Investigation of sex-based differences in the immunotoxicity of silver nanoparticles.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q3 NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY Nanotoxicology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1080/17435390.2024.2323070
Brandon Canup, Paul Rogers, Angel Paredes, Wimolnut Manheng, Beverly Lyn-Cook, Tariq Fahmi
{"title":"Investigation of sex-based differences in the immunotoxicity of silver nanoparticles.","authors":"Brandon Canup, Paul Rogers, Angel Paredes, Wimolnut Manheng, Beverly Lyn-Cook, Tariq Fahmi","doi":"10.1080/17435390.2024.2323070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The growing application of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in consumer, healthcare, and industrial products has raised concern over potential health implications due to increasing exposure. The evaluation of the immune response to nanomaterials is one of the key criteria to assess their biocompatibility. There are well-recognized sex-based differences in innate and adaptive immune responses. However, there is limited information available using human models. The aim was to investigate the potential sex-based differences in immune functions after exposure to AgNPs using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and plasma from healthy donors. These functions include inflammasome activation, cytokine expression, leukocyte proliferation, chemotaxis, plasma coagulation, and complement activation. AgNPs were characterized by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy. Inflammasome activation by AgNPs was measured after 6- and 24-hours incubations. AgNPs-induced inflammasome activation was significantly higher in the females, especially for the 6-hour exposure. No sex-based differences were observed for Ag ions controls. Younger donors exhibited significantly more inflammasome activation than older donors after 24-hours exposure. IL-10 was significantly suppressed in males and females after exposure. AgNPs suppressed leukocyte proliferation similarly in males and females. No chemoattractant effects, no alterations in plasma coagulation, or activation of the complement were observed after AgNPs exposure. In conclusion, the results highlight that there are distinct sex-based differences in inflammasome activation after exposure to AgNPs in human PBMCs. The results highlight the importance of considering sex-based differences in inflammasome activation induced by exposure to AgNPs in any future biocompatibility assessment for products containing AgNPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18899,"journal":{"name":"Nanotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":"134-159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2024.2323070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing application of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in consumer, healthcare, and industrial products has raised concern over potential health implications due to increasing exposure. The evaluation of the immune response to nanomaterials is one of the key criteria to assess their biocompatibility. There are well-recognized sex-based differences in innate and adaptive immune responses. However, there is limited information available using human models. The aim was to investigate the potential sex-based differences in immune functions after exposure to AgNPs using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and plasma from healthy donors. These functions include inflammasome activation, cytokine expression, leukocyte proliferation, chemotaxis, plasma coagulation, and complement activation. AgNPs were characterized by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy. Inflammasome activation by AgNPs was measured after 6- and 24-hours incubations. AgNPs-induced inflammasome activation was significantly higher in the females, especially for the 6-hour exposure. No sex-based differences were observed for Ag ions controls. Younger donors exhibited significantly more inflammasome activation than older donors after 24-hours exposure. IL-10 was significantly suppressed in males and females after exposure. AgNPs suppressed leukocyte proliferation similarly in males and females. No chemoattractant effects, no alterations in plasma coagulation, or activation of the complement were observed after AgNPs exposure. In conclusion, the results highlight that there are distinct sex-based differences in inflammasome activation after exposure to AgNPs in human PBMCs. The results highlight the importance of considering sex-based differences in inflammasome activation induced by exposure to AgNPs in any future biocompatibility assessment for products containing AgNPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银纳米粒子免疫毒性的性别差异研究
随着银纳米粒子(AgNPs)在消费品、保健品和工业产品中的应用日益广泛,人们开始关注其接触量增加可能对健康造成的影响。评估纳米材料的免疫反应是评估其生物相容性的关键标准之一。在先天性免疫反应和适应性免疫反应方面存在着公认的性别差异。然而,利用人体模型获得的信息却很有限。我们的目的是利用健康捐献者的人类外周血单核细胞(PBMC)和血浆,研究暴露于 AgNPs 后免疫功能的潜在性别差异。这些功能包括炎性体激活、细胞因子表达、白细胞增殖、趋化性、血浆凝固和补体激活。通过动态光散射和透射电子显微镜对 AgNPs 进行了表征。经过 6 小时和 24 小时培养后,测量了 AgNPs 对炎症小体的激活作用。雌性动物的 AgNPs 诱导的炎症小体活化率明显更高,尤其是在暴露 6 小时后。在银离子对照组中未观察到性别差异。暴露 24 小时后,年轻供体的炎症小体活化程度明显高于年长供体。暴露后,男性和女性的 IL-10 均受到明显抑制。AgNPs 对男性和女性白细胞增殖的抑制作用相似。接触 AgNPs 后,未观察到化学吸引作用、血浆凝固性改变或补体激活。总之,研究结果表明,人类 PBMC 暴露于 AgNPs 后,炎性体的激活存在明显的性别差异。这些结果突出表明,在今后对含有 AgNPs 的产品进行生物相容性评估时,必须考虑到暴露于 AgNPs 所诱导的炎性体激活的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nanotoxicology
Nanotoxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Nanotoxicology invites contributions addressing research relating to the potential for human and environmental exposure, hazard and risk associated with the use and development of nano-structured materials. In this context, the term nano-structured materials has a broad definition, including ‘materials with at least one dimension in the nanometer size range’. These nanomaterials range from nanoparticles and nanomedicines, to nano-surfaces of larger materials and composite materials. The range of nanomaterials in use and under development is extremely diverse, so this journal includes a range of materials generated for purposeful delivery into the body (food, medicines, diagnostics and prosthetics), to consumer products (e.g. paints, cosmetics, electronics and clothing), and particles designed for environmental applications (e.g. remediation). It is the nano-size range if these materials which unifies them and defines the scope of Nanotoxicology . While the term ‘toxicology’ indicates risk, the journal Nanotoxicology also aims to encompass studies that enhance safety during the production, use and disposal of nanomaterials. Well-controlled studies demonstrating a lack of exposure, hazard or risk associated with nanomaterials, or studies aiming to improve biocompatibility are welcomed and encouraged, as such studies will lead to an advancement of nanotechnology. Furthermore, many nanoparticles are developed with the intention to improve human health (e.g. antimicrobial agents), and again, such articles are encouraged. In order to promote quality, Nanotoxicology will prioritise publications that have demonstrated characterisation of the nanomaterials investigated.
期刊最新文献
Environmental toxicity assessment of engineered nanoparticles manifest histo-hemato alterations to fresh water fish. In vivo assessment of topically applied silver nanoparticles on entire cornea: comprehensive FTIR study. Intraperitoneal hepatorenal toxicity of zinc oxide and nickel oxide nanoparticles in rats: a systematic review. Role of physicochemical properties in silica nanoparticle-mediated immunostimulation. Carbon quantum dots in breast cancer modulate cellular migration via cytoskeletal and nuclear structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1