The effect of smell training on COVID-19 induced smell loss.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin23.191
E J A Schepens, C J M de Haas, E M Postma, B van Dijk, S Boesveldt, I Stegeman, D M A Kamalski
{"title":"The effect of smell training on COVID-19 induced smell loss.","authors":"E J A Schepens, C J M de Haas, E M Postma, B van Dijk, S Boesveldt, I Stegeman, D M A Kamalski","doi":"10.4193/Rhin23.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>while smell training appears to be effective for post viral smell loss, its effectiveness in COVID-19 induced smell loss is currently not well known. Therefore, we aim to investigate the potential effect of smell training on patients with COVID-19 induced smell loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>we conducted a case-control study with two comparable cohorts. One of which (n=111) was instructed to perform smell training twice daily for 12 weeks, therapeutical adherence was monitored on a daily schedule, while the other cohort (n=50) did not perform smell training. The Sniffin' Sticks Test (SST) was used to objectify participants' sense of smell at baseline and after 12 weeks, reported as a Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI) score. We also determined the association between therapeutical adherence and the TDI scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>we found a significant difference in psychophysical smell function between patients with COVID-19 induced smell disorders who performed 12 weeks of smell training and those who did not. Median TDI difference between groups was 2.00 However, there was no association between the therapeutical adherence and olfactory function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>we discovered a significant moderate difference in psychophysical smell function between patients with COVID-19-induced smell disorders who performed smell training and those who did not, implying a possible advantage of training. However, no relationship was found between therapeutical adherence of smell training and olfactory function.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"386-393"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin23.191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: while smell training appears to be effective for post viral smell loss, its effectiveness in COVID-19 induced smell loss is currently not well known. Therefore, we aim to investigate the potential effect of smell training on patients with COVID-19 induced smell loss.

Methods: we conducted a case-control study with two comparable cohorts. One of which (n=111) was instructed to perform smell training twice daily for 12 weeks, therapeutical adherence was monitored on a daily schedule, while the other cohort (n=50) did not perform smell training. The Sniffin' Sticks Test (SST) was used to objectify participants' sense of smell at baseline and after 12 weeks, reported as a Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI) score. We also determined the association between therapeutical adherence and the TDI scores.

Results: we found a significant difference in psychophysical smell function between patients with COVID-19 induced smell disorders who performed 12 weeks of smell training and those who did not. Median TDI difference between groups was 2.00 However, there was no association between the therapeutical adherence and olfactory function.

Conclusion: we discovered a significant moderate difference in psychophysical smell function between patients with COVID-19-induced smell disorders who performed smell training and those who did not, implying a possible advantage of training. However, no relationship was found between therapeutical adherence of smell training and olfactory function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗅觉训练对 COVID-19 引起的嗅觉丧失的影响。
目的:虽然嗅觉训练似乎对病毒感染后嗅觉缺失有效,但其对 COVID-19 引起的嗅觉缺失的效果目前还不太清楚。因此,我们旨在研究嗅觉训练对 COVID-19 引起的嗅觉丧失患者的潜在影响。其中一组(n=111)被指导进行嗅觉训练,每天两次,持续 12 周,每天监测治疗依从性;而另一组(n=50)没有进行嗅觉训练。在基线和 12 周后,我们使用嗅棒测试 (SST) 对参与者的嗅觉进行客观分析,并以阈值、辨别力和识别力 (TDI) 分数进行报告。我们还确定了治疗依从性与 TDI 分数之间的关系。结果:我们发现,进行了 12 周嗅觉训练的 COVID-19 引起的嗅觉障碍患者与未进行嗅觉训练的患者在嗅觉功能的心理物理方面存在显著差异。结论:我们发现进行嗅觉训练和未进行嗅觉训练的 COVID-19 引起的嗅觉障碍患者在嗅觉功能的心理物理方面存在明显的中度差异,这意味着训练可能具有优势。然而,我们并未发现坚持嗅觉训练与嗅觉功能之间存在任何关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Is nasal closure an effective treatment for severe refractory epistaxis in HHT? A scoping review and narrative synthesis. Analysis of nasal fracture management and subsequent surgical outcomes across demographics. Omalizumab reduces allergic rhinitis symptoms due to Japanese cedar pollen by improving eosinophilic inflammation. Normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Nasal endoscopy score thresholds to trigger consideration of chronic rhinosinusitis treatment escalation and implications for disease control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1