Adverse Effects of Natural Products in the Oral Mucosa and Face: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1089/jicm.2023.0675
Débora E Silva Campos, Isis de Araújo Ferreira Muniz, Heloísa Nunes Brandão, Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai, Thiago Gomes da Trindade, Dúcia Caldas Cosme-Trindade
{"title":"Adverse Effects of Natural Products in the Oral Mucosa and Face: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Débora E Silva Campos, Isis de Araújo Ferreira Muniz, Heloísa Nunes Brandão, Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai, Thiago Gomes da Trindade, Dúcia Caldas Cosme-Trindade","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This scoping review aimed to map the adverse reactions in the oral mucosa and face caused by the use of natural products. <b><i>Methodology:</i></b> This review was performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, with a protocol registered in the Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/R57D8). The search was carried out systematically using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and LIVIVO databases, as well as gray literature through Google Scholar and OpenGrey. Reports of clinical cases on the adverse effects of natural products on the oral mucosa or perioral region of the face resulted from inappropriate use or self-medication were included. Data from the included studies were described in a narrative form. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Seven hundred and six studies were identified, and after removing duplicates and applying the eligibility criteria, 28 studies were included. The year of publication ranged from 1976 to 2022. The studies were conducted in 19 countries. Fifty patients were mentioned in the included studies and 34 were female (68%). The natural products most related to adverse reactions were propolis (<i>n</i> = 17), with manifestations such as perioral eczema, edema, erosions, erythema, allergic contact dermatitis, and garlic (<i>n</i> = 9), with manifestations such as chemical burn, burning sensation, vesicles and blisters, crusts, and ulcerations. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Propolis and garlic were the natural products with the most reported adverse effects on the oral mucosa and perioral region.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2023.0675","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the adverse reactions in the oral mucosa and face caused by the use of natural products. Methodology: This review was performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, with a protocol registered in the Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/R57D8). The search was carried out systematically using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and LIVIVO databases, as well as gray literature through Google Scholar and OpenGrey. Reports of clinical cases on the adverse effects of natural products on the oral mucosa or perioral region of the face resulted from inappropriate use or self-medication were included. Data from the included studies were described in a narrative form. Results: Seven hundred and six studies were identified, and after removing duplicates and applying the eligibility criteria, 28 studies were included. The year of publication ranged from 1976 to 2022. The studies were conducted in 19 countries. Fifty patients were mentioned in the included studies and 34 were female (68%). The natural products most related to adverse reactions were propolis (n = 17), with manifestations such as perioral eczema, edema, erosions, erythema, allergic contact dermatitis, and garlic (n = 9), with manifestations such as chemical burn, burning sensation, vesicles and blisters, crusts, and ulcerations. Conclusion: Propolis and garlic were the natural products with the most reported adverse effects on the oral mucosa and perioral region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天然产品对口腔黏膜和面部的不良影响:范围综述》。
目的:本范围综述旨在了解使用天然产品对口腔粘膜和面部造成的不良反应。研究方法:本综述根据《乔安娜-布里格斯研究所证据综述手册》和《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目扩展范围综述》(PRISMA-ScR)指南进行,并在开放科学框架(DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/R57D8)中注册了协议。检索使用了 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase、LILACS 和 LIVIVO 数据库,并通过 Google Scholar 和 OpenGrey 对灰色文献进行了系统检索。其中包括有关天然产品因使用不当或自行用药而对口腔粘膜或面部口周造成不良影响的临床病例报告。所纳入研究的数据以叙述的形式进行描述。结果:共确定了 76 项研究,在去除重复研究并应用资格标准后,纳入了 28 项研究。发表年份从 1976 年到 2022 年不等。这些研究在 19 个国家进行。纳入的研究中提到了 50 名患者,其中 34 人为女性(68%)。与不良反应关系最大的天然产品是蜂胶(17 例),表现为口周湿疹、水肿、糜烂、红斑、过敏性接触性皮炎;以及大蒜(9 例),表现为化学灼伤、烧灼感、水泡和水疱、结痂和溃疡。结论蜂胶和大蒜是对口腔黏膜和口周产生不良影响最多的天然产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrative Health and Wellness Coaching: A Call to Action to Address a Research Gap for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Mapping the Research Landscape: The Rise of Bibliometric Analysis in Integrative Medicine. Identifying Barriers to Implementing Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies in Rhode Island Health Care Systems: A Qualitative Approach. Effects of Mantram Repetition on Spiritual Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Use of Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches in Adults with Long COVID in the US, a Nationally Representative Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1