies irrespective of the size of the colony.</p>","PeriodicalId":16156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insect Science","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieae023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The shift to a pollen diet and the evolution of more highly organized societies, i.e., eusocial, were key milestones in bee diversification over their evolutionary history, culminating in a high dependence on feeding broods with a large variety of floral resources. Here, we hypothesized that obligatory eusocial bees have a wider diet diversity than their relatives with solitary lifestyles, and this would be related to colony size. To test both hypotheses, we surveyed diet breadth data (palynological analysis) based on the Shannon-Wiener index (H') for 85 bee taxa. We also obtained colony size for 47 eusocial bee species. These data were examined using phylogenetic comparative methods. The results support the generalist strategy as a derived trait for the bee taxa evaluated here. The dietary diversity of eusocial bees (H': 2.1, on average) was 67.5% higher than that of noneusocial bees (H': 1.21, on average). There was, however, no relationship between diet breadth and colony size, indicating that smaller colonies can harvest a pollen variety as diverse as larger colonies. Taken together, these results provide new insights into the impact of lifestyle on the diversity of collected pollen. Furthermore, this work sheds light on an advantage of living in more highly structured societies irrespective of the size of the colony.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同蜂系的花粉食物多样性随生活方式而异,而非蜂群大小。
在蜜蜂的进化史上,以花粉为食的转变和组织化程度更高的社会(即群居社会)的进化是蜜蜂多样化的关键里程碑,最终导致蜜蜂高度依赖于用大量花卉资源喂养雏蜂。在此,我们假设,与独居生活方式的蜜蜂亲属相比,强制性群居生活方式的蜜蜂具有更广泛的食物多样性,而这将与蜂群大小有关。为了验证这两个假设,我们根据香农-维纳指数(H')调查了 85 个蜜蜂类群的食性广度数据(古生物学分析)。我们还获得了 47 种社会性蜜蜂的蜂群规模。我们使用系统发育比较方法对这些数据进行了研究。结果表明,在本文评估的蜜蜂类群中,通才策略是一种衍生性状。社会性蜜蜂的食物多样性(H':平均 2.1)比非社会性蜜蜂的食物多样性(H':平均 1.21)高出 67.5%。然而,食物广度与蜂群大小之间没有关系,这表明较小的蜂群也能像较大的蜂群一样收获种类繁多的花粉。综上所述,这些结果为了解生活方式对采集花粉多样性的影响提供了新的视角。此外,这项研究还揭示了无论蜂群大小,生活在高度结构化社会中的一种优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Insect Science
Journal of Insect Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Insect Science was founded with support from the University of Arizona library in 2001 by Dr. Henry Hagedorn, who served as editor-in-chief until his death in January 2014. The Entomological Society of America was very pleased to add the Journal of Insect Science to its publishing portfolio in 2014. The fully open access journal publishes papers in all aspects of the biology of insects and other arthropods from the molecular to the ecological, and their agricultural and medical impact.
期刊最新文献
Bee cups 2.0: P-cups as single-use cages for honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) experiments. Direct and indirect effects of selective insecticides on 2 generalist predators of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Low-density migratory beekeeping induces intermediate disturbance effects on native bee communities in Tibetan Plateau alpine meadows. Population records reveal expanded habitat preference for the endemic, predaceous Jamaican fungus gnat Neoditomyia farri (Diptera, Keroplatidae). Cellulose degradation in Glenea cantor (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae): functional characterization of GcEGaseZ7 and Cellulase reveals a novel enzymatic activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1